On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> And on that note... was there any particular reason for leaving
> NotImplemented out for this change?
Never mind, just noticed the subsequest checkin.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
___
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Georg Brandl :
>> Shouldn't there be a matching Doc change somewhere?
>
> Somewhere is the question!
While None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis are all documented as singletons,
the behaviour of calling their types is not specified an
2011/7/29 Georg Brandl :
> Am 30.07.2011 01:20, schrieb benjamin.peterson:
>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/84c3be27b4c7
>> changeset: 71614:84c3be27b4c7
>> parent: 71611:a6afd26caa8a
>> user: Benjamin Peterson
>> date: Fri Jul 29 18:19:43 2011 -0500
>> summary:
>> make t
Am 30.07.2011 01:20, schrieb benjamin.peterson:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/84c3be27b4c7
> changeset: 71614:84c3be27b4c7
> parent: 71611:a6afd26caa8a
> user:Benjamin Peterson
> date:Fri Jul 29 18:19:43 2011 -0500
> summary:
> make the types of None and Ellipsis call
