On 22 Jan 2015, at 23:03, Neil Girdhar wrote:
Thanks for taking a look. I looked at inspect and I can't see
anything
that needs to change since it's the caller rather than the receiver
who has
more options after this PEP.
You are probably right. And for calling via Signature.bind() your pat
Thanks for taking a look. I looked at inspect and I can't see anything
that needs to change since it's the caller rather than the receiver who has
more options after this PEP. Did you see anything in particular?
Best,
Neil
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Walter Dörwald
wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2
On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:34, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> My question first:
> test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is being
> generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the introduced
> problems. Who is generating test_ast??
>
> Update:
>
> So far, I've done the followi
Okay, I think it's ready for a code review. Would anyone be kind enough to
offer comments?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Neil Girdhar
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>
>> $ ./python Lib/test/test_ast.py -g
>> exec_results = [
>> ('Module',
$ ./python Lib/test/test_ast.py -g
exec_results = [
('Module', [('Expr', (1, 0), ('NameConstant', (1, 0), None))]),
('Module', [('FunctionDef', (1, 0), 'f', ('arguments', [], None, [], [],
None, []), [('Pass', (1, 9))], [], None)]),
('Module', [('FunctionDef', (1, 0), 'f', ('arguments', [('arg', (1
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> $ ./python Lib/test/test_ast.py -g
> exec_results = [
> ('Module', [('Expr', (1, 0), ('NameConstant', (1, 0), None))]),
> ('Module', [('FunctionDef', (1, 0), 'f', ('arguments', [], None, [], [],
> None, []), [('Pass', (1, 9))],
Hi Benjamin,
I'm having trouble finding where it is generating the lines below
EVERYTHING BELOW IS GENERATED #
Neither a call to test_ast nor a make (in case it's generated somewhere
else) regenerate those lines if they have been removed.
How were those lines generated?
Best,
Neil
O
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 11:34, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> My question first:
> test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is being
> generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the introduced
> problems. Who is generating test_ast??
It generates itself.
My question first:
test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is being
generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the introduced
problems. Who is generating test_ast??
Update:
So far, I've done the following:
Updated the patch to 3.5
Fixed the grammar to accept fin
