Hi Pythonistas,
I wanted to call special attention to the orphaned packages report [1].
On 7/28/25 9:36 PM, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:
python-testrepository @epel-packagers-sig, dcavalca, 2 weeks ago
python3-pbr depends on this package which several other Python packages
(especiall
On 9/24/24 6:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi Miro,
Thanks for bringing this up! I do agree that the widespread usage of
long-deprecated setuptools functionality in Fedora packages is a problem.
Considering the fact that 1.6k Python packages use the macros (while
2k use the %pyproject_ ones), w
On 8/14/24 12:51 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
There might also be packages using tox with a tox.ini like this one:
https://github.com/pycrypto/pycrypto/blob/master/tox.ini
Can we retire that package? The project's README says:
*PyCrypto 2.x is unmaintained, obsolete, and contains security
vulnerab
On Wed Mar 27, 2024 at 15:48 +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Karolina,
Thank you for bring this to the mailing list.
> recently, we were suggested an improvement for %pyproject_buildrequires
> -r/-x.
> We could read the project's runtime dependencies (if they're not marked
> as `dynam
kages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with
> that
> if you are interested).
Regardless, those packages should switch to using flit-core to build.
Pulling in all of flit is not necessary for RPM builds.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
--
_
-urwidtrees
ttorling python-pip
wwoods pungi
xavierbpython-f5-icontrol-rest python-f5-sdk
zbyszekpython-libarchive-c python-music21 python-pysb
Best,
Maxwell
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
--
___
python-devel mailing list
On Sat Aug 19, 2023 at 22:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote:
> > Hi Pythonistas,
> >
> > %pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
> > with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
similar to
the `'*' +auto` flags which are used by pyp2spec for automatic PyPI
builds in Copr but not allowed in Fedora proper.
What do y'all think? Am I missing something?
--
Best,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
___
python-deve
ython-chai kevin pingou
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-chai/pull-request/3
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pytho
On Tue May 16, 2023 at 11:04 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 05. 23 16:49, Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Mon May 15, 2023 at 12:14 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm working on adding python3.11-rpm to EPEL 9 and EPEL 9 Next.
> >>
&
should be fixed, but I
don't consider this issue a blocker. I just didn't have time to complete
a full review myself 😅, so I left a drive by comment and didn't assign
it to myself or set the fedora-review? flag. I'll try to take a look
later.
--
Best,
we've been doing
for the other alt python stacks in RHEL 8.
> If there is a significant demand, I can try add this (and python39-rpm) to
> EPEL
> 8 as well.
As I said on IRC, I'd like that for fedrq.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
_
ript straight into /usr/bin
(i.e. don't make it a proper Python distribution) and running the
current unittest-based tests shouldn't pose too much of a bootstrap
problem.
--
Best,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
change? 2)
I would include a list of affected maintainers (this can be generated
with [1]) and perhaps CC devel@ for increased visibility.
[1]:
https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-package-maintainers
--
Best,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
sign
14 matches
Mail list logo
