Hi,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 5:44 PM Michael Selik wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 1:16 AM Piotr Waszkiewicz
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:33 AM Michael Selik wrote:
>>
>>> In case it saves anyone a couple clicks:
>>> https://www.python.org/de
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:39 PM Michael Selik wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:18 AM Piotr Waszkiewicz
> wrote:
>
>> Do you think about something along those lines?
>> ```
>> phone = book.publisher.owner.phone except AttributeError: None
>> ```
>
Big +1 from me. I've been looking forward to having None-aware operators in
Python as I find them a very neat language addition.
For me personally the main advantage of having maybe-dot (?.) operator is
the ability to express certain logic in a much clearer way, for example:
> class
let me know in that case.
Best regards
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 1:29 AM Steve Dower wrote:
> Okay, I'll let myself get sucked into responding ONE TIME, but only
> because you gave me such a nice API to work with :)
>
> On 10/18/2021 9:11 PM, Piotr Waszkiewicz wrote:
> > &g
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:33 AM Michael Selik wrote:
> In case it saves anyone a couple clicks:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/
>
> I also prefer more syntactic help with exceptions, rather than more syntax
> emphasizing None's uniqueness.
>
Me too, but could you provide me an
ng from 3.6 (the oldest I've checked).
What's more the regex i correctly recognized and does not cause any issues in
other regexp implementations, e.g. the online tool https://regex101.com/
Could somebody help me decide whether this is indeed a bug?
Best regards,
Piotr Waszkiewicz
_
Thank you very much for your input, I've filled in the bug report:
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/98740
Best regards,
Piotr
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 6:55 PM Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 26.10.22 11:17, Piotr Waszkiewicz пише:
> > Hi,
> > I would like to ask your guidance
Hi Maarten,
I like the suggestion but I'm not sure if the real problem with the PEP505
is the symbol/operator used.
Reading through the whole discussion I'm under the impression that the idea
of the None value being treated as an indicator of the missing attribute is
what prevents this PEP from
Hi Maarten,
I'm sorry for the confusion - it was bad wording on my part.
What I really meant was that the problem with the None-aware operator, and
the reason why PEP505 has not been accepted for such a long time, is that
there's no consensus regarding the need for it (and not necessarily the
Hi Philipp,
That's a really good idea, and I'd really want to see it being implemented.
Having said that, I wonder how many people would actually use this concept
of "none-representing" objects. In my 10+ years of programming experience
I've never seen anybody eager to use more complex structures
10 matches
Mail list logo
