It's easy, just use vim! (with conceal plugin). I haven't changed anything
other than keywords and built-ins, but the plugin is happy to replace any
other sequence or pattern.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:26 AM Joao S. O. Bueno
wrote:
> Adrien - please take note that since you already wrote abo
Adrien - please take note that since you already wrote about
"everybody could update their environment and editors" to support unicode,
things like what you want (emojis in identifiers) can be supported
at programming editor (and plug-ins and extensions for those) level -
without impairing anyone
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 14:33, Dan Sommers
<2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/15/19 8:54 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > = .(, )
>
> I call foul. At least tentatively. For the moment.
That was a demo (he used private area characters to ensure getti
On 7/15/2019 7:43 AM, Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
Oh ok !
I tried with some unicodes (🔥) but it didn't work. So it's only a
subset as described in PEPs ?
Correct.
What about extending it ?
The PEP has a rationale about why it works like it does. If you want to
extend it, you should be prepare
On 7/15/19 8:54 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
= .(, )
I call foul. At least tentatively. For the moment.
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/ and
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ specifically exclude
private use characters, like U+E24C, from identifiers.
And
> In the future, before making suggestions for new features, you should do
some research into what is already possible, and whether it has already
been suggested before
I did some but couldn't find anything apart using unicode in strings. I
didn't mention in this mail but I used to in my first try
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:34:02PM +0200, Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
> Hi all,
> What would you think if we could write our code using unicode ?
> It would be especially useful for scientific programming (we could use the
> greek letters),
We've been able to do that since about 2007.
https://www.py
On 15/07/2019 12:34, Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
it could also be nice to use emojis for some variables
For values of "nice" I personally find horrifying :-)
Seriously though, the PEP defines valid characters for names by their
unicode categories (plus a few special cases for backward
compatibil
On Jul 15, 2019, at 04:43, Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
>
> Oh ok !
> I tried with some unicodes (🔥) but it didn't work. So it's only a subset as
> described in PEPs ?
> What about extending it ?
I’m pretty sure that the docs explain that the subset of characters that Python
allows in identifiers i
Oh ok !
I tried with some unicodes (🔥) but it didn't work. So it's only a subset
as described in PEPs ?
What about extending it ?
Le lun. 15 juil. 2019 à 13:41, Chris Angelico a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:37 PM Adrien Ricocotam
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > What would you think if we co
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:37 PM Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> What would you think if we could write our code using unicode ?
> It would be especially useful for scientific programming (we could use the
> greek letters), it could also be nice to use emojis for some variables. I
> don't s
On 7/15/2019 7:34 AM, Adrien Ricocotam wrote:
Hi all,
What would you think if we could write our code using unicode ?
It would be especially useful for scientific programming (we could use
the greek letters), it could also be nice to use emojis for some
variables. I don't see any bad consequenc
12 matches
Mail list logo