On 29 August 2017 at 19:33, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 10:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Traditionally, that would have meant that we wouldn't get a Fedora
>> based Python 3.7 container out the door until the release of Fedora 29
>> in October, and we'd never ship
On 08/25/2017 10:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 August 2017 at 21:28, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/24/2017 12:22 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Stream names match the Platform module. We follow its policy here, even
when
it changes.
Oh, interesting, I had that backwards (I
On 24 August 2017 at 21:28, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 12:22 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> Stream names match the Platform module. We follow its policy here, even
>>> when
>>> it changes.
>>
>> Oh, interesting, I had that backwards (I thought the planned F27
>> Python
On 08/24/2017 12:22 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 August 2017 at 19:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
My current thinking based on that discussion is that we're actually
going to need a module set that looks like this for F28+:
*
On 24 August 2017 at 19:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> My current thinking based on that discussion is that we're actually
>> going to need a module set that looks like this for F28+:
>>
>> * Platform Python (already planned for F27)
On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 21 August 2017 at 19:46, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/18/2017 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Does that approach sound sufficiently plausible to folks that I can
use it to provide feedback to the folks working on the modularity
On 21 August 2017 at 19:46, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Does that approach sound sufficiently plausible to folks that I can
>> use it to provide feedback to the folks working on the modularity
>> tooling as to the capabilities we
On 08/18/2017 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Hi folks,
[Note: this may not make much sense to folks that haven't been closely
following the Modular Server work for F27. If that's you, sorry -
hopefully this will be more comprehensible by the time I officially
propose it for F28, as the relevant
Hi folks,
[Note: this may not make much sense to folks that haven't been closely
following the Modular Server work for F27. If that's you, sorry -
hopefully this will be more comprehensible by the time I officially
propose it for F28, as the relevant terminology becomes more widely
understood. In