On 3 December 2016 at 05:40, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2016 6:58 AM, "Petr Viktorin" wrote:
>> Problems with upstreams getting setup.py wrong should be treated as
>> upstream bugs and treated accordingly: reported as pull requests, or, as the
>> last resort, by a Fedora-specific patch to
On Dec 1, 2016 6:58 AM, "Petr Viktorin" wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2016 02:42 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava
wrote:
On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3
SIG"
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:36:48 PM
Subject: Re: [RFC] RPM's Python dependency generator
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
>>
On 12/01/2016 02:42 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
I don't think the depgen should be enabled by
On 12/01/2016 02:36 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
We'll see how it will go. we have depgen for pkgconfig, libraries,
etc. for many years and people don't go and debug it immediately, but
for many of packages it will help a lot. Anyhow, we'll see after
couple of releases.
Yeah, absolutely. When it's
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in
>>> the
>>> foreseeable future. IIRC it's not that well implem
On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in the
foreseeable future. IIRC it's not that well implemented—e.g. I believe it
doesn't read requirements.txt for example (but I mi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
>
> I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in the
> foreseeable future. IIRC it's not that well implemented—e.g. I believe it
> doesn't read requirements.txt for example (but I might be wrong).
> There will be a lot
On 11/30/2016 08:04 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi,
in short, it reads egg metadata and can generate Provides (which we
already do now), Requires (which I want to talk about) and Recommends
(which I don't care atm).
Let's take simple package -- aiohttp.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi,
in short, it reads egg metadata and can generate Provides (which we
already do now), Requires (which I want to talk about) and Recommends
(which I don't care atm).
Let's take simple package -- aiohttp.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381750
As you can see, since some version mul
11 matches
Mail list logo
