Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Finney
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis writes: > 2009-05-02 07:34:15 Stephen J. Turnbull napisał(a): > > Barry Warsaw writes: > > > Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ? > > > > Shouldn't that be > > > > s/Active/Proposed/ > > No. > From `info sed 'sed Programs' 'The "s" Command'`: Stephen was,

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-02 Thread Isaac Morland
On Sat, 2 May 2009, MRAB wrote: Alexander Belopolsky wrote: .. leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated. 'X' or 'Z' for "Rejected"? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed discussion. :-) Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for 'Accepted' and

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-02 Thread Daniel Diniz
MRAB wrote: > Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for > 'Accepted' and :-( for 'Rejected'. :-) Yes there are, but we'd need to set the font size to 'humongous' to see the smilies: ☹ ☺. In py3k: print(chr(0x2639), chr(0x263a)) In trunk: print(unichr(0x2639), unichr(0x263a

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-02 Thread MRAB
Alexander Belopolsky wrote: .. leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated. 'X' or 'Z' for "Rejected"? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed discussion. :-) Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for 'Accepted' and :-( for 'Rejected'. :-) __

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-02 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-05-02 07:34:15 Stephen J. Turnbull napisał(a): > Barry Warsaw writes: > > On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > > > > > P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a > > > proposal... > > > > +1 > > > > Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ? > > Should

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Alexander Belopolsky writes: > .. > > leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated. > > 'X' or 'Z' for "Rejected"? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed > discussion. :-) The Japanese contingent suggests O (UPPERCASE LATIN LETTER O) for accepted and X for rejected. (Actua

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Barry Warsaw writes: > On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > > > P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a > > proposal... > > +1 > > Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ? Shouldn't that be s/Active/Proposed/

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
.. > leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated. 'X' or 'Z' for "Rejected"? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed discussion. :-) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Un

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread MRAB
Michael Foord wrote: MRAB wrote: Benjamin Peterson wrote: 2009/5/1 MRAB : I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for example? ->

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote: P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a proposal... +1 Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ? -Barry PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Python-D

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Michael Foord
MRAB wrote: Benjamin Peterson wrote: 2009/5/1 MRAB : I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for example? -> A - Accepted proposal

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread MRAB
Benjamin Peterson wrote: 2009/5/1 MRAB : I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for example? -> A - Accepted proposal -> R - Rejected

Re: [Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/5/1 MRAB : > I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used > more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used > for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for example? > > -> A - Accepted proposal > -> R - Rejected proposal >   W -

[Python-Dev] Oddity PEP 0 key

2009-05-01 Thread MRAB
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for example? -> A - Accepted proposal -> R - Rejected proposal W - Withdrawn proposal -> D -