Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-07 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Westley Martínez wrote: > +1 for voting Can we call it something else though? "Voting" reminds me too much of situations where people who don't do anything get to say what they want others to do. That doesn't sit well in a volunteer-run open source project. But it

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-07 Thread Westley Martínez
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 15:54 +0100, Éric Araujo wrote: > Hi, > > > Roadmap is not a strict plan for release. It helps people > > *self-organize into teams* around specific feature or bugs. > I think the tracker is used to this effect with success. > > > Yes, there can (or even should) be a way for

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-07 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi, > Roadmap is not a strict plan for release. It helps people > *self-organize into teams* around specific feature or bugs. I think the tracker is used to this effect with success. > Yes, there can (or even should) be a way for everybody with Python > account to vote on items in the Roadmap Doi

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:26 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > Yes, there can (or even should) be a way for everybody with Python > account to vote on items in the Roadmap and subscribe to updates (like > commits, messages, code reviews, tweets and other stuff related to one > item). This will give Je

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:24:29 -0800 Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > > How about official RoadMap? There is no visibility into what's going > > on in Python development. New people can' t jump in and help do bring > > some features faster. http:

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 06:40, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Guido van Rossum >> wrote: >> > Now that the language moratorium is lifted, let's make sure to get PEP >> > 380 implemented for Python 3.3. >> >> H

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread Raymond Hettinger
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > How about official RoadMap? There is no visibility into what's going > on in Python development. New people can' t jump in and help do bring > some features faster. http://dungeonhack.sourceforge.net/Roadmap Thanks for the link. Their roadm

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread Guido van Rossum
A project roadmap is usually something that a team commits to, with some caveats, in order to give the customers (the "outside world") some view in development that is already planned or under way or on some other way committed to. But a roadmap itself takes effort to create and maintain. Also, of

Re: [Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread Brian Curtin
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 06:40, anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Guido van Rossum > wrote: > > Now that the language moratorium is lifted, let's make sure to get PEP > > 380 implemented for Python 3.3. > > How about official RoadMap? There is no visibility into what's g

[Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)

2011-03-03 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Now that the language moratorium is lifted, let's make sure to get PEP > 380 implemented for Python 3.3. How about official RoadMap? There is no visibility into what's going on in Python development. New people can' t jump in and help do