Celery 2.0 has been released
We're happy to announce the release of Celery 2.0.
Big thanks to all contributors, testers and users!
What is it?
===
Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed
message
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Did you actually try it? Though skeptical, I did, briefly, until I decided
that it probably should have been dated April 1. There is no way to enter
text into minesweeper, nor to make it full screen, nor, as far as I know,
for
I'm the OP btw.
On 1 July 2010 18:10, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I think that Python could be a alternative to bash and have some
advantages, but it's a long way off from being fully implemented.
While a somewhat klutzier language in aspects (the , is both an
Hello there,
I know drag drop is not possible with TK. Which widget could I use for my
python application to be able to work with drag drop?
Thanks,
Alan
--
Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
80 Tennis Court Road,
Just tested it in XP, it works.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Curious if any of you are using GPG or PGP encryption and/or signatures
in your Python apps?
Yes; disclaimer: I'm the author of evpy and am currently working on a
openssl wrapper proposed for inclusion in the stdlib.
In particular
On 02/07/2010 03:38, David wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release 0.0.3 for Bento, the pythonic
packaging solution.
Bento aims at being an alternative to distutils/setuptools/distribute,
based on a static metadata file format. Existing packages can be
converted from setup.py to bento
Hi,
I'm writing a small translator using pyparsing library v1.5.2
(http://pyparsing.wikispaces.com/) and I'm using it both from command
line
and on Google App Engine. Recently I checked one of my samples which
runs
perfect from CLI against GAE and it throws me RuntimeError 'maximum
recursion
depth
snorble wrote:
My question is, why do the modules bar and foo show up in mypack's
dir()? I intend for Foo (the class foo.Foo) and Bar (the class
bar.Bar) to be there, but was not sure about the modules foo and bar.
$ ls mypack/*.py
bar.py
foo.py
__init__.py
$ cat mypack/__init__.py
WANG Cong wrote:
If you think setattr() is as ordinary as a trivial assignment, I will
argue with you, this is personal taste.
To my way of thinking, getattr() and setattr() are the
fundamental way of accessing attributes in Python. The
dot notation is just syntactic sugar for the
I've been playing around with custom iterators to map into Pool. When
I run the code below:
def arif(arr):
return arr
def permutate(n):
k = 0
a = list(range(6))
while kn:
for i in range(6):
a.insert(0, a.pop(5)+6)
#yield a[:] -- produces correct
WANG Cong wrote:
Yeah, my point is why setattr() for dynamic attributes while assignments
for static attributes?
I think there may be a misunderstanding here. You seem to
be thinking of dynamic attribute vs. static attribute
as the distinction between creating a new attribute and
modifying an
WANG Cong wrote:
When I talked about OOP, it is general OOP, not related with
any concrete programming languages.
There isn't really any such thing, though. There is no
universally agreed set of features that a language must
have in order to be considered OOP.
Arguments of the form Language
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk wrote:
Looks very interesting. Just one thing (which might just be me):
the front page looks very stylish and is quite a nice summary.
But I actually *missed* the (grey on grey) [Take me to Bento documentation]
button, which is
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Maciej one50123164e...@getonemail.com wrote:
Does anyone have any clue what that might be?
Why the problem is on GAE (even when run locally), when command line
run works just fine (even with recursion limit decreased)?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Most
On 07/02/2010 06:11 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I would like to better understand some of the design choices made in
collections.defaultdict.
Firstly, to initialise a defaultdict, you do this:
from collections import defaultdict
d = defaultdict(callable, *args)
which sets an attribute
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Thomas Jollans tho...@jollans.com wrote:
On 07/02/2010 06:11 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I would like to better understand some of the design choices made in
collections.defaultdict.
snip
Second, why is the factory function not called with key? There are three
On 07/02/2010 11:26 AM, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Thomas Jollans tho...@jollans.com wrote:
On 07/02/2010 06:11 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I would like to better understand some of the design choices made in
collections.defaultdict.
snip
Second, why is the factory
WANG Cong wrote:
However, I think setattr() is a builtin function, using it exposes the
*magic* of metaprogramming (or class-programming, if more correct) at a
first glance.
But, in Python, creating instance variables is *not*
class-programming. It doesn't touch the class at all.
In many OO
WANG Cong a écrit :
On 07/01/10 23:19, Stephen Hansen me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io wrote:
As long as setattr() exists in Python, that will be not so ordinary. :)
setattr is perfectly ordinary.
If you think setattr() is as ordinary as a trivial assignment,
setattr IS a trivial assignment.
WANG Cong a écrit :
On 06/30/10 01:25, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
But if so why setattr() still exists? What is it for if we can do the
same thing via assignments? Also, in order to be perfect, Python should
accept to add dynamic attributes dynamically, something like PEP
363. That
On 02-07-2010 09:39, geremy condra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Curious if any of you are using GPG or PGP encryption and/or signatures
in your Python apps?
Yes; disclaimer: I'm the author of evpy and am currently working on a
openssl wrapper proposed
* Dave Pawson dave.paw...@gmail.com [2010-07-02 08:22]:
I'm the OP btw.
On 1 July 2010 18:10, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I think that Python could be a alternative to bash and have some
advantages, but it's a long way off from being fully implemented.
Take a look
syockit wrote:
I've been playing around with custom iterators to map into Pool. When
I run the code below:
def arif(arr):
return arr
def permutate(n):
k = 0
a = list(range(6))
while kn:
for i in range(6):
a.insert(0, a.pop(5)+6)
#yield
syockit wrote:
I've been playing around with custom iterators to map into Pool. When
I run the code below:
def arif(arr):
return arr
def permutate(n):
k = 0
a = list(range(6))
while kn:
for i in range(6):
a.insert(0, a.pop(5)+6)
#yield a[:] --
On Jul 2, 6:04 am, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
The csv module imports from _csv, which suggests to me that there's code
written in C which thinks that the \x00 is a NUL terminator, so it's a
bug, although it's very unusual to want to write characters like \x00
to a CSV file, and I
On 2 July 2010 05:10, D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@druid.net wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:34:15 +0300
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm one of them. Gmail is great for mailing lists, though I would
never use it as a personal email client. But I'm more of a lurker than
a poster on this
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Hmmm Well, as this is my first ever bug post (yay! ;)
Great!
I *think* this is what you want:
http://bugs.python.org/issue9121
I believe Benjamin meant that it was already fixed in
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:52 PM Jay said...
pywinauto looks to be almost perfect. All I need now is to read the
numbers uncovered when a minesweeper square is clicked on, or that I
just hit a mine.
... or, you could always win...
Ethan Furman ha scritto:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:52 PM Jay said...
pywinauto looks to be almost perfect. All I need now is to read the
numbers uncovered when a minesweeper square is clicked on, or that I
just hit a mine.
... or, you
hello, friendliest prog lang community on earth ;)
i'm feeling that
(0) delegation pattern thru descriptor encourages dedicated delegate
for each task, if feeling: print(benefits)
(1) the delegate is designed to be blind about the class on which the
delegate is attached to
isn't that the two
On 07/01/2010 08:57 AM, Alan wrote:
I know drag drop is not possible with TK.
Is this a Python Tk limitation or a Tk limitation in general? Google
suggests that Tk itself supports some form of dnd.
Which widget could I use for my
python application to be able to work with drag drop?
PyQt
Hello Everyone..
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04, i try to install Python 2.4.2 Python 2.4.3 got
error message while doing make command. anybody can tell tell, How to
overcome this error Finally i got message like this ...
4036e000-403ad000 r--p 08:08 156978
/usr/lib/locale/en_IN/LC_CTYPE
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:28:59 -0700, kedra marbun wrote:
hello, friendliest prog lang community on earth ;)
i'm feeling that
(0) delegation pattern thru descriptor encourages dedicated delegate for
each task, if feeling: print(benefits) (1) the delegate is designed to
be blind about the
On 07/02/2010 05:38 PM, Dhilip S wrote:
Hello Everyone..
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04, i try to install Python 2.4.2 Python 2.4.3 got
error message while doing make command. anybody can tell tell, How to
overcome this error Finally i got message like this ...
4036e000-403ad000 r--p
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Stef Mientki stef.mien...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02-07-2010 09:39, geremy condra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Curious if any of you are using GPG or PGP encryption and/or signatures
in your Python apps?
Yes; disclaimer: I'm
Okay, so!
I actually never quite got around to learning to do deep and useful
magic with decorators. I've only ever done the most basic things with
them. Its all been a little fuzzy in my head: things like what order
decorators end up being called in if there's more then one, etc.
But in my
I define
ninv = 1.0/n
...where n is some integer, and I want to write some function f such
that f(m * ninv) returns the smallest integer that is = m * ninv,
where m is some other integer. And, in particular, if m is p*n
for some integer p, then f((p*n) * ninv) should return the integer
p.
I'd like to have the following structure of my Python code:
I have a directory called 'mysystem'. In this directory, I have files
'comp1.zip' and 'comp2.zip' etc which are zipped archives with python
packages and modules.
I'd like to be able to use them like this in my code:
import
Please disregard my ineptly posed question.
~K
In i0l9f3$7d...@reader1.panix.com kj no.em...@please.post writes:
I define
ninv = 1.0/n
...where n is some integer, and I want to write some function f such
that f(m * ninv) returns the smallest integer that is = m * ninv,
where m is some
A quick reminder that there's one week left to submit your abstract for
this year's Surge Scalability Conference. The event is taking place on
Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Surge focuses on case studies
that address production failures and the re-engineering efforts that led
to
Emacs For Python 0.1
Emacs for python (epy) is a collection of emacs extensions for python
development, yet ready and configured for you.
It includes also tweaks to commonly used extension to provide extra
functionality and fast bug correction. There are also sane configuration
that helps you
On 07/02/2010 07:41 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Okay, so!
I actually never quite got around to learning to do deep and useful
magic with decorators. I've only ever done the most basic things with
them. Its all been a little fuzzy in my head: things like what order
decorators end up being
I like to think of decorators with arguments as decorator factory functions.
I try and unroll them as much as possible... I have some decorators that
work like so (and please note that the wraps and returns_as_output are
separate so that I can mutate the behavior as needed, if you just wanted a
* Stephen Hansen, on 02.07.2010 19:41:
Okay, so!
I actually never quite got around to learning to do deep and useful
magic with decorators. I've only ever done the most basic things with
them. Its all been a little fuzzy in my head: things like what order
decorators end up being called in if
David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think one point which needs to be emphasized more is what does
python 3 bring to people. The what's new in python 3 page gives
the impression that python 3 is about removing cruft. That's a very
poor argument to push people to switch.
That's the
On 07/02/2010 09:07 PM, John Nagle wrote:
What I'm not seeing is a deployment plan along these lines:
1.Identify key modules which must be converted before Python 3
can be used in production environments.
That depends VERY strongly on the environment in question.
2.
On Jul 2, 10:41 am, Stephen Hansen me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io wrote:
Okay, so!
I actually never quite got around to learning to do deep and useful
magic with decorators. I've only ever done the most basic things with
them. Its all been a little fuzzy in my head: things like what order
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:46:41 -0700
Zac Burns zac...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience it is far more expensive to allocate a lock in python then
it is the types that use them. Here are some examples:
timeit.timeit('Lock()', 'from threading import Lock')
1.4449114807669048
Does anyone have any clue what that might be?
Why the problem is on GAE (even when run locally), when command line
run works just fine (even with recursion limit decreased)?
Can't explain why you see different behavior on GAE vs. local, but it
is unusual for a small translator to flirt with
On Jul 2, 12:07 pm, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
This has all been said before.
Yes, we know. And when no one did anything about it the first dozen
times it's been said, it wasn't because we didn't hear it, it was
because we didn't care. We still don't care now, and won't care no
On 7/1/2010 10:18 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:17 PM Terry Reedy said...
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:52 PM Jay said...
pywinauto looks to be almost perfect. All I need now is to read the
numbers uncovered when a minesweeper square is clicked on,
On Jul 2, 6:17 am, superpollo ute...@esempio.net wrote:
Ethan Furman ha scritto:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:52 PM Jay said...
pywinauto looks to be almost perfect. All I need now is to read the
numbers uncovered when a minesweeper
On Jul 2, 2:13 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/1/2010 10:18 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:17 PM Terry Reedy said...
On 7/1/2010 6:42 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:52 PM Jay said...
pywinauto looks to be almost perfect. All I need now is to read
In article 4c2e38f5.10...@animats.com, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3.
webfaction.com has python3.1
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) * http://www.pythoncraft.com/
If you don't know what your program is
On Jul 1, 3:30 pm, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk wrote:
If this is a version of your code that actually fails when you run it
(rather than being another artistic interpretation of a photograph of your
code :-), then I'd go with Matt's analysis. This will give you a
Hi,
I'm trying to write a simple script which displays the basic details
of a person's mailbox. My problem is that it causes all the messages
to be marked as read on the server, which is not what I'm after, and I
also can't get the imap.sort command to work properly (currently
commented out as I
On 7/2/2010 2:38 PM Jay said...
OK, so how does a program read the pixel?
Well, you start with a screen capture utility. I'd check is pywinauto
provides that access...
Emile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
why pure python don't support extended slice direct assignment for lists?
today we have to write like this,
aList=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
aList
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
aList[::2]= [None]*len(aList[::2]) #or do the math by hand, what's not
always possible
aList
[None, 1, None, 3, None,
John Nagle na...@animats.com writes:
Where's the business case for moving to Python 3? It's not faster.
It's faster to learn, because there's less to learn.
How do you know that it's not faster? That's a matter of the speed of
individual Python implementations. What data do you have?
It
On 7/2/2010 3:00 PM, Aahz wrote:
In article4c2e38f5.10...@animats.com, John Naglena...@animats.com wrote:
5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3.
webfaction.com has python3.1
WebFaction's big thing is that they have a really good system for
installing
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:07:33 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Where's the business case for moving to Python 3? It's not faster. It
doesn't do anything you can't do in Python 2.6. There's no killer app
for it. End of life for Python 2.x is many years away; most server Linux
distros aren't even
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:11:49 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I would like to better understand some of the design choices made in
collections.defaultdict.
[...]
Thanks to all who replied.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Robert William Hanks
astroultra...@gmail.com wrote:
why pure python don't support extended slice direct assignment for lists?
today we have to write like this,
aList=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
aList
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
aList[::2]=
Hi,
I have a huge dict structure like below:
*
{'module':{'reg_dict_0':{'name':'abc','reg_addr':'2004'},'reg_dict_1':{'name':'xyz','reg_addr':'2002'},'reg_dict_2':{'name':'pqr','reg_addr':'2008'}}
*
Module dict and reg_dicts contain many elements than shown.
I want to sort this 'module'
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:07:33 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Where's the business case for moving to Python 3? It's not faster. It
doesn't do anything you can't do in Python 2.6. There's no killer app
Hi all,
I have a serious problem I want to solve. My app, where
Python is embedded crashs on OSX (10.6 SL). I can reproduce the crash
sometimes with a script that makes use of Python threads ( module:
threading).
'thelock-locked' is for sure still locked, but I can't identify the
problem.
Its
Robert William Hanks wrote:
why pure python don't support extended slice direct assignment for lists?
today we have to write like this,
aList=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
aList
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
aList[::2]= [None]*len(aList[::2]) #or do the math by hand, what's
not always
abhijeet thatte wrote:
Hi,
I have a huge dict structure like below:
/*{'module':{'reg_dict_0':{'name':'abc','reg_addr':'2004'},'reg_dict_1':{'name':'xyz','reg_addr':'2002'},'reg_dict_2':{'name':'pqr','reg_addr':'2008'}}*/
Module dict and reg_dicts contain many elements than shown.
I want to
In article d52edb82-4de5-496d-8807-b5d15ee66...@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
moerchendiser2k3 googler.1.webmas...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Do I need to implement both? Looks very redundant, isnt it? Or is it
just an extension and tp_richcompare is the better choice here? Can
anyone please make
In article 4c2e79d3$0$1663$742ec...@news.sonic.net,
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
On 7/2/2010 3:00 PM, Aahz wrote:
In article4c2e38f5.10...@animats.com, John Naglena...@animats.com wrote:
5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3.
webfaction.com has
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:48:47 -0400
pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Curious if any of you are using GPG or PGP encryption and/or
signatures in your Python apps?
...
4. generating signatures for files that you are exchanging/posting for
download?
I use pyme to create and check save file signatures.
to say is wrong i think is a bit too much, its just a different type of
usage, this type of sintax is extensively used in numpy arrays (extended
slice came from numerical python), just asking why not extend the sintax to
python list. (not sure if you can use None as in the code i posted in numpy
In message mailman.136.1278040489.1673.python-l...@python.org, Rami
Chowdhury wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 16:50:59 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Nevertheless, it it at least self-consistent. To return to my original
macro:
#define Descr(v) v, sizeof v
As written, this works
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Robert William Hanks
astroultra...@gmail.com wrote:
to say is wrong i think is a bit too much, its just a different type of
usage, this type of sintax is extensively used in numpy arrays (extended
slice came from numerical python), just asking why not extend the
On Friday 02 July 2010 19:20:26 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.136.1278040489.1673.python-l...@python.org, Rami
Chowdhury wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010 16:50:59 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Nevertheless, it it at least self-consistent. To return to my original
macro:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Gregory Ewing
greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Carl Banks wrote:
Indeed, strncpy does not copy that final NUL if it's at or beyond the
nth element. Probably the most mind-bogglingly stupid thing about the
standard C library, which has lots of mind-boggling
On 7/2/2010 3:07 PM, John Nagle wrote:
That's the real issue, not parentheses on the print statement.
Where's the business case for moving to Python 3? It's not faster.
It doesn't do anything you can't do in Python 2.6.
False. One cannot run code in 2.6 that depends on bugfixes in 3.1. Nor
On 2 Jul 2010 15:00:17 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3.
webfaction.com has python3.1
So does http://www.Vex.Net/ so there's your two.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@druid.net | Democracy is three wolves
On 7/2/10 11:55 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
Looks good! You may still want to use functools.update_wrapper or
functools.wraps on wrap.
Are you sure? I've been doing a little bit of experimentation and I only
did the 'wraps' on that inner function, because it seemed that it was
all that was needed
On 7/2/10 11:58 AM, Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet wrote:
code
#Py3
I'm stuck on Python 2.x, as I mentioned (albeit only in a comment). That
said this code does not seem to be including any Py3isms that aren't
compatible.
class Thing(object):
@expose()
def test1(self, arg1):
On 7/2/2010 9:10 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On 2 Jul 2010 15:00:17 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3.
webfaction.com has python3.1
So does http://www.Vex.Net/ so there's your two.
Not according to Vex's
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment:
The new junk heuristic has been added to difflib.py in SVN revision 26661 in
2002 (which is, incidentally, the last revision to modify difflib.py). Its
commit log says:
-
Mostly in
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
2.5 compatibility is fine for the 2.x version of decimal.py.
For the 3.x version of decimal.py, I don't see what it buys us.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9137
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's a fix.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +rhettinger
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17834/issue9137.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9137
Changes by Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file17831/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9136
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
And what about this?
x.update(self=5)
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9137
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah. Good point.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9137
___
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Updated patch, to deal with 'self' correctly too.
--
stage: needs patch - patch review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17835/issue9137_v2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
The examples seem good to me after a quick reading. There’s not too much but
still enough.
I find the phrasing of the versionchanged not easily understandable:
“The position of the arguments can now be omitted.”
Clearer and probably too verbose:
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
In the new patches I reinstated the ternary construct. I think it
would be nice to use dict comprehensions in py3k. People read the
stdlib for guidance, and it would help if ultimately only the most
concise idioms remained in py3k.
If
Changes by Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17837/issue9136-trunk-3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9136
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Ralph, core developers have not rejected this idea. It needs a patch now (even
rough) to get the discussion further.
--
components: +Library (Lib) -Interpreter Core
___
Python tracker
New submission from Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com:
The GC module currently relies only on the presence of a __del__ method to
decide if an object can be safely collected at all. Also, there is a special
case for generator objects.
This patch allows any object to call an api
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
First, what's the use case? Just backporting an internal Stackless API isn't a
reasonable request.
Second, this tells that there *is* a finalization function, but not what the
function is. How is the GC supposed to find it?
Third, the
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I see no problem in going ahead with the suggestion proposed and the patch.
- I checked with RFC3986 Section 2.5
http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#identifying-data
Relevant line:
When a new URI scheme defines a component
Scott Dial sc...@scottdial.com added the comment:
disassemble_str should be private with an underscore.
disassemble_string should've been private as well, while we are editing this
module.
--
nosy: +scott.dial
___
Python tracker
New submission from rajesh rajcha...@gmail.com:
while executing the python file:
python sercon.py
It Displays the below error.kindly provide me the solution.
Updated the Configparser log
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry; this tracker is for reporting bugs in Python, not for getting help with
your own Python code.
There are other places you might be able to get help, for example the
python-list mailing list[1], which is also available as a
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
