2017-01-07 1:06 GMT+01:00 Barry Warsaw :
> For some reason it's not configured: (...)
Ok, thanks for the information.
> I'm not sure why that's the default inside a chroot.
I found at least one good reason to use the POSIX locale to build a
package: it helps to get
2017-01-06 22:20 GMT+01:00 Barry Warsaw :
>>Because I have the impression that nowadays all Linux distributions are UTF-8
>>by default and you have to show some bloody-mindedness to end up with a POSIX
>>locale.
>
> It can still happen in some corner cases, even on Debian and
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 06, 2017, at 07:22 AM, Stephan Houben wrote:
>
>>Because I have the impression that nowadays all Linux distributions are UTF-8
>>by default and you have to show some bloody-mindedness to end up with a POSIX
>>locale.
>
On Jan 06, 2017, at 07:22 AM, Stephan Houben wrote:
>Because I have the impression that nowadays all Linux distributions are UTF-8
>by default and you have to show some bloody-mindedness to end up with a POSIX
>locale.
It can still happen in some corner cases, even on Debian and Ubuntu where
On Jan 05, 2017, at 05:50 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>I guess that all users and most developers are more in the "UNIX mode"
>camp. *If* we want to change the default, I suggest to use the "UNIX
>mode" by default.
FWIW, it seems to be a general and widespread recommendation to always pass
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:15:52AM +0900, INADA Naoki
wrote:
> >> Always use UTF-8
> >>
> >>
> >> Python already always use the UTF-8 encoding on Mac OS X, Android and
> >> Windows.
> >> Since UTF-8 became the defacto encoding, it makes sense to always
2017-01-06 10:50 GMT+01:00 M.-A. Lemburg :
> Victor: I think you are taking the UTF-8 idea a bit too far.
Hum, sorry, the PEP is still a draft, the rationale is far from
perfect yet. Let me try to simplify the issue: users are unable to
configure a locale for various reasons and
2017-01-06 7:22 GMT+01:00 Stephan Houben :
> How common is this problem?
Last 2 or 3 years, I don't recall having be bitten by such issue.
On the bug tracker, new issues are opened infrequently.
* http://bugs.python.org/issue19977 opened at 2013-12-13, closed at 2014-04-27
On 06.01.2017 04:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 6 January 2017 at 12:37, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> 2017-01-06 3:10 GMT+01:00 Stephen J. Turnbull
>> :
>>> I've quoted Victor out of context, and his other posts make me very
>>> doubtful
On 6 January 2017 at 07:26, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:07 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
>>
>> Neil Girdhar writes:
>>
>> > I don't understand this? How is providing a default method in an
>> > abstract base
Neil Girdhar writes:
> I don't understand this? How is providing a default method in an
> abstract base class a pessimization? If it happens to be slower
> than the code in the current methods, it can still be overridden.
How often will people override until it's bitten them? How many
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:07 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> Neil Girdhar writes:
>
> > I don't understand this? How is providing a default method in an
> > abstract base class a pessimization? If it happens to be slower
> > than the code in the current
12 matches
Mail list logo