Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Denis Kotov writes:
> > See:
> > https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxyNe_dsZKinT_RT3UGb-BaP0SnvKteo2o
> > No thanks, if it's not text I'm not going to look at it. I don't have
> time to watch videos with no explanation, and best guess is 90% of it
>
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Denis Kotov writes:
> > Usually people say that C++ not fit in CPython not knowing C++,
> > That's not the issue. There are plenty of people who know C++ who say
> the benefits of C++ are not worth the bugs, the effort, and the plain
> old chur
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> The point of C++ standard support level is linking CPython to external
> codebases using C++, and at least for the standard CPython currently
> supports, the C++ ABI is specific to each compiler and version (for
> some compilers), right?
Yes, C++ ABI is specific to
> From huge codebase experience with C++, it does not cause
significantly better (1) Readabillity or (2) Maintainability on its own
compared to C
I would argue with you on that ...
RAII is fundamental C++ feature that improves Maintainability !!
Also readability is much better because you work
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> You take a hunk of the standard library (in this case it would have to
> be an accelerator written in C since you want to compare C++ vs. C) or
> interpreter code, and translate it to the new syntax.
> Now, *INCREF and friends are frequently cited as annoyances or even
Yes, each compiler implement its own compiler ABI, but for me it is not a
problem at all, just provide build with 3 major compilers gcc/clang (due to
binary compatability) and Visual Studio
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To
Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 16/04/2021 19.14, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> > My personal stop of contributing in CPython is that it is written in pure C
> > !!
> > I wrote code in both: pure C and C++, but I like writing code in C++,
> > because it simplifies things without losing perfomance
>
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:08:58 -
> "Denis Kotov" redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Okay lets try to discuss one by one:
> >
> > Readability - less code, most code is hidden by abstraction without losing
> > performance
> >
&g
Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 4/16/21 10:43 AM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Take a look at this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7Sd8A6_fYU
> > or read some articles ... otherwise I will need to spend too many time
> > providing evidences to you and after all you will probably will reject
>
edwin＠211mainstreet.net wrote:
> Anyone who has done a language change on a project knows that it is a huge
> disruption. You need solid justification to make such a change. All I have
> seen in this thread is personal opinion. Since this is a personal opinion
> exchange, I am of the humble
10 matches
Mail list logo
