Hi, Ronald,
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 15 Feb, 2009, at 21:13, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP (hhas) said:
>>
>> As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/eliminated
>> from the standard library a
Hi Ned,
Ned Deily wrote:
> Other than Mac/Modules, the rest of the Mac/ directory is mainly stuff
> used for building or going into the OS X installer images, including
> things like IDLE.app. These are used in 2.x and in 3.x.
Thanks, knowing that makes the ticket handling easier!
>> There are
On 15 Feb, 2009, at 21:13, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
Hi,
In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP
(hhas) said:
As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/
eliminated
from the standard library and there are no longer any plans to
submit
In article
<2d75d7660902151517p22440361u76f686dc2f0e1...@mail.gmail.com>,
"Daniel (ajax) Diniz" wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > As of Python 2.6 everything Mac-specific is deprecated and in 3.0 they
> > are gone (you can read PEP 3108 for the details or just note that the
> > Mac/Modules direct
Looks like the MDS ate the copy sent to the list, here's it again:
Brett Cannon wrote:
> As of Python 2.6 everything Mac-specific is deprecated and in 3.0 they
> are gone (you can read PEP 3108 for the details or just note that the
> Mac/Modules directory is gone in 3.0). They will still be around
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:13, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP (hhas)
> said:
>
>As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/eliminated
>from the standard library and there are no longer any plans to su
Hi,
In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP (hhas) said:
As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/eliminated
from the standard library and there are no longer any plans to submit
appscript for possible inclusion. This issue should be reject
