On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Bruno Desthuilliers
wrote:
> WANG Cong a écrit :
>> On 06/26/10 00:11, Neil Hodgson wrote:
>>
>>> WANG Cong:
>>>
4) Also, this will _somewhat_ violate the OOP princples, in OOP,
this is and should be implemented by inherence.
>>> Most object oriented
Hi, folks!
I'm writing wrapper for C library. This library consist of several parts. And i
want split my extension package into different extension modules. I think, this
is the right way ;-) But, there are some common parts that exist in extension
package, get_library_version, Error, and so o
On 6/27/10 10:10 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
On Jun 27, 3:49 am, Bruno Desthuilliers
wrote:
WANG Cong a écrit :
On 06/26/10 00:11, Neil Hodgson wrote:
WANG Cong:
4) Also, this will _somewhat_ violate the OOP princples, in OOP,
this is and should be implemented by inherence.
Most object
On 6/27/10 10:09 PM, alex23 wrote:
Stephen Hansen wrote:
What the hell? When did that show up? o.O (Did I not pay attention
enough during the ABC conversations? It seemed so boring).
The PEPs& post-release docs detailing Py3 changes were worth reading,
it's noted in the sections on changes t
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Stephen Hansen
wrote:
> On 6/27/10 9:30 PM, alex23 wrote:
>> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>> P.S. The removal of callable is something I don't understand in Python
>>> 3: while generally speaking I do really believe and use duck typing, I
>>> too have on occassion wante
On Jun 27, 3:49 am, Bruno Desthuilliers
wrote:
> WANG Cong a écrit :
>
> > On 06/26/10 00:11, Neil Hodgson wrote:
>
> >> WANG Cong:
>
> >>> 4) Also, this will _somewhat_ violate the OOP princples, in OOP,
> >>> this is and should be implemented by inherence.
> >> Most object oriented programmi
Stephen Hansen wrote:
> What the hell? When did that show up? o.O (Did I not pay attention
> enough during the ABC conversations? It seemed so boring).
The PEPs & post-release docs detailing Py3 changes were worth reading,
it's noted in the sections on changes to built-ins:
http://www.python.org
On Jun 27, 9:54 pm, Kushal Kumaran
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jorgen Grahn
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-06-27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> >> In message , Roy Smith wrote:
>
> >>> I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
> >>> careful to use snprintf() to
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Roger wrote:
> As I plan to study JSP, I find it extremly complicated and a part of
> J2EE.
> I did not attend to get the whole of J2EE.
> I hope anybody can describe the future of JSP.
> Is there a place for JSP?
This is python-list/comp.lang.python; we discuss t
On 6/27/10 9:47 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
There's always: isinstance(, collections.Callable)
Why in Guido's name is that in the collections module of all places?
What hath callability to do with container objects?
What he said! Minus the blasphemy.
It's Benevolent _Dictator_ For Life. Not Bene
Carl Banks writes:
> On Jun 27, 8:33 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Carl Banks writes:
> > > I'm disappointed, usually when you sit on your reinforced soapbox and
> > > pretense the air of infinite expertise you at least use reasonable
> > > logic.
> >
> > Kindly stop inventing straw men to attack;
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> In message , Roy Smith wrote:
>>
>>> I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
>>> careful to use snprintf() to avoid buffer overflows. The only problem
>>> is, he wr
On 6/27/10 9:30 PM, alex23 wrote:
Stephen Hansen wrote:
P.S. The removal of callable is something I don't understand in Python
3: while generally speaking I do really believe and use duck typing, I
too have on occassion wanted to dispatch based on 'is callable? do x'.
Sometimes its not convenie
As I plan to study JSP, I find it extremly complicated and a part of
J2EE.
I did not attend to get the whole of J2EE.
I hope anybody can describe the future of JSP.
Is there a place for JSP?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message , Kushal
> Kumaran wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In message , Roy Smith wrote:
>>>
I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
careful to
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:30 PM, alex23 wrote:
> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>> P.S. The removal of callable is something I don't understand in Python
>> 3: while generally speaking I do really believe and use duck typing, I
>> too have on occassion wanted to dispatch based on 'is callable? do x'.
>> S
On Jun 27, 9:02 pm, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 6/27/10 8:48 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > I don't know the exact details of all of these, but I'm going to opine
> > that at least some of these are easily expressible with a function
> > call API. Perhaps more naturally than with string queries. For
Stephen Hansen wrote:
> P.S. The removal of callable is something I don't understand in Python
> 3: while generally speaking I do really believe and use duck typing, I
> too have on occassion wanted to dispatch based on 'is callable? do x'.
> Sometimes its not convenient to do so via duck typing.
On Jun 27, 8:33 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> Carl Banks writes:
> > I'm disappointed, usually when you sit on your reinforced soapbox and
> > pretense the air of infinite expertise you at least use reasonable
> > logic.
>
> Kindly stop inventing straw men to attack; I deny the position you're
> painti
On 2010-06-28 00:02:57 -0400, Stephen Hansen said:
On 6/27/10 8:48 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
I don't know the exact details of all of these, but I'm going to opine
that at least some of these are easily expressible with a function
call API. Perhaps more naturally than with string queries. For
ins
On 6/27/2010 8:28 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
On Jun 27, 5:12 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
I think that covers the main transitions in core Python.
Nice post, but it's missing one thing.
The main benefit of Python 3 for Joe Q. Scripter is this:
The Python team doesn't have to spend any effort on mainta
On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> Then there's the type of SQL that results in DBA's having jobs-- and
> deservedly so. Its *really* a very flexible and powerful language
> capable of doing quite a lot to bend, flex, twist, and interleave that
> data in the server while building up a res
On 6/27/10 8:48 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
I don't know the exact details of all of these, but I'm going to opine
that at least some of these are easily expressible with a function
call API. Perhaps more naturally than with string queries. For
instance, set operations:
query1 = rdb_query(...)
query
On 6/27/10 7:51 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
I'm not the biggest expert on SQL ever, but the only thing I can think
of is expressions. Statements don't express anything very complex,
and could straightforwardly be represented by function calls.
See, there's really two kinds of SQL out there.
There's
On Jun 27, 8:19 pm, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On 2010-06-27 22:51:59 -0400, Carl Banks said:
> > On Jun 27, 3:20 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> >> Carl Banks wrote:
>
> >>> Seriously, almost every other kind of library
On Jun 27, 8:18 pm, MRAB wrote:
> eric dexter wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 5:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
> >> eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
> >>> I managed to get the program running and the menu options are
> >>> appearing on the list but the programs are not running. I suspect it
> >>> is my onexecutemethod
> >>
Carl Banks writes:
> On Jun 27, 4:35 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Carl Banks writes:
> > > Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API.
> >
> > Except for the huge number that deal with text protocols or languages.
>
> No, not really. Almost all types of libraries have binary
On Jun 27, 5:12 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I think that covers the main transitions in core Python.
Nice post, but it's missing one thing.
The main benefit of Python 3 for Joe Q. Scripter is this:
The Python team doesn't have to spend any effort on maintaining a lot
of old obsolete cruft, and can
On 6/27/10 8:04 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
On 6/27/2010 10:25 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 6/27/10 7:09 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
So, my question is, what value can I use as the 2nd arg to isinstance
to see if
foo is a function? And while I'm on the subject, what types does
isinstance not
support?
On 2010-06-27 22:51:59 -0400, Carl Banks said:
On Jun 27, 3:20 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
In article
<14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Banks wrote:
Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API. What
makes databases so special that they
Thanks for the help Thomas Jollans. Just what I needed. I was wondering
what the:
__import__(name, globals={}, locals={}, fromlist=[], level=-1)
globals was (that was from the docstring on __import__. Odd, the doc on
www.python.org has globals as a list, not a dictionary). In any case, I
On 6/27/10 7:55 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
Python3 is about finishing transitions. The last stage in a transition
that replaces something old with something new is to remove the old,..
Main problem is that by the time Python3 has stopped being disruptive,
Python4 will be underw
On 2010-06-27 22:51:59 -0400, Carl Banks said:
On Jun 27, 3:20 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
In article
<14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Banks wrote:
Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API. What
makes databases so special that they
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:03:40 -0700, eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
> It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
> machine... I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
> compiling them or just include the python2.5 exe if I port stuff and
> settle it that way..
I
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:12:10 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> 7. Order comparisonS
>
> In early Python1, I believe all objects could be (arbitrarily) compared
> and sorted. When Guido added the complex type, he decided not to add an
> arbitrary order, as he thought that could mask bugs.
I should poin
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:35 PM, John Bokma wrote:
Might as well spare yourself the trouble and install linux or *bsd. It's
probably easier.
>>>
>>> Ah, yeah, and then run all those Windows applications one requires on
>>> Wine...
>>
>> If you're bound to a platform, use it. My advic
On 6/27/2010 10:25 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 6/27/10 7:09 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
>> So, my question is, what value can I use as the 2nd arg to isinstance
>> to see if
>> foo is a function? And while I'm on the subject, what types does
>> isinstance not
>> support?
>
> Does it have to be a f
Terry Reedy writes:
> Python3 is about finishing transitions. The last stage in a transition
> that replaces something old with something new is to remove the old,..
Main problem is that by the time Python3 has stopped being disruptive,
Python4 will be underway. Python3 is incompatible enough wi
On Jun 27, 3:20 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article
> <14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> Carl Banks wrote:
>
>
>
> > Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API. What
> > makes databases so special that they need a string-command based API?
>
On 6/27/10 7:35 PM, John Bokma wrote:
On top of that, I don't think it's that hard to make a small program
that one associates with .py files which checks the first line and feeds
the .py to the correct version of Python based on the information in the
aformentioned first line.
http://effbot.or
On Jun 27, 4:35 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> Carl Banks writes:
> > Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API.
>
> Except for the huge number that deal with text protocols or languages.
No, not really. Almost all types of libraries have binary APIs,
including those that deal wi
Read you doc file and set the __doc__ attr of the object you want to change.
On Monday, June 28, 2010, Brian Blais wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that the help text for an object will give a description of every
> method based on the doc string. Is there a way to add something to this
> text, spec
geremy condra writes:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM, John Bokma wrote:
>> geremy condra writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards
>>> wrote:
On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
>>>
Steven W. Orr wrote:
I need to test an argument for a few different types.
I'm calling my function like this
arf = MyFunc(list)
What I want to do is to test for whether something is a string, tuple, list or
function. It's that last one that's causing me a problem.
if isinstance(arg, (str, tup
On 6/27/10 7:09 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
So, my question is, what value can I use as the 2nd arg to isinstance to see if
foo is a function? And while I'm on the subject, what types does isinstance not
support?
Does it have to be a function? -- There's quite a few things which are
function-y en
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:46 PM, MRAB wrote:
> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>> On 6/27/10 6:09 PM, MRAB wrote:
>>>
>>> Terry Reedy wrote:
Another would have been to add but never remove anthing, with the
consequence that Python would become increasingly difficult to learn
and the i
eric dexter wrote:
On Jun 27, 5:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
I managed to get the program running and the menu options are
appearing on the list but the programs are not running. I suspect it
is my onexecutemethod
[snip]
#add execute files from the text file list
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM, John Bokma wrote:
> geremy condra writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
>>> On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>>>
> It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
> machine... ?I am realy fond of
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:51 PM, eric dexter wrote:
> On Jun 27, 7:46 pm, MRAB wrote:
>> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>> > On 6/27/10 6:09 PM, MRAB wrote:
>> >> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> >>> Another would have been to add but never remove anthing, with the
>> >>> consequence that Python would become increas
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 6/27/2010 8:41 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> > I think one point which needs to be emphasized more is what does
> > python 3 bring to people.
[…]
> Python3 is about finishing transitions. The last stage in a transition
> that replaces something old with something new is
I need to test an argument for a few different types.
I'm calling my function like this
arf = MyFunc(list)
What I want to do is to test for whether something is a string, tuple, list or
function. It's that last one that's causing me a problem.
if isinstance(arg, (str, tuple, list)):
No problem
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
> wrote:
>
>> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
>> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
>> "testers"
On Jun 27, 7:46 pm, MRAB wrote:
> Stephen Hansen wrote:
> > On 6/27/10 6:09 PM, MRAB wrote:
> >> Terry Reedy wrote:
> >>> Another would have been to add but never remove anthing, with the
> >>> consequence that Python would become increasingly difficult to learn
> >>> and the interpreter increasin
On 2010-06-26 22:33:57 -0400, Lawrence D'Oliveiro said:
In message <2010062522560231540-angrybald...@gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson wrote:
It's not hard. It's just begging for a visit from the fuckup fairy.
That’s the same fallacious argument I pointed out earlier.
In the sense that "using corre
Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 6/27/10 6:09 PM, MRAB wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Another would have been to add but never remove anthing, with the
consequence that Python would become increasingly difficult to learn
and the interpreter increasingly difficult to maintain with
volunteers. I think 2.7 is
On Jun 27, 5:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
> eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
> > I managed to get the program running and the menu options are
> > appearing on the list but the programs are not running. I suspect it
> > is my onexecutemethod
>
> [snip]
>
> > #add execute files from the text file list
> >
On 2010-06-28, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
> wrote:
>
>> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
>> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
>> "testers" are windows user
On 2010-06-28, geremy condra wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>>
It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
machine... ?I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
compili
geremy condra writes:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>>
It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
machine... ?I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
compiling them or ju
On 6/27/10 6:11 PM, geremy condra wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
If you install a real shell on Windows, then the hash-bang line works
fine. :)
Might as well spare yourself the trouble and install linux or *bsd. It's
probably easier.
Not at all, bash via msys i
On 6/27/10 6:09 PM, MRAB wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Another would have been to add but never remove anthing, with the
consequence that Python would become increasingly difficult to learn
and the interpreter increasingly difficult to maintain with
volunteers. I think 2.7 is far enough in that dire
In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
wrote:
> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
> "testers" are windows users and don't want to go through the hassle of
> inst
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>
>>> It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
>>> machine... ?I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
>>> compiling them or just include the python2.5 exe if I
Terry Reedy wrote:
Some people appear to not understand the purpose of Python3 or more
specifically, of the changes that break Python2 code. I attempt here to
give a relatively full explanation.
SUMMARY: Python3 completes (or makes progress in) several transitions
begun in Python2.
In parti
On 2010-06-27, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
>> machine... ?I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
>> compiling them or just include the python2.5 exe if I port stuff and
>> settle it that way..
>
> You're on the only
Some people appear to not understand the purpose of Python3 or more
specifically, of the changes that break Python2 code. I attempt here to
give a relatively full explanation.
SUMMARY: Python3 completes (or makes progress in) several transitions
begun in Python2.
In particular, Python3 bunch
On Jun 27, 4:26 pm, Peter Keller wrote:
> In comp.lang.lisp nanothermite911fbibustards
> wrote:
>
> > TROLL is that mythical creature who is looking for gold ?
>
> Nope, they are the ones that jump out from under bridges and scare little
> children cause they feel bad about themselves and need s
On Jun 27, 6:09 pm, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> > import Tkinter as tk
> > try:
> > import Image #from PIL
> > print 'Using high quality images :)'
> > except ImportError:
> > print 'Using low quality images :('
>
> As such, that still appears rather useless - the following code doesn't
>
eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
I managed to get the program running and the menu options are
appearing on the list but the programs are not running. I suspect it
is my onexecutemethod
[snip]
#add execute files from the text file list
idtool = 400
for e in menuoptions:
Stefan Reich wrote:
>
>Consider Java as a better example: JDK 1.6 still runs and compiles
>everything written for JDK 1.0. That is proper management.
And Python has the same management. Python 2.6 still runs and compiles
everything written for Python 2.0. If there is ever a JDK 2.0, I'll wager
Carl Banks writes:
> Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API.
Except for the huge number that deal with text protocols or languages.
> What makes databases so special that they need a string-command based
> API?
Because SQL is a text language.
--
\ “In t
In comp.lang.lisp nanothermite911fbibustards
wrote:
> TROLL is that mythical creature who is looking for gold ?
Nope, they are the ones that jump out from under bridges and scare little
children cause they feel bad about themselves and need someone else to feel
powerful over.
I hope you get be
Hello,
I know that the help text for an object will give a description of
every method based on the doc string. Is there a way to add
something to this text, specific to an object, but generated at run-
time? I have an object that reads a file, and I would like part of
that file to be sh
On Jun 27, 4:20 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2:33 pm, Peter Keller wrote:
>
> > nanothermite911fbibustards wrote:
> > > That guys intention is not to spread tutorial, but its a commercial. I
> > > clarified its true nature.
>
> > Fair enough.
>
> > > Your ilk has special sk
On Jun 27, 2:33 pm, Peter Keller wrote:
> nanothermite911fbibustards wrote:
> > That guys intention is not to spread tutorial, but its a commercial. I
> > clarified its true nature.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> > Your ilk has special skill in turning white into black and vice-versa.
>
> Assuming much the
On 6/27/10 4:03 PM, eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:09 pm, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
The same happened with other kinds of deprecations and removals through
the life of 2.x. Some applications where tied to a specific Python
release, or to a specific feature that had been deprecated. The
I managed to get the program running and the menu options are
appearing on the list but the programs are not running. I suspect it
is my onexecutemethod
# Get the GUI stuff
import wx
# We're going to be handling files and directories
import os
menufile = open('menufile.txt','r')
# Set up some b
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM, eric_dex...@msn.com
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2:09 pm, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
>> > I agree that there may be not much reason to port custom proprietary
>> > apps that are working fine and which would hardly benefit from, let
>> > alone need, and new Py3 features.
>>
On 06/28/2010 12:48 AM, rantingrick wrote:
> On Jun 27, 5:18 pm, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>> On 06/28/2010 12:06 AM, GrayShark wrote:
>>> I have a large list of package files to import. I'm using a try/except
>>> test to verify the import. Looks like:
>
>
>
>> (1) Don't. If you need the module, th
On Jun 27, 2:09 pm, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
> > I agree that there may be not much reason to port custom proprietary
> > apps that are working fine and which would hardly benefit from, let
> > alone need, and new Py3 features.
>
> In the long run, there will be a benefit: at some point in the fu
On Jun 27, 5:18 pm, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 12:06 AM, GrayShark wrote:
> > I have a large list of package files to import. I'm using a try/except
> > test to verify the import. Looks like:
> (1) Don't. If you need the module, there's no reason to check for
> exceptions. Just let t
In article
<14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Banks wrote:
> Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API. What
> makes databases so special that they need a string-command based API?
> How about this instead (where this a direct binary i
On 06/28/2010 12:06 AM, GrayShark wrote:
> I have a large list of package files to import. I'm using a try/except
> test to verify the import. Looks like:
>
> try:
> import abc
> except ImportError:
> print( "Error importing abc" )
>
> I've got many of those segments. I want to try a
On Jun 24, 6:02 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
> > I construct ad-hoc queries all the time. It really isn’t that hard to do
> > safely. All you have to do is read the documentation
>
> I get worried when people talk about how easy it is to do something
> safel
I have a large list of package files to import. I'm using a try/except
test to verify the import. Looks like:
try:
import abc
except ImportError:
print( "Error importing abc" )
I've got many of those segments. I want to try and refactor this part
of the code.
Trying:
f
On 28 juuni, 00:12, nanothermite911fbibustards
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 1:33 pm, Peter Keller wrote:
>
> > nanothermite911fbibustards wrote:
> > > A single bound pdf document of all the tutorial slides in one SINGLE
> > > pdf with bookmarks and plain white background would be of some worth
> > > but
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 22:41 +0200, Laurent Verweijen wrote:
> In contrast to java or c python seems not be able to use a random
> delimiter.
>
> In java, you can do:
>
>
> Code:
>
> import java.util.Scanner
>
> Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in).useSeperator(" ")
> int a = sc.nextInt()
>
>
>> For the moment, you can encode the string explicitly, and pass a byte
>> string.
>
> That doesn't work
I only have 3.1.2 to test at the moment. I suggest trying to use the
subprocess module instead.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In contrast to java or c python seems not be able to use a random
delimiter.
In java, you can do:
Code:
import java.util.Scanner
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in).useSeperator(" ")
int a = sc.nextInt()
But in python there seems to be no other option then waiting until you
see a newline.
I
On Sun, 2010-06-27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message , Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
>> careful to use snprintf() to avoid buffer overflows. The only problem
>> is, he wrote something along the lines of:
>>
>> snprintf(buf, strlen
Hi Benjamin - and thanks for your reply.
I'm now really confused.
On 27/06/2010 20:05, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
You don't add references to namespaces. You add references to
assemblies and you then you import the namespace.
> From the documentation:
'''
Namespace: System.Windows.Controls
Assemb
Martin v. Loewis schreef op de 27e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
> Am 25.06.2010 17:13, schrieb Peter Kleiweg:
> > How do I set the string encoding for os.system to anything other then UTF-8?
>
> You shouldn't have to set it, as it should use your locale's encoding.
> In 3.1.2, it will
On Fri, 2010-06-25, Nobody wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:15:08 +, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
>> I don't do SQL and I don't even understand the terminology properly
>> ... but the discussion around it bothers me.
>>
>> Do those people really do this?
>
> Yes. And then some.
>
> Among web developer
> I agree that there may be not much reason to port custom proprietary
> apps that are working fine and which would hardly benefit from, let
> alone need, and new Py3 features.
In the long run, there will be a benefit: at some point in the future
(surely years from now), /usr/bin/python will be Py
Am 25.06.2010 17:13, schrieb Peter Kleiweg:
> How do I set the string encoding for os.system to anything other then UTF-8?
You shouldn't have to set it, as it should use your locale's encoding.
In 3.1.2, it will.
For the moment, you can encode the string explicitly, and pass a byte
string.
Regar
For some reason, "PresentationCore" doesn't show up...
PresentationCore
PresentationCore
PresentationCore
PresentationCore
PresentationCore
Jimmy Cao wrote:
Wrong reference
27-Jun-10
Add references to:
"PresentationCore"
and "PresentationFramework"
for the System.Windows and System.Windows.Con
It should be
"PresentationCore"
and "PresentationFramework."
For some reason, that first part got deleted in my reply.
Jimmy Cao wrote:
Wrong reference
27-Jun-10
Add references to:
"PresentationCore"
and "PresentationFramework"
for the System.Windows and System.Windows.Controls etc namespace.
Add references to:
"PresentationCore"
and "PresentationFramework"
for the System.Windows and System.Windows.Controls etc namespace.
Ian Hobson wrote:
Where is StackPanel in IronPython / .Net 4?
27-Jun-10
Hi All,
According to this page
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.c
On Jun 26, 10:02 pm, small Pox wrote:
> Roman Polansky RAPED Semantha Geimer Orally, Analy and Vaginally -
> TRAUMA for victim is so much that she wants it to be out of sight from
> her
>
> Full Court Declaration of ROMAN POLANSKY
>
> http://www.netlexfrance.net/29/09/2009/roman-polanski-a-respect
On 6/27/2010 8:41 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
I think one point which needs to be emphasized more is what does
python 3 bring to people. The" what's new in python 3 page" gives the
impression that python 3 is about removing cruft. That's a very poor
argument to push people to switch.
Python3 i
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
