Am 04.06.2012 00:51, schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
That last statement basically suggests that something like regex would
never be accepted until a CPython core developer was actually running
into pain with the many flaws in the re module (especially when it comes
to Unicode). I disagree with
On 05/06/2012 03:40, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/4/2012 9:22 PM, MRAB wrote:
I'm not planning any further changes to regex. I think it already has
enough features...
Do you have any idea where regex + Python stands in regard to Unicode
TR18 support levels? http://unicode.org/reports/tr18/
On 04.06.2012 01:28, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I apologise, unmaintained is too strong a word. I mean lacking an
owner sufficiently confident in their authority and expertise and with
sufficient time and energy to add,or approve the addition of,
substantial new features which may require significant
(I've been having trouble with my email recently, so I missed this
thread amongst others.)
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing
MRAB wrote:
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
help out.
Are you withdrawing your offer to maintain regex in the stdlib?
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
But changes to the stdlib (bug fixes or functional changes) are very likely
to run at a slower pace to what third-party packages can afford. If you
continue to develop regex outside of the stdlib, that could cause
On 05/06/2012 01:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
help out.
Are you
On 6/4/2012 9:22 PM, MRAB wrote:
I'm not planning any further changes to regex. I think it already has
enough features...
Do you have any idea where regex + Python stands in regard to Unicode
TR18 support levels? http://unicode.org/reports/tr18/
While most of the Tailored Support Level 3
On 02.06.2012 02:37, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/06/2012 18:27, Brett Cannon wrote:
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the stdlib. Is this still being worked
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
ipaddress really made it in because I personally ran into the limitations
of not having IP address support in the stdlib. I ended up doing quite a
bit of prompting to ensure the process of cleaning up the API to modern
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
ipaddress really made it in because I personally ran into the limitations
of not having IP address support in the stdlib. I ended up doing quite a bit
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
ipaddress really made it in because I personally ran into the
limitations
That last statement basically suggests that something like regex would
never be accepted until a CPython core developer was actually running
into pain with the many flaws in the re module (especially when it comes
to Unicode). I disagree with that.
Per the language summit, I think we need to
heh. indeed. regardless, the module is available on pypi whether it
goes in or not so we do at least have something to point people to when
they need more than the existing undermaintained re (sre) module.
I completely disagree that SRE is unmaintained. It has about monthly
commits to it, to
I apologise, unmaintained is too strong a word. I mean lacking an owner
sufficiently confident in their authority and expertise and with sufficient
time and energy to add,or approve the addition of, substantial new features
which may require significant refactoring of internal details.
Perhaps
Gregory P. Smith wrote:
Per the language summit, I think we need to just do it. Put it in as re
and rename the existing re module to sre.
I thought that the plan was to put the regex module in as regex, leaving re
unchanged for backwards compatibility, with any backwards-incompatible
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the stdlib. Is this still being worked
towards?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On 6/1/2012 1:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the stdlib. Is this still being worked
towards?
Since there is no PEP to define
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/1/2012 1:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the
ipaddress really made it in because I personally ran into the limitations
of not having IP address support in the stdlib. I ended up doing quite a
bit of prompting to ensure the process of cleaning up the API to modern
stdlib standards didn't stall (even now, generating a module reference from
the
On 01/06/2012 18:27, Brett Cannon wrote:
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the stdlib. Is this still being worked
towards?
Umpteen versions of regex have
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Umpteen versions of regex have been available on pypi for years. Umpteen
bugs against the original re module have been fixed. If regex can't now go
into the standard library, what on earth can?
Reviewing a 4000 line
22 matches
Mail list logo
