with switching to python 3 and see where this will take us. Does
that
sound good?
If we're looking at this kind of change (python2-foo and
python3-foo),
how about some other prefixes:
* python2-debug-foo (or somesuch) for a build of the package
against
the --with-pydebug python2 package
with switching to python 3 and see where this will take us. Does that
sound good?
If we're looking at this kind of change (python2-foo and python3-foo),
how about some other prefixes:
* python2-debug-foo (or somesuch) for a build of the package against
the --with-pydebug python2 package
On 08/04/2012 02:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I suggest that you start by asking nicely what things need to be done to
port those things to python2 and then go to work on doing them. Trying to
force a change via the Feature process is reversing the order of things.
Features don't exist to
- Original Message -
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:42:02AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
bkab...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we
should
Hi,
I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should switch to
Python 3. As I have learned recently, Ubuntu 12.10 will have Python 3 as
default [1], which makes me a sad panda :(
We always take pride in being close to upstream and having the bleeding edge.
Python 3 is stable and
On 08/03/2012 04:57 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should switch to
Python 3. As I have learned recently, Ubuntu 12.10 will have Python 3 as
default [1], which makes me a sad panda :(
Just to clarify Ubuntu's Python 3 plans: they're
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:55:26AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message - (From Nick)
I believe Fedora uses Python for more core OS infrastructure than
Ubuntu
does, so it's a bigger migration challenge. Does anaconda run on
Python
3? Does yum?
Well, I
