On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:25 AM Dominik Vilsmeier
wrote:
> On 04.08.20 22:05, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Maybe get-type-hints can be refactored to make writing such a function
> simpler. IIRC the part that takes a single annotation and evaluates it is a
> private function.
>
> That's what I
On 04.08.20 22:05, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Maybe get-type-hints can be refactored to make writing such a function
simpler. IIRC the part that takes a single annotation and evaluates it
is a private function.
That's what I considered and indeed it relies on `typing._eval_type`. If
this was
Maybe get-type-hints can be refactored to make writing such a function
simpler. IIRC the part that takes a single annotation and evaluates it is a
private function.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:57 David Mertz wrote:
> This definitely feels to me like though if an oddball case that "write
> your
This definitely feels to me like though if an oddball case that "write your
own function" seems like the best solution. I accept the OP needs it, but I
have trouble imagining that many others would.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 7:42 AM Dominik Vilsmeier
wrote:
> In one of my projects I'm reusing
