I had announced this to import-sig already; now python-dev.
I have now written an implementation of PEP 382, and fixed some details
of the PEP in the process. The implementation is available at
http://hg.python.org/features/pep-382-2/
With this PEP, a Python package P can consist of either a
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I had announced this to import-sig already; now python-dev.
I have now written an implementation of PEP 382, and fixed some details
of the PEP in the process. The implementation is available at
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace
package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not
the case, I suspect those previous objections were overstated (and all
packaging
I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace
package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not
the case, I suspect those previous objections were overstated (and all
packaging related code manages to cope well enough with modules where
the file name
Am 06.11.2011 16:38, schrieb PJ Eby:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace
package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not
the
