Hello,
I'm just starting a new thread since the old ones are so crowded.
First, overall I think the PEP is starting to look really good and
insightful! (congratulations to Victor)
I have a couple of comments, mostly small ones:
function (str): name of the underlying operating system function.
The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
- time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
another
- time.perf_counter(): process-wide results, comparable from one thread
to another (?)
-
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:29, Victor Stinner
I will move the precision of monotonic clock of Windows 9x info into this
table.
I would just remove it entirely. It's not relevant since it's not supported.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:29:10 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
- time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
another
-
