ers in your
benchmark results.
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:50 AM Larry Hastings wrote:
> On 3/4/19 2:29 AM, Joni Orponen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 7:08 AM Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>> This bug in bpo-33329:
>>
>> https://bugs.python.org/issue33329
>>
>>
>> This is also p
lds of 2.7 on Debian Buster with
GCC. Somehow building with Clang is fine.
Does the configure time choice of compiler make a difference here for 3.4
and 3.5?
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/
hutil.rmtree in tearDown()). That way
> I don’t have to adjust house-keeping code when I make changes to test code.
>
As tempfile provides context managers, should these be used internally for
something like this? Provide a decorator which passes in the temp file /
directo
Currently using threading side effects unpicklables into the globals.
Also being able to pass in globals=None would be optimal for a lot of use
cases.
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
id for what
people actually want to limit. The practical issue is most likely something
to do with hitting timeouts when trying to queue too much work onto a
service.
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.pyt
obsolete.platform.linux_distribution()
If one can import from the future can one can also import from the past?
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Joni Orponen
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
>> chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> And maybe we co
7;m not sure how much each bit continues. Our recipe for
> python 3.6 can be found at:
>
Do you metrify LTO and PGO independent of each other as well or only the
"enable everything" combo? I've had mixed results with LTO so far, but this
is probably hardware
>
We are re-building ourselves. Seems we've cooked up something not too
unsimilar to what Anaconda is doing, but less generic and covering less
corner cases.
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://
well.
>
PyPy is also currently eyeing doing their macOS builds better:
https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/2734/establish-a-build-and-release-pipeline-for
What do the Anaconda static builds get built on?
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
.
As suggested on pythonmac-sig, I'd like to see 10.11 get chosen as the
macOS to build on as it provides a decent balance between hardware
compatibility and being new(er).
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://m
st on pythonmac-sig:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/2018-January/024283.html
--
Joni Orponen
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman
;
There is also https://github.com/praekeltfoundation/travis-pyenv I've found
useful when one needs excactness and also to decouple oneself from the
Travis side rolling releases of Python. Also caches the Python version for
you.
See
https://github.com/plone/plone.intelligenttext/blob/a71bdc5b
14 matches
Mail list logo
