Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

2013-07-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 07/19/2013 06:50 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 07/19/2013 01:56 PM, Andrew McNabb wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: >>> >>> From packaging point of view, this will probably require: >>> 1) Renaming python package to python2 >>> 2) Renaming python3 package

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

2013-07-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/2013 06:11 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > pythonic is a very vague statement and I wouldn't consider most of > your list to be examples of those. Yes, python3 may be a *better* > language (and I would include most of your list as "features of >

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

2013-07-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/2013 07:44 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:30:36PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:45:41PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >>> * python-cheetah -- Development slowed way down after they made >>>

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

2013-07-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:15:31AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/20/2013 06:11 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > pythonic is a very vague statement and I wouldn't consider most of > > your list to be examples of those. Yes, python3 may be a *b

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

2013-07-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:28:33AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Are Matthew's replies stuck in the python-devel moderation queue? > (Just realised the likely reason I'm only seeing half this > conversation...) > > Hmm, also just realised I've been hitting Re