Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christos Georgiou schrieb:
Is that intentional?
It would have helped if you had said what that is you are referring
to, it would also have helped if you had stated an opinion on whether
you believe that to be a bug
Hello, people. I am not sure whether this is a bug or intentional, so I
thought checking it with you before opening a bug. I will explain this
issue, but please understand this is not a question for help to change the
algorithm (this has been done already), so it's not a question of c.l.py.
Forgive my piggy backing, but I forgot to include the only related post I
found, which did not clear things up for me:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/e2dcb2362649a601
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christos Georgiou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
issue, but please understand this is not a question for help to change
the
algorithm (this has been done already), so it's not a question of c.l.py.
It's a matter
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please submit a bug report to sf.net/projects/python.
Done: www.python.org/sf/1568240
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Does anyone know why this happens? I can't find any information pointing to
this being deliberate.
I just upgraded to 2.5 on Windows (after making sure I can build extensions
with the freeware VC++ Toolkit 2003) and some of my programs stopped
operating. I saw in a French forum that someone
I haven't followed the complete discussion about once, but I would assume it
would be used as such:
once name = expression
that is, always an assignment, with the value stored as a cellvar, perhaps,
on first execution 0f the code.
Typically I would use it as:
def function(a):
once
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Paul Moore has contributed a Python build procedure for the
free version of the 2003 compiler. This one is without IDE,
but still, it should allow people without a VS 2003 license
to work on Python itself; it
Michael Foord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
It worries me that there might be a valid expression allowed here that I
haven't thought of. My current rules allow anything that looks like
``(a, [b, c, (d, e)], f)`` - any nested identifier list. Would anything
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christos Georgiou wrote:
I would like to know if supplying a patch for it sometime in the next
couple
of weeks would be considered a patch (since the widget currently is not
working at all, its class in Tix.py
I made a plea for help months ago (just checked, and it was Jan 2004! time
flies like a fruit or something, ref
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2004-January/202704.html )
about directions to fix the borken Tix.Grid widget; I had no replies.
I finally found some spare time (too
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christos Georgiou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Christos]
Well, what's the result of
bytes([1,0,0])^ bytes([1,0])
? Is it bytes([0,0,0]) (à la little-endian) or is it bytes([1,1,0])
(straight conversion to base-256
Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baptiste Carvello wrote:
[Baptiste]
while manipulating binary data will happen mostly with bytes objects,
some
operations are better done with ints, like the bit manipulations with the
|~^
operators.
[Greg]
Why not just
M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft has recently released their express version of the Visual C++.
Given that this version is free for everyone, wouldn't it make sense
to ship Python 2.5 compiled with this version ?!
talk about embarrassing spelling misteaks
[Fredrik Lundh]
(but alright, as long as you don't call me Fred...)
[Steve Holden]
Did I *ever* do that? That would have been an embarrassing slip ;-)
I know I'm extremely late, but there should be a POTF (Pun Of The
Fortnight) from now on.
A member
I didn't see any mention of this product in the Python-Dev list, so I
thought to let you know.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/visualc/download/
There is also a link for a CD image (.img) file to download.
I am downloading now, so I don't know yet whether Python compiles with it
This might be minor-- but I didn't see anyone mentioning it so far. If
`exec` functionality is to be provided, then I think it still should be a
keyword for the parser to know; currently bytecode generation is affected if
`exec` is present. Even if that changes for Python 3k (we don't know
Reinhold Birkenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
after adding Oleg Broytmann's findnocoding.py to Tools/scripts, I wonder
whether the Tools directory is documented at all. There are many useful
scripts there which many people will not find if they are not
Michael Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guard? Monitor? Don't really like either of these.
I know I am late, but since guard means something else, 'sentinel' (in the
line of __enter__ and __exit__ interpretation) could be an alternative.
Tongue in cheek.
Michael Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I'm currently planning for a 2.4.2 sometime around mid September. I
figure
we cut a release candidate either on the 7th or 14th, and a final a week
later.
Cool. I'm not
At the moment I'm trying to create a minimal file that when imported fails
with 2.4.1 . I'll update the case as soon as I have one, but I wanted to
draw some attention in python-dev in case it rings a bell.
Please ignore my previous message --through gmane I saw only mwh's message,
and after
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or my personal favorite,
while mylist:
del mylist[::2]
Then the original index positions with the most consecutive trailing 1
bits survive the longest, which is important to avoid ZODB cache bugs
wink.
This
Chris Ryland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hate to add to what could be an endless discussion, but... ;-)
In this case, while is the better time-related prefix, whether
keyword (hopeless, due to ages-old boolean-controlled loop association)
or function, since
23 matches
Mail list logo
