[Python-Dev] PEPs and PEP 8 changes

2015-09-05 Thread Jim J. Jewett
PEP 498 is only the latest PEP where part of the concern is fear that it may encourage certain types of bad code. Would it be reasonable to ask PEPs to start including a section on any recommended changes to PEP8? (e.g., "If an embedded expression doesn't fit on a single line, factor it out to a

Re: [Python-Dev] PEPs and PEP 8 changes

2015-09-05 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 at 12:58 Jim J. Jewett wrote: > PEP 498 is only the latest PEP where part of the concern is fear that > it may encourage certain types of bad code. > > Would it be reasonable to ask PEPs to start including a section on any > recommended changes to PEP8?

Re: [Python-Dev] PEPs and PEP 8 changes

2015-09-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 05, 2015, at 03:57 PM, Jim J. Jewett wrote: >Would it be reasonable to ask PEPs to start including a section on any >recommended changes to PEP8? (e.g., "If an embedded expression >doesn't fit on a single line, factor it out to a named variable.") Yes, I think it's reasonable to