On 12/10/2010 4:52 AM, small Pox wrote:
[... irrelevant stuff...]
I advocate neither anti semitism nor pro semitism. just the rule of
law that treats people equally and fairly and where money does not
count. this cannot be achieved without demolishing fractional reserve
lending, and not
On Dec 10, 11:55 am, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
# By the way, IOError is not the only exception you could see.
thanks for the help Steven. Is it OK to catch Exception instead of
IOError ?
In some operation which can cause many errors ,can I use the
mark jason wrote:
hi
I was trying out some file operations and was trying to open a non
existing file as below
def do_work(filename):
try:
f = open(filename,r);
print 'opened'
except IOError, e:
print 'failed',e.message
finally:
f.close()
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Some changes are being proposed to how logging works in default
configurations.
Briefly - when a logging event occurs which needs to be output to some
log, the behaviour of the logging package when no explicit logging
configuration is provided will change, most likely to log
Hi all,
I'm a novice learner of python and get caught in the following trouble and
hope experienced users can help me solve it:)
Code:
---
$ cat Muffle_ZeroDivision.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
class MuffledCalculator:
muffled
mark jason wrote:
On Dec 10, 11:55 am, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
# By the way, IOError is not the only exception you could see.
thanks for the help Steven. Is it OK to catch Exception instead of
IOError ?
In some operation which can cause many
Hi, all,
Python critique from strchr.com:
http://www.strchr.com/python_critique
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, frank cui wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a novice learner of python and get caught in the following trouble and
hope experienced users can help me solve it:)
Code:
---
$ cat Muffle_ZeroDivision.py
#!/usr/bin/env
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:17:33 +0100
Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Why would you log informative messages to stderr ? (debug, info, warning)
How stderr is a better choice than stdout ?
By construction really. stderr is initially for errors, but it is
generally used for out
Thanks for that. I'll try and see if it makes any difference but I'm using
python 2.6 not 3
Are the multiprocessing modules different? That code (or whatever is using
the multiprocessing module) seems to cause infinite python processes on my
machine and eventually kills it.
I'm running python 2.6
I just saw this:
http://bugs.python.org/issue8094
which seem to be similar to what I'm having. Does anyone know if there is a
fix for it?
Thanks again
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Astan Chee astan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for that. I'll try and see if it makes any difference but I'm
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
I can't replicate the crash. However, your problem looks like there is a
ready-to-use solution:
http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#using-a-pool-of-workers
--
It is true that Python doesn't use scope limitations for variables?
Octavian
- Original Message -
From: kolo 32 kala32k...@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
To: python-list@python.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:31 PM
Subject: Python critique
Hi, all,
Python critique
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You guys are right. If I disable the gc it will use all the virtual RAM in
my test.
The application I have been running these tests for is a port of a program
written in a LISP-based tool running on Unix.
It does a mass of stress calculations.
The port has been written using a python-based
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Dirk Nachbar dirk...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
b = a[:] will create a copy of the list. If the elements of the list
are references to mutable objects (objects
b = list(a)
or
b = a[:]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Freitag 10 Dezember 2010, Dirk Nachbar wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
b=a[:]
--
Wolfgang
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
It is true that Python doesn't use scope limitations for variables?
Octavian
Python does have scope. The problem is not the lack of scope, to
problem is the shadow declaration of some python construct in the
current scope.
print x # raise NameError
[x for x in
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:21:45 +, Mark Wooding wrote:
John Nagle na...@animats.com writes:
sort has failed because it assumes that a b and b c implies a
c. But that's not a valid assumption here.
It's not good to break
Dirk Nachbar wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
In [1]: a = [1,2,3]
In [2]: b = a[:]
In [3]: b[0] = 5
In [4]: a
Out[4]: [1, 2, 3]
In [5]: b
Out[5]: [5, 2, 3]
Alternatively, you can write
import copy
On Dec 10, 1:56 pm, Wolfgang Rohdewald wolfg...@rohdewald.de wrote:
On Freitag 10 Dezember 2010, Dirk Nachbar wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
b=a[:]
--
Wolfgang
I did that but then some
Jean-Michel Pichavant, 10.12.2010 15:02:
the shadow declaration of some python construct in the current scope.
print x # raise NameError
[x for x in range(10)] # shadow declaration of x
print x # will print 9
Note that this is rarely a problem in practice, and that this has been
fixed in
On Freitag 10 Dezember 2010, Dirk Nachbar wrote:
b=a[:]
--
Wolfgang
I did that but then some things I do with b happen to a as
well.
as others said, this is no deep copy. So if you do something
to an element in b, and if the same element is in a, both
are changed as they are still
Hello ... I'm using buildbot to build some of my projects. I'm
having problems when I configure it and I think it might be with the
python configuration on my pc:
I'm getting this error:
Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/buildbot, line 3, in
from buildbot.scripts import
From: Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
It is true that Python doesn't use scope limitations for variables?
Octavian
Python does have scope. The problem is not the lack of scope, to
problem is the shadow declaration of some python construct in the
On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with
deprecation warnings
Heres the (first) set
DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash__
in 3.x
DeprecationWarning: callable() not supported in 3.x;
On Dec 10, 6:06 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Dirk Nachbar wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
In [1]: a = [1,2,3]
In [2]: b = a[:]
In [3]: b[0] = 5
In [4]: a
Out[4]:
On Dec 10, 11:17 am, nn prueba...@latinmail.com wrote:
On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with
deprecation warnings
Heres the (first) set
DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash__
On 10/12/2010 16:17, nn wrote:
On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, rusirustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with
deprecation warnings
Heres the (first) set
DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash__
in 3.x
DeprecationWarning:
On Dec 10, 9:17 pm, nn prueba...@latinmail.com wrote:
On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with
deprecation warnings
Heres the (first) set
DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash__
in
On Dec 10, 10:53 am, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
Ive installed python 2.7
And trace still ignores my ignore-module etc requests
Is this a know bug with the trace module?
I find it hard to believe that as traces naturally tend to get huge
unless carefully trimmed
--
On Dec 10, 8:48 am, Dirk Nachbar dirk...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
and then do things with b which don't affect a.
How can I do this?
Dirk
Not knowing the particulars,
you may have to use:
import copy
b=copy.deepcopy(a)
--
Has anyone ever built some sort of optparse/argparse module for cgi/
wsgi programs? I can see why a straight port wouldn't work, but a
module that can organize parameter handling for web pages seems like a
good idea, especially if it provided a standard collection of both
client- and server-side
I just started using distutils to install the modules I'm working on
to site-packages. Now, however, if I make changes in my development
directory, then import the modules into python, it always loads up the
installed version. Thus, I can't continue development without first
uninstalling the
In my system (Ubuntu 10.04) there are sage-4.6, python 2.6.5, tk8.5-
dev installed. When I give command from terminal sage -f
python-2.6.5.p8 to get sage's python it shows following message:
No command 'sage' found, did you mean:
Command 'save' from package 'atfs' (universe)
Command 'page'
On Dec 10, 9:57 am, hoesley hoes...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started using distutils to install the modules I'm working on
to site-packages. Now, however, if I make changes in my development
directory, then import the modules into python, it always loads up the
installed version. Thus, I can't
cassiope wrote:
Alternatively, you can write
import copy
a = [1,2,3]
b = a.copy()
JM
I'm not a pyguru, but... you didn't use copy quite right.
Try instead: b= copy.copy(a)
You're right, you're not a python guru so don't even try to contradict
me ever again.
...
:D of course I
On Dec 10, 10:17 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Hi Jean-Michel,
I think Antoine answered your other points, so I'll address the last
one:
Last question, if no handler is found, why not simply drop the log
event, doing nothing ? It sounds pretty reasonable and less
For Programming puzzles visit the blog
http://coders-stop.blogspot.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I manged to get my python app past 3GB on a smaller 64 bit machine.
On a test to check memory usage with gc disabled only an extra 6MB was used.
The figures were 1693MB to 1687MB.
This is great.
Thanks again for the help.
On 10 December 2010 13:54, Rob Randall rob.randa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Ian ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 10, 9:57 am, hoesley hoes...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started using distutils to install the modules I'm working on
to site-packages. Now, however, if I make changes in my development
directory, then import the modules
On 10/12/2010 17:52, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:02:24 +1100, Astan Cheeastan.c...@gmail.com
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
for thread in threads:
if not thread.is_alive():
threads.remove(thread)
I can
I've a character encoding issue that has stumped me (not that hard to
do). I am parsing a small text file with some possibility of various
currencies being involved, and want to handle them without messing up.
Initially I was simply doing:
currs = [u'$', u'£', u'€', u'¥']
aFile =
On Dec 8, 6:26 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
There isn't a way to limit access to a single process. mkdtemp creates
the directory with mode 0700 and thus limits it to the (effective) user
of the current process. Any process of the same user is able to access
the directory.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=20060212articleId=1955
Evgeny Chossudovsky: Writer with a distinguished UN career
Global Research, February 12, 2006
The Irish Times - 2006-01-18
Throughout his UN career and until his death, Evgeny Chossudovsky
expressed his firm
On 12/10/2010 2:31 AM, kolo 32 wrote:
Hi, all,
Python critique from strchr.com:
http://www.strchr.com/python_critique
I have criticisms of Python, but those aren't them.
Probably the biggest practical problem with CPython is
that C modules have to be closely matched to the version of
On Dec 10, 2:51 pm, Ross ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Initially I was simply doing:
currs = [u'$', u'£', u'€', u'¥']
aFile = open(thisFile, 'r')
for mline in aFile: # mline might be £5.50
if item[0] in currs:
item = item[1:]
Don't you love it when someone
Dirk Nachbar dirk...@gmail.com writes:
I want to take a copy of a list a
b=a
In addition to the other good replies you've received:
To take a copy of an object, the answer is never ‘b = a’. That binds a
reference ‘b’ to the same object referenced by ‘a’.
The assignment operator ‘=’ never
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:51:44 -0800, Ross wrote:
Since I can't control the encoding of the input file that users
submit, how to I get past this? How do I make such comparisons be
True?
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:07:19 -0800, Ross wrote:
I found I could import codecs that allow me to read the
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Astan Chee astan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
I can't replicate the crash. However, your problem looks like there is a
ready-to-use solution:
Hello list,
Recently someone asked me this question, to which I could not give an
answer. I'm hoping for some insight, or a manual page. What follows is
python 2.6.
The problem is with the difference between
from test import *
and
import test
First things first. Here's the code to
On Dec 10, 3:06 pm, Stefaan Himpe stefaan.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow, in the first session I cannot modify the global variable a
returned from f, but in the second session I can. To my eye, the only
difference seems to be a namespace. Can anyone shine some light on this
matter?
It's not
On 12/10/2010 2:22 PM Ian said...
On Dec 10, 3:06 pm, Stefaan Himpestefaan.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow, in the first session I cannot modify the global variable a
returned from f, but in the second session I can. To my eye, the only
difference seems to be a namespace. Can anyone shine some
ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.1.3.5, a complete,
ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.1.
http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads
What's New in ActivePython-3.1.3.5
==
*Release date: 6-Dec-2010*
New Features
From: John Nagle na...@animats.com
On 12/10/2010 2:31 AM, kolo 32 wrote:
Hi, all,
Python critique from strchr.com:
http://www.strchr.com/python_critique
I have criticisms of Python, but those aren't them.
Probably the biggest practical problem with CPython is
that C modules have
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:02:21 -0800
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Probably the biggest practical problem with CPython is
that C modules have to be closely matched to the version of
CPython. There's no well-defined API that doesn't change.
Please stop spreading FUD:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Nagle na...@animats.com
On 12/10/2010 2:31 AM, kolo 32 wrote:
Hi, all,
Python critique from strchr.com:
http://www.strchr.com/python_critique
I have criticisms of Python, but those aren't them.
John Nagle, 10.12.2010 21:02:
Probably the biggest practical problem with CPython is
that C modules have to be closely matched to the version of
CPython. There's no well-defined API that doesn't change.
Well, there are no huge differences between CPython versions (apart from
the Py_ssize_t
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:46:41 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
How narrow are the scopes in Python?
Is each block (each level of indentation) a scope?
Thankfully, no.
If it is, then I
think it is very enough because the other cases can be detected easier
or it might not appear at all in a
Benjamin Kaplan, 11.12.2010 00:13:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
How narrow are the scopes in Python?
Is each block (each level of indentation) a scope?
If it is, then I think it is very enough because the other cases can be
detected easier or it might not appear at
Hi everyone,
I've been experimenting with the ctypes module and think it's great.
I'm hitting a few snags though with seg faults. I attached two links
that holds the code. The line i'm having problems with is this,
sn=clibsmi.smiGetNextNode(pointer(sno),SMI_NODEKIND_ANY)
It will work one
On 12/10/2010 3:25 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Benjamin Kaplan, 11.12.2010 00:13:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
The only scopes Python has are module and function.
There's more. Both a lambda, and in Python 3.x,
list comprehensions, introduce a new scope.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:51 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 3:25 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Benjamin Kaplan, 11.12.2010 00:13:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
The only scopes Python has are module and function.
There's more. Both a lambda,
John Nagle, 11.12.2010 00:51:
On 12/10/2010 3:25 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Benjamin Kaplan, 11.12.2010 00:13:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
The only scopes Python has are module and function.
There's more. Both a lambda, and in Python 3.x,
list comprehensions,
geremy condra wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Astan Chee astan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
I can't replicate the crash. However, your problem looks like there is a
ready-to-use solution:
Hi Experts,
got ready made code for ssh to unix using python
host machine is windows now when i run this its gives following error :
*
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Python26\pexpect-2.1\pexpect-2.1\pxssh.py, line 1, in module
from pexpect import *
File
News Wombat newswom...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:2abdd9b3-66ec-4125-a5f8-41315008c...@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Hi everyone,
I've been experimenting with the ctypes module and think it's great.
I'm hitting a few snags though with seg faults. I attached two links
that holds the
Sorry about that, here is a summary of my complete code. I haven't cleaned
it up much or anything, but this is what it does:
import time
import multiprocessing
test_constx =0
test_consty =0
def functionTester(x):
global test_constx
global test_consty
print constx + str(test_constx)
New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
When searching docs (e.g. for
http://docs.python.org/dev/search.html?q=unicodecheck_keywords=yesarea=default)
I'd like to filter out C API.
--
assignee: d...@python
components: Documentation
messages: 123719
nosy: d...@python,
Hervé Cauwelier he...@itaapy.com added the comment:
Thanks for the example. The Python 2.7 documentation about the mini-language
doesn't clearly state that it is extensible and how. we see examples of
formatting but not of extending.
Your example would be welcome in the documentation.
Changes by Daniel Urban urban.dani...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +durban
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10667
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment:
Are the warnings originating in your code, or in the standard library, or
elsewhere?
If in the standard library, please provide specific details.
--
nosy: +eric.smith
___
Python tracker
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Fixed in r87156.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10668
___
Ray.Allen ysj@gmail.com added the comment:
That's good if it's so... can you explain why list_clear doesn't
guarantee that the list is empty? Why would XDECREF populate the list?
I don't quite understand it.
Does this mean that durning the Py_DECREF progress the list may be populated
Rusi rustompm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Eric
Sorry for not being clear.
This is more of a feature request than a bug report as suggested by Terry
Reedy on the python mailing list (see here
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-December/1262149.html
The warnings are in my
Mher Movsisyan mher.movsis...@gmail.com added the comment:
The attached patch fixes crashes on bad input. The patch implements validation
for dict and array elements as well as some resource cleanup. The tests are
included as well.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +mher
Added file:
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
At the moment exception handling for setUp / tearDown / testMethod and cleanUp
functions are all handled separately. They all have to call addError and as a
result we have inconsistent handling of skips, expected failures (etc). There
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I've added the logging code to implement and use a logger of last resort as
discussed on the thread for http://bit.ly/last-resort-handler into the py3k
branch, r87157. Gist of differences is available at
https://gist.github.com/736120 -
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
s/logger of last resort/handler of last resort/
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10626
___
New submission from Kirill Subbotin kir...@gmail.com:
When you open url which redirects to another host (either with 301 or 302),
HTTPRedirectHandler keeps Host header from the previous request, which leads
to a error. Instead a host should be taken from a new location url.
Attached patch is
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Can you point me to your code and error traceback that was observed and some
details about server which gave 301/302 Redirect as what was the hostname and
where did it redirect to?
I don't see the code changes that you provided in the
New submission from Mayweed norman.dena...@atosorigin.com:
In the documentation, the statement with is marked as:
New in version 2.5.
(http://docs.python.org/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-with-statement)
This new statement is new in version 2.6 !
--
assignee: d...@python
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
It is in fact new in 2.5, but only available when using from __future__ import
with_statement, which the note near the end of the section details.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
New submission from Brian Cain brian.c...@gmail.com:
When calling Process' join([timeout]) method, the timeout expiration case is
indistinguishable from the successful join. I suppose the 'exitcode' attribute
can deliver the necessary information, but perhaps join could stand on its own.
If
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
distutils2.log has been removed in f6ef30a22a24.
I’m leaving this open to remind us we want to remove the warn and announce
methods. Logging all the way!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
My guess is it shouldn't, and yes, but I've added the multiprocessing
maintainers as nosy and they can answer definitively.
--
nosy: +asksol, jnoller, r.david.murray
___
Python tracker
Ask Solem a...@opera.com added the comment:
While it makes sense for `join` to raise an error on timeout, that could
possibly break existing code, so I don't think that is an option. Adding a
note in the documentation would be great.
--
___
Python
Giovanni Bajo giovannib...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Gregory, I saw your commit here:
http://code.activestate.com/lists/python-checkins/91914/
This basically means that in 3.2 it is mandatory to specify close_fds to avoid
a DeprecationWarning. *BUT* there is no good value that works both
New submission from Ori Avtalion o...@avtalion.name:
Using trunk r87157
The Grammar/Grammar file defines a dictmaker symbol that is no longer
referenced in any other symbol. It should be removed.
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 123738
nosy: salty-horse
priority: normal
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - d...@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +d...@python, ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10669
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Ok, closing as invalid.
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10644
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
Please, one issue per report and checkin,
The s/5.2/6.0/ issue is hardly worth a tracker ticket. I've
committed these changes in r87159.
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, haypo, lemburg
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10665
___
Milko Krachounov pyt...@milko.3mhz.net added the comment:
I'd offer two ideas.
1. Add a constant DISREGARD_FDS to the subprocess module could help. It would
allow the user to specify his intent, and let the implementation choose the
best action. Popen(..., close_fds=subprocess.DISREGARD_FDS)
Milko Krachounov pyt...@milko.3mhz.net added the comment:
The cloexec approach still doesn't help with issue 2320. In fact, with
threading and people calling subprocess from multiple threads, *this* issue
wouldn't be fixed with my patch either unless mutexes are used. It's impossible
to avoid
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10674
___
___
Giovanni Bajo giovannib...@gmail.com added the comment:
Setting CLOEXEC on the pipes seems like a very good fix for this bug. I'm +1 on
it, but I think it should be the default; instead, your proposed patch adds a
new argument to the public API. Why do you think it's necessary to do so?
At
Changes by Milko Krachounov pyt...@milko.3mhz.net:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file1/subprocess-cloexec-py3k.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7213
___
Milko Krachounov pyt...@milko.3mhz.net added the comment:
I'm +1 on it, but I think it should be the default; instead,
your proposed patch adds a new argument to the public API. Why do you
think it's necessary to do so?
I don't think it's necessary. I put it there because when I was
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
