On 5/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again. There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around. I can't remember if I saw something about
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again. There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around. I can't remember if I saw something about that at the
NFS sprint or not.
There is a lingering problem that I can't fix on all the boxes. Namely:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again. There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around. I can't remember if I saw something about that at the
NFS sprint or not.
bob's new _struct module was checked in on May
Neal Norwitz wrote:
I can
understand why we wouldn't want to unconditionally overwrite a user's
modified Setup. However, for the buildbots, it seems safer to always
overwrite it.
FWIW, with the buildbots I run, I use clobber mode, with which the
entire build directory is removed and
On 5/30/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again. There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around. I can't remember if I saw something about that at the
NFS sprint
Zitat von Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FWIW, with the buildbots I run, I use clobber mode, with which the
entire build directory is removed and rebuilt on each run. It slows
things down a bit, but the results have been more consistent and it's
easier to administer.
We should not do this.
Zitat von Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again. There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around. I can't remember if I saw something about that at the
NFS sprint or not.
You can clean each
