Barry Warsaw schrieb:
Thoughts? I don't want to waste my time if nobody thinks a 2.3.6 would
be useful, but I'm happy to do it if there's community support. I'll
also need the usual help with Windows installers and documentation updates.
I personally would consider it a waste of time. Since
On Sep 9, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Barry Warsaw schrieb:
Thoughts? I don't want to waste my time if nobody thinks a 2.3.6
would
be useful, but I'm happy to do it if there's community support. I'll
also need the usual help with Windows installers and documentation
I am considering producing a Python 2.3.6 release, which would of course only be a bug fix maintenance release. The primary reason is that not all OS distributions have upgraded to Python 2.4 and I think it's worthwhile for us to bless a release that fixes known critical bugs. I'm willing to
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I am considering producing a Python 2.3.6 release, which would of
course only be a bug fix maintenance release. The primary reason is
that not all OS distributions have upgraded to Python 2.4 and I think
it's worthwhile for us to bless a release that fixes known
Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am considering producing a Python 2.3.6 release, which would of
course only be a bug fix maintenance release. The primary reason is
that not all OS distributions have upgraded to Python 2.4 and I think
it's worthwhile for us to bless a release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 29, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
There's one problem: it was thought for a long time that there
wouldn't be
any more 2.3 releases, so bug fixes were applied only in the head
and 2.4
branch.
If there will be a 2.3.6, it
