An alternative approach:
http://pastebin.com/z6pNqFYE
or:
# devpla...@gmail.com
# 2011-Nov-15
# recordimports.py
# my Import Hook Hack in response to:
#
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/5a5d5c724f142eb5?hl=en
# as an initial learning exercise
# This code ne
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Jason Swails wrote:
> Of course! Windows are widgets just like everything else is, and so can be
> configured to be in the DISABLED state just like a button can. I'm not used
> to this hierarchy in which the root window presides over all, yet is still a
> widget
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jason Swails
> wrote:
> > Then, I can reactivate all of the buttons in the destroy() method before
> > calling the destroy() method of Toplevel on self.
>
> Small side point that might save you some work: I
I thought that the point of the else clause is that it is reached only
if there is no exception in the try clause.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> If you need lookup only I'd prefer tuples, but sometimes you may want to
> retrieve all values with a certain k1 and
>
> d[k1]
>
> is certainly more efficient than
>
> [(k2, v) for (k1, k2), v in d.items() if k1 == wanted]
This was the hidden cost of the tup
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:00:38 -0800, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> Oops, I stripped so much out of my example that I stripped the ugly bit.
> This is closer to the original and demonstrated the issue:
>
> def timeMethod(func):
> name = func.__name__ + "Duration"
> def wrapper(self, *args, **key
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:59:39 -0800, DevPlayer wrote:
> What I don't get is, having seen Python's syntax with indentation
> instead of open and closing puncuation and other -readability-
> structures in Python's syntax, is if someone is going to invent any new
> language, how could they NOT take Py
I believe Occam had a visual structure and was compiled. In fact it was
even more picky than Python in this respect IIRC.
On 11/14/2011 4:28 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, DevPlayer wrote:
What I don't get is, having seen Python's syntax with indentation
instead
In article
,
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> > I am trying to write a decorator that times an instance method and
> > writes the results to a class member variable. For example:
> >
> > def timeMethod(func):
> > def wrapper(self, *args, **keyArgs
Thanks, all!
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, DevPlayer wrote:
> What I don't get is, having seen Python's syntax with indentation
> instead of open and closing puncuation and other -readability-
> structures in Python's syntax, is if someone is going to invent any
> new language, how could they NOT take Pyth
What I don't get is, having seen Python's syntax with indentation
instead of open and closing puncuation and other -readability-
structures in Python's syntax, is if someone is going to invent any
new language, how could they NOT take Python's visual structures (read
as readability) and copy it, wh
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, MRAB wrote:
> On 14/11/2011 21:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> The code in 'else' in a 'try/except/else[/finally]' block seems
>> pointless to me, as I am not seeing any difference between having the
>> code in the 'else' suite vs having the code in the 'try' suite.
On 14 November 2011 21:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
> The code in 'else' in a 'try/except/else[/finally]' block seems pointless to
> me, as I am not seeing any difference between having the code in the 'else'
> suite vs having the code in the 'try' suite.
>
> Can anybody shed some light on this for me?
On 14/11/2011 21:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
The code in 'else' in a 'try/except/else[/finally]' block seems
pointless to me, as I am not seeing any difference between having the
code in the 'else' suite vs having the code in the 'try' suite.
Can anybody shed some light on this for me?
The differe
The code in 'else' in a 'try/except/else[/finally]' block seems
pointless to me, as I am not seeing any difference between having the
code in the 'else' suite vs having the code in the 'try' suite.
Can anybody shed some light on this for me?
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
We, at Catalina Marketing, are in need of a Python Developer for 3 - 6
months. You'd be writing highly sophisticated scripting in OO classes
(cron) for our coupon campaigns. Also using SQLite, Oracle, and
Netezza. Prefer someone who has at least 3-5 years of Python and
database experience. The
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 12:30 -0700, Steve Edlefsen wrote:
> I did a search on files named "python" on my machine.
> There are 23 not including the ones in the Plone
> buildout-cache in my account. Seems like a lot of
> applications install their own copy of python.
>
> There are also
>
> ./usr/li
Am 14.11.2011 20:30, schrieb Steve Edlefsen:
> Sorry about that. Ubuntu 11.10.
>
> I used
>
> Plone-4.1.2-UnifiedInstaller.tar
>
> which installed o.k. I'm serving a webpage on my LAN.
>
> I did a search on files named "python" on my machine.
> There are 23 not including the ones in the Plone
Am 14.11.2011 19:28, schrieb Tobias Oberstein:
> Thanks! This is probably the most practical option I can go.
>
> I've just tested: the backported new IO on Python 2.7 will indeed
> open >32k files on FreeBSD. It also creates the files much faster.
> The old, non-monkey-patched version was getting
Sorry about that. Ubuntu 11.10.
I used
Plone-4.1.2-UnifiedInstaller.tar
which installed o.k. I'm serving a webpage on my LAN.
I did a search on files named "python" on my machine.
There are 23 not including the ones in the Plone
buildout-cache in my account. Seems like a lot of
applications
> > I just confirmed that the bug is even there for FreeBSD 9 RC1 !
> >
> > This is most unfortunate. Seriously.
>
> W00t, that sucks! You could migrate to another BSD (NetBSD) or Linux ... :)
No, thanks;)
> > I am running out of options, since I am willing to make my stuff
> > Python 3 compatib
On 11/14/2011 10:00 AM, John Gordon wrote:
In "W. eWatson" writes:
I would think the install would make the association of py to Python,
either IDLE or the interpreter.
I would hope so too, however you did mention that you moved the python
executable to a different directory and installed a
In "W. eWatson" writes:
> I would think the install would make the association of py to Python,
> either IDLE or the interpreter.
I would hope so too, however you did mention that you moved the python
executable to a different directory and installed a newer version, so
verifying that the .py
Am 14.11.2011 18:46, schrieb Tobias Oberstein:
> I just confirmed that the bug is even there for FreeBSD 9 RC1 !
>
> This is most unfortunate. Seriously.
W00t, that sucks! You could migrate to another BSD (NetBSD) or Linux ... :)
> I am running out of options, since I am willing to make my stuff
> since i'm mostly a new-bye for as regard databases, my idea is to use
> sqlite at the beginning.
>
> Is that ok?
I think sqlite3 makes sense since it's already there and has SQL interface.
> is there any general tutorial of how to start developing a database? i
> mean a general guide to data
> > > > I need 50k sockets + 100 files.
> >
> > > > Thus, this is even more strange: the Python (a Twisted service)
> > > > will happily accept 50k sockets, but as soon as you do open() a file,
> > > > it'll
> bail out.
> >
> > > A limit of 32k smells like a overflow in a signed int. Perhaps your
On Nov 14, 5:03 pm, Tobias Oberstein
wrote:
> > > I need 50k sockets + 100 files.
>
> > > Thus, this is even more strange: the Python (a Twisted service) will
> > > happily accept 50k sockets, but as soon as you do open() a file, it'll
> > > bail out.
>
> > A limit of 32k smells like a overflow i
On 11/14/2011 8:15 AM, John Gordon wrote:
In "W. eWatson" writes:
What application is associated with .py files?
Application? Simple ones, including the one i put here that you
removed to answer my question.
Eh? I can't see anywhere that you mentioned your Windows settings as
to what ap
Am 14.11.2011 18:03, schrieb Tobias Oberstein:
> This is unbelievable.
>
> I've just tested: the bug (in libc) is still there on FreeBSD 8.2 p3 ... both
> on i386
> _and_ amd64.
>
> Now I'm f***d;(
>
> A last chance: is it possible to compile Python for not using libc fopen(),
> but the Posix o
> > I need 50k sockets + 100 files.
> >
> > Thus, this is even more strange: the Python (a Twisted service) will
> > happily accept 50k sockets, but as soon as you do open() a file, it'll bail
> > out.
>
> A limit of 32k smells like a overflow in a signed int. Perhaps your system is
> able and co
Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Tobias Oberstein:
> This is a dedicated machine doing nothing else .. I'm monitoring global FD
> usage
>
> sysctl kern.openfiles
>
> and it's way beyond the configured limit
>
> $ ulimit -n
> 20
Apparently you did everything right here. Well, it was worth the t
> I'm not familiar with BSD but Linux has similar Kernel options. The kernel
> options might be *global* flags to set the total upper limit of open file
> descriptors for the entire system, not for a single process.
> Also on Linux "ulimit" doesn't display the fd limit. You have to use "ulimit
> -
On Nov 14, 10:41 am, Tracubik wrote:
> Hi all,
> i'm developing a new program.
> Mission: learn a bit of database management
> Idea: create a simple, 1 window program that show me a db of movies i've
> seen with few (<10) fields (actors, name, year etc)
> technologies i'll use: python + gtk
> db:
Am 14.11.2011 16:57, schrieb Tobias Oberstein:
> I am trying to convince Python to open more than 32k files .. this is on
> FreeBSD.
>
> Now I know I have to set appropriate limits .. I did:
>
> $ sysctl kern.maxfiles
> kern.maxfiles: 204800
> $ sysctl kern.maxfilesperproc
> kern.maxfilesperproc
In "W. eWatson" writes:
> > What application is associated with .py files?
> Application? Simple ones, including the one i put here that you
> removed to answer my question.
Eh? I can't see anywhere that you mentioned your Windows settings as
to what application is associated with .py files.
I am trying to convince Python to open more than 32k files .. this is on
FreeBSD.
Now I know I have to set appropriate limits .. I did:
$ sysctl kern.maxfiles
kern.maxfiles: 204800
$ sysctl kern.maxfilesperproc
kern.maxfilesperproc: 20
$ sysctl kern.maxvnodes
kern.maxvnodes: 20
$ ulimit
> since i'm mostly a new-bye for as regard databases, my idea is to use
> sqlite at the beginning.
>
> Is that ok? any other db to start with? (pls don't say mysql or similar,
> they are too complex and i'll use this in a second step)
I know it's a lot of work to learn initially, but I would reco
On 11/14/2011 7:24 AM, John Gordon wrote:
In "W. eWatson" writes:
I just pushed aside the python25 folder by renaming it, and installed py
2.5.2. However, when I try to open the simplest of py programs with
IDLE, I get an error from Win7.
c:\Users\blah\...\junk.py is not a valid Win 32 app
In "W. eWatson" writes:
> I just pushed aside the python25 folder by renaming it, and installed py
> 2.5.2. However, when I try to open the simplest of py programs with
> IDLE, I get an error from Win7.
> c:\Users\blah\...\junk.py is not a valid Win 32 app.
Are you double-clicking on the .py
Honda Insight (2012)
http://newscarsblogspotcom.blogspot.com/#!/2011/11/honda-insight-2012...
Audi A2 concept (2011)
http://newscarsblogspotcom.blogspot.com/#!/2011/11/audi-a2-concept-20...
Infiniti FX designed by Sebastian Vettel (2011)
http://newscarsblogspotcom.blogspot.com/#!/2011/11/infiniti-
On 2011-11-13 23:37, goldtech wrote:
If I try:
...
soup = BeautifulSoup(ft3)
f = open(r'c:\NewFolder\clean4.html', "w")
f.write(soup)
f.close()
I get error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Documents and Settings\user01\Desktop\py\tb1a.py", line
203, in
f.write(soup)
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Tracubik wrote:
> Hi all,
> i'm developing a new program.
> Mission: learn a bit of database management
If your goal is to learn about databasing, then I strongly recommend a
real database engine.
> since i'm mostly a new-bye for as regard databases, my idea is t
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 11.11.2011 14:31, macm napsal(a):
>> def Dicty( dict[k1][k2] ):
>
> When looking at this I returned to the question which currently rolls in
> my mind:
>
> What's difference/advantage-disadvantage betweeng doing multi-level
> dicts/arrays like this and using tuple as a ke
Hi all,
i'm developing a new program.
Mission: learn a bit of database management
Idea: create a simple, 1 window program that show me a db of movies i've
seen with few (<10) fields (actors, name, year etc)
technologies i'll use: python + gtk
db: that's the question
since i'm mostly a new-bye fo
On 14/11/2011 10:05, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 11.11.2011 14:31, macm napsal(a):
def Dicty( dict[k1][k2] ):
When looking at this I returned to the question which currently rolls in
my mind:
What's difference/advantage-disadvantage betweeng doing multi-level
dicts/arrays like this and using tuple
Dne 11.11.2011 14:31, macm napsal(a):
def Dicty( dict[k1][k2] ):
When looking at this I returned to the question which currently rolls in
my mind:
What's difference/advantage-disadvantage betweeng doing multi-level
dicts/arrays like this and using tuple as a key? I.e., is it more
Pythonic
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jason Swails wrote:
> Then, I can reactivate all of the buttons in the destroy() method before
> calling the destroy() method of Toplevel on self.
Small side point that might save you some work: Instead of disabling
and enabling all the buttons, disable the whole
48 matches
Mail list logo
