On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:35:29AM -0500, Wes Turner wrote:
> On Saturday, July 1, 2017, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:09:51AM +0200, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > But the more I think about it the more I agree with Nick. Let's start
> > by moving itertool
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> - So there's then a new conditional import (e.g. in a compat package)? What
>> does this add?
>
> try: chain
> except NameError: from itertools import chain
>
> Two lines, if and only if you both need chain and want to support
> versions
On 1 July 2017 at 07:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But the more I think about it the more I agree with Nick. Let's start
> by moving itertools.chain into built-ins, with zip and map, and only
> consider giving it an operator after we've had a few years of experience
> with chain as a built-in. We m
On Saturday, July 1, 2017, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:35:29AM -0500, Wes Turner wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 1, 2017, Steven D'Aprano > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:09:51AM +0200, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > But the more I think ab
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 10:38 Koos Zevenhoven, wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2017 5:16 PM, "Oleg Broytman" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:09:52PM -0300, "Soni L."
> wrote:
> > CPython should get a
>
>You're welcome to create one. Go on, send your pull requests!
>
>
> But if you are planning to d
Hi, All!
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:22:31PM +, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 10:38 Koos Zevenhoven, wrote:
> > On Jun 30, 2017 5:16 PM, "Oleg Broytman" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:09:52PM -0300, "Soni L."
> > wrote:
> > > CPython should get a
> >
> >You're w
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
>
>I think the sentence "Python should have implement feature>" should be ;-) forbidden if it is not followed with
> "I'm in the middle of development. Expect the 1st PR in timeframe>."
>
>Python can only have features that You, the ,
On 1 July 2017 at 18:35, Nick Timkovich wrote:
> Devil's advocate: why prepare a patch and submit it if it is going to be
> dismissed out of hand. Trying to gauge support for the idea is a reasonable
> first-step.
That's perfectly OK, but it's important to phrase the email in a way
that makes tha
Let's say that you have a function "def mysum (x; y): return x+y", do you
always want to use your new IADD instruction here? What if I call mysum
("a", "b")?
Victor
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
On 2017-07-01 07:34 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Let's say that you have a function "def mysum (x; y): return x+y", do
you always want to use your new IADD instruction here? What if I call
mysum ("a", "b")?
Victor
Let's say that you do. Given how short it is, it would just get inlined.
Your
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Soni L. wrote:
> On 2017-07-01 07:34 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>> Let's say that you have a function "def mysum (x; y): return x+y", do you
>> always want to use your new IADD instruction here? What if I call mysum
>> ("a", "b")?
>>
>> Victor
>
>
> Let's say that
This is literally PyPy. There's little reason for something like this to
end up in official CPython, at least for now.
--
Ryan (ライアン)
Yoko Shimomura, ryo (supercell/EGOIST), Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone
elsehttp://refi64.com
On Jul 1, 2017 at 5:53 PM, > wrote:
On 2017-07-01 07:34 PM, Victor St
On 2017-07-01 11:57 PM, rym...@gmail.com wrote:
This is literally PyPy. There's little reason for something like this
to end up in official CPython, at least for now.
It's literally not PyPy. PyPy's internal bytecode, for one, does have
typechecks. And PyPy emits machine code, which is not s
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:52:55PM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-07-01 07:34 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >Let's say that you have a function "def mysum (x; y): return x+y", do
> >you always want to use your new IADD instruction here? What if I call
> >mysum ("a", "b")?
> >
> >Victor
>
>
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Let's say that you do. Given how short it is, it would just get inlined.
>> Your call of mysum ("a", "b") would indeed not use IADD, nor would it be
>> a call. It would potentially not invoke any operators, but instead get
>> replaced with
15 matches
Mail list logo
