Hi,
We are happy to announce the 2.6 release of Tryton.
What is Tryton
==
Tryton is a three-tiers high level general purpose application
platform using either PostgreSQL, MySQL or SQLite as database engine.
The core of Tryton (also called Tryton kernel) provides all the
necessary
On 25Oct2012 22:04, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
| Containment of nan in collection is tested by is, not ==.
| nan = float('nan')
| nan2 = float('nan')
| nan2 is nan
| False
This argues otherwise, and for use of math.isnan() instead.
I expect you were making the point that another
Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com writes:
In this case, profile_id is None when the loop breaks. It would be
much more straightforward (and more Pythonic, IMO), to write:
client = StrictRedis()
while client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id:
print profile_id
That is pretty
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com writes:
In this case, profile_id is None when the loop breaks. It would be
much more straightforward (and more Pythonic, IMO), to write:
client = StrictRedis()
while
On 10/25/2012 10:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:04:52 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
It is a consequence of the following, which some people (but not all)
believe is mandated by the IEEE standard.
nan = float('nan')
nan is nan
True
The IEEE 754 standard says nothing
On 10/25/2012 10:19 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 2012-10-26 03:04, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/25/2012 9:46 PM, mambokn...@gmail.com wrote:
a = [float('nan'), 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
a
[nan, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
a.index(float('nan'))
This is a second nan object, and it is not in
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it avoids
repeated reallocations and is at least as expressive as any alternative.
What I have now is a case where I'm assembling lines of text for driving
a
On 25-10-12 16:47, Charles Hixson wrote:
In Python3 is there any good way to count the number of on bits in an
integer (after an operation)?
Alternatively, is there any VERY light-weight implementation of a bit
set? I'd prefer to use integers, as I'm probably going to need
thousands of
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it avoids
repeated reallocations and is at least as expressive as any alternative.
What I have now is a case where I'm assembling
Am 26.10.2012 06:45, schrieb Rivka Miller:
Thanks everyone, esp this gentleman.
Who is this?
The solution that worked best for me is just to use a DOT before the
string as the one at the beginning of the line did not have any char
before it.
Which was what I suggested, and where you
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:49:50 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it avoids
repeated reallocations and is at least as expressive as any alternative.
What I have now
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:23:12 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
Why is everyone skirting around C-style assignment expressions as though
they're simultaneously anathema and the goal? :)
Only if your goal is to introduce an anathema :P
--
Steven
--
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:53:11 -0400, David Hutto
dwightdhu...@gmail.com wrote:
OTOH, Python web scripts can be written as long-running scripts: In
this case, what is the added-value of using FastCGI? Why can't the
web server simply call the Python script directly, just like CGI?
The server
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:24:16 +0100, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk
wrote:
But actually, I didn't mean one-shot scripts, where the Python
interpreter + script must be loaded each time, but rather: If I leave
a Python running in an endless loop, why not just use either CGI or
some other basic
Rivka Miller wrote:
I am looking for a regexp for a string not at the beginning of the
line.
For example, I want to find $hello$ that does not occur at the
beginning of the string, ie all $hello$ that exclude ^$hello$.
The begging of the string is zero width character. So you could use
Alex,
You can read wheezy.web introduction here:
http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/10/wheezy-web-introduction.html
Thanks.
Andriy Kornatskyy
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:26:16 -0700
Subject: Re: Fastest web framework
From: wuwe...@gmail.com
To:
On 26/10/2012 10:58, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:24:16 +0100, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk
wrote:
But actually, I didn't mean one-shot scripts, where the Python
interpreter + script must be loaded each time, but rather: If I leave
a Python running in an endless loop, why not just
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:00:17 +0100, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk
wrote:
Certainly there are Python equivalents (mod_python, mod_wsgi, etc.)
which can run in effectively the same way as mod_php, and they could be
configured to run an fcgi frontend script, I presume. There's always a
certain
Rivka Miller rivkaumil...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks everyone, esp this gentleman.
Kind of you to single me out, but it was Janis Papanagnou who first
posted the solution that you say works best for you.
snip
--
Ben.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10/25/2012 11:45 PM, Rivka Miller wrote:
Thanks everyone, esp this gentleman.
The solution that worked best for me is just to use a DOT before the
string as the one at the beginning of the line did not have any char
before it.
That's fine but do you understand that that is not an RE that
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Ed Morton mortons...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 11:45 PM, Rivka Miller wrote:
Thanks everyone, esp this gentleman.
The solution that worked best for me is just to use a DOT before the
string as the one at the beginning of the line did not have any char
On 2012-10-25, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Neil Cerutti
ne...@norwich.edu wrote:
Yes indeed! Python string operations are fast enough and its
arithmetic slow enough that I no longer assume I can beat a
neat lexicographical solution. Try defeating
Yesterday I stumbled upon a nice solution to dealing with naive
datetimes vs. localized datetimes, and much of the tedium that issues
from that problem. Maybe this is very common knownledge but it wasn't
mentioned in anything I've read - it really cleans up some opertaions.
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:06:01 PM UTC-7, Paul Rubin wrote:
Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com writes:
In this case, profile_id is None when the loop breaks. It would be
much more straightforward (and more Pythonic, IMO), to write:
client = StrictRedis()
while
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 03:54:02 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/25/2012 10:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:04:52 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
It is a consequence of the following, which some people (but not all)
believe is mandated by the IEEE standard.
nan = float('nan')
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com wrote:
while client.spop(profile_ids) as truthy, profile_id:
if not truthy:
break
print profile_id
Here, client.spop returns a tuple, which will always returns true. We then
extract the
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:56:25 AM UTC-7, Charles Hixson wrote:
In Python3 is there any good way to count the number of on bits in an
integer (after an operation)?
You may want to look at gmpy2[1] and the popcount() function.
Alternatively, is there any VERY light-weight
Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com writes:
We also don't special case things like this just because x is an empty
string. If this while EXPR as VAR thing were to move forward, we
shouldn't treat the truth testing any differently than how we already
do. IMO we should write our applications
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:00:03 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/25/2012 10:19 PM, MRAB wrote:
In summary, .index() looks for an item which is equal to its argument,
but it's a feature of NaN (as defined by the standard) that it doesn't
equal NaN, therefore .index() will never find it.
Except
Hi Ulrich,
is this acceptable?
args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
args.append('\n')
line = ' '.join(args)
Cheers,
Hubert
On 10/26/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's
cas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:56:25 AM UTC-7, Charles Hixson wrote:
In Python3 is there any good way to count the number of on bits in an
integer (after an operation)?
You may want to look at gmpy2[1] and the popcount() function.
Alternatively, is there any VERY
On 2012-10-26 17:23, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:00:03 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/25/2012 10:19 PM, MRAB wrote:
In summary, .index() looks for an item which is equal to its argument,
but it's a feature of NaN (as defined by the standard) that it doesn't
equal NaN,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
In real life, you are *much* more likely to run into these examples of
insanity of floats than to be troubled by NANs:
- associativity of addition is lost
- distributivity of multiplication is lost
-
I have been doing the following to keep my class declarations short:
class MyClass(MyOtherClass):
def __init__(self,*args,**kwargs):
self.MyAttr = kwargs.get('Attribute',None) #To get a default
MyOtherClass.__init__(self,*args,**kwargs)
Is there a recommended way to get
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jeff Jeffries
jeff.jeffries@gmail.com wrote:
I have been doing the following to keep my class declarations short:
class MyClass(MyOtherClass):
def __init__(self,*args,**kwargs):
self.MyAttr = kwargs.get('Attribute',None) #To get a default
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 03:45:46 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
In real life, you are *much* more likely to run into these examples of
insanity of floats than to be troubled by NANs:
- associativity of
On 10/26/2012 11:26 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 03:54:02 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/25/2012 10:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:04:52 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
It is a consequence of the following, which some people (but not all)
believe is
Hi,
I've just uploaded pypiserver 1.0.0 to the python package index.
pypiserver is a minimal PyPI compatible server. It can be used to serve
a set of packages and eggs to easy_install or pip.
pypiserver is easy to install (i.e. just 'pip install pypiserver'). It
doesn't have any external
On 10/26/2012 12:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:00:03 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
This inconsistency is an intentional decision to
not propagate the insanity of nan != nan to Python collections.
That's a value judgement about NANs which is not shared by everyone.
Quite
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
The problem isn't with the associativity, it's with the equality
comparison. Replace x == y with abs(x-y)epsilon for some epsilon
and all your statements fulfill people's expectations.
O RYLY?
Would
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:49:50AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it
avoids repeated reallocations and is at least as expressive as any
alternative.
What I
On 10/26/2012 05:26 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:49:50AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Hi!
General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them
repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it
avoids repeated reallocations and is at least
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
On 10/26/2012 05:26 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
Assuming it's the length of the list that's the problem, not the
length of the strings in the list...
args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
args[-1] = args[-1] + '\n'
line = ' '.join(args)
Error is like cannot set special baud rate.
But as I said pyserial set this speed without problem for ttyUSB0
So it seems pyserial uses diefferent code depending of port type.
I tried to simlink ln -s ttyACM0 ttyUSB0 but it does not work
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:11:23 PM UTC+3, Dennis
On 26Oct2012 09:10, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
| However, if the as can be part of an expression as in Chris Angelico's
| post, Chris's suggestion
|
| while (client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id) is not None:
| print profile_id
|
| looks good to me.
Now this pulls
On 10/26/2012 04:01 PM, kura...@gmail.com wrote:
Error is like cannot set special baud rate. But as I said pyserial
set this speed without problem for ttyUSB0 So it seems pyserial uses
diefferent code depending of port type. I tried to simlink ln -s
ttyACM0 ttyUSB0 but it does not work
No
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
It will work anywhere an expression is allowed, and superficially
doesn't break stuff that exists if as has the lowest precedence.
Please, no. There is no need for it outside of while expressions, and
anywhere else it's
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the topic of this thread has changed drastically from the original
message.
1) while EXPR as VAR in no way says that EXPR must be a boolean value. In
fact, a use case I've run into commonly in web
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
while (client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id) is not None:
print profile_id
Why is everyone skirting around C-style assignment expressions as
though they're simultaneously anathema and the goal? :)
Why should these
On 10/26/12 17:03, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 26Oct2012 09:10, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
| while (client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id) is not None:
Now this pulls me from a -0 to a +0.5.
Any doco would need to make it clear that no order of operation is
implied, so
On 10/25/2012 12:47 PM, Kamlesh Mutha wrote:
You can use paramiko module. Very easy to use.
I also use paramiko for a small script.
However I'm a little hesitant to use paramik for new code.
The web page says: last updated 21-May-2011
and the github url http://github.com/robey/paramiko/
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.comwrote:
For loops are pythonic. You can do this in Python today:
client = StrictRedis()
for profile_id in iter(lambda: client.spop(profile_ids), None):
pass
I would like a better iter(), rather than a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
Any doco would need to make it clear that no order of operation is
implied, so that this:
x = 1
y = (2 as x) + x
does not have a defined answer; might be 2, might be 3. Just like any
other function call with side
On 26Oct2012 19:41, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
| Any doco would need to make it clear that no order of operation is
| implied, so that this:
|
|x = 1
|y = (2 as x) + x
|
| does not have a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com wrote:
-- snip insanity --
But this is yucky. I'd much rather have something a bit more clear to the
reader.
That's why I said I wanted a better iter, not some equality-overriding
object strawman thing.
I was thinking more
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
No. Separate _expressions_ are evaluated left to right.
So this:
f(1), f(2)
calls f(1) first, then f(2). But this:
f(1) + f(2)
need not do so. Counter-documentation welcomed, but the doco you cite
does not
On 26Oct2012 18:26, Tim Chase s...@thechases.com wrote:
| On 10/26/12 17:03, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| On 26Oct2012 09:10, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
| | while (client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id) is not None:
|
| Now this pulls me from a -0 to a +0.5.
|
| Any doco
On 27Oct2012 10:56, I wrote:
| On 26Oct2012 19:41, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
| | But function calls with side effects _do_ have a defined order of
| | evaluation. Left to right.
| | And the answer should be 4.
| |
On 26Oct2012 16:48, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
| It will work anywhere an expression is allowed, and superficially
| doesn't break stuff that exists if as has the lowest precedence.
|
| Please, no. There is
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:12:17 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
I would like a better iter(), rather than a better while loop. It is
irritating to pass in functions that take arguments, and it is
impossible to, say, pass in functions that should stop being iterated
over when they return _either_
On 26Oct2012 19:19, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
| (I've always been partial to :=, personally.)
I'm less so. It is hard to type (on my keyboard anyway, that's a shifted
keystroke followed by an unshifted one). I mank that up often enough
that I would resent it for something as
In article mailman.2915.1351294793.27098.python-l...@python.org,
Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
Another problem is, that paramiko depends on pycrypto 2.1+
which doesn't exist as binary release for python 2.7
I'm running paramiko-1.7.6 with python 2.7.3 on my Ubunto Precise box.
I'm
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I would like a better iter(), rather than a better while loop. It is
irritating to pass in functions that take arguments, and it is
impossible to, say, pass in functions that should stop being iterated
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
while (client.spop(profile_ids) as profile_id) is not None:
print profile_id
Why is everyone skirting around C-style assignment
Hi,
I'm new to python and I'm trying to porting some scripts from v0.96 to
v2.0.1. A piece of code is like this:
cmd_h = os.popen4(env['SYSCMDLINE'])[1]
the system indicates the popen4 is deprecated and suggest to use
subprocess. Can anybody tell me how to use subprocess in this case?
and what
I have been reading the thread while expression feature proposal,
and one of the interesting outcomes of the thread is the idea that
Python could allow you to attach names to subexpressions, much like C
allows. In C you can say something like this:
tax_next_year = (new_salary = salary * (1 +
On 2012-10-27 03:28, skyworld wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to python and I'm trying to porting some scripts from v0.96 to
v2.0.1. A piece of code is like this:
cmd_h = os.popen4(env['SYSCMDLINE'])[1]
the system indicates the popen4 is deprecated and suggest to use
subprocess. Can anybody tell me how to
On 27/10/2012 03:28, skyworld wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to python and I'm trying to porting some scripts from v0.96 to
v2.0.1. A piece of code is like this:
What software are you talking about here, it's certainly not Python
versions as the most up to date are 2.7.3 and 3.3.0?
cmd_h =
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
There's no need for it *inside* of while expressions. It doesn't add to
the expressiveness of the language, or increase the power of the
language, or help people write correct code. It saves one trivial line of
code in some, but
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
No automated testing included because I'm not entirely sure how to replicate
this without eating up a ton of ram or doing something naughty with ulimit.
Simply use RLIMIT_NPROC, from a subprocess:
$ cat /tmp/test.py
import subprocess
ps = [ ]
for
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Here's a patch for 3.4. __qualname__ ought to have been implemented this way in
the first place. I'll have to think about what can be done about 3.3. Maybe
just the same fix without the removal of PyHeapType.ht_qualname. We can hope no
one has written
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I'm not sure why this would be the correct way to do it. First you are removing
the unicode check, which looks wrong to me. Second, if ht_name works, perhaps
ht_qualname can be made to work as well?
--
___
Python
Changes by Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com:
--
nosy: +cvrebert
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16285
___
___
Python-bugs-list
STINNER Victor added the comment:
sys.getfilesystemencoding()
'mbcs'
import locale
locale.getpreferredencoding()
'cp932'
'cp932' is the same as 'mbcs' in the Japanese environment.
And what is the value.of locale.getpreferredencoding(False)?
--
Changes by Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com:
--
nosy: +cvrebert
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16309
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
Also, I didn't check, but if the problems also occurs on execve()
failure, then it's much simpler: simply call Popen() with an
invalid/nonexisting executable.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
This whole refactoring project grew out of the fact that Chris and I were
looking for somewhere to put common helpers for package testing. Specfically, I
wrote a heap of helpers for test_runpy that I wanted to use for the new pkgutil
tests.
The short term hack
Masami HIRATA added the comment:
And what is the value.of locale.getpreferredencoding(False)?
import locale
locale.getpreferredencoding(False)
'cp932'
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16322
Ronald Oussoren added the comment:
Apple seems to have switched to using dlopen in their version of getpath.c (see
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/python/python-60.3/2.7/fix/getpath.c.ed,
this is the version in OSX 10.8.2)
This causes a problem for some people, as noticed on the
Hynek Schlawack added the comment:
Isn’t this a dupe of #5411?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16313
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Yes, this is actually a dupe of #5411? Thanks.
--
resolution: - duplicate
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
superseder: - Add xz support to shutil
___
Python tracker
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: -berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9856
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
I have not seen this issue and was created a new issue16313 with almost same
patch as Eric's one (only I have changed the documentation too). Here's the
patch. I wonder that it was not committed yet to 3.3. I think it would be
better first to add xz support
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5411
___
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: -berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11468
___
___
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment:
The problem with using RLIMIT is that the testsuite could be executing several
tests in parallel using independent threads, for instance. You don't want to
influence unrelated tests.
Overiding private methods is ugly, but if the code evolves the test would
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file27722/shutil-lzma.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5411
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Oh, I see the '.bz2' bug. Patch updated.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27723/shutil-lzma_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5411
Hynek Schlawack added the comment:
Thanks for taking the time! I remember my frustrations when trying to grok how
the mp test suite works. :)
A small nit-pick first: you have a lot of extra white space in your patches.
Just run 'make patchcheck' first, that should warn you about that.
Not
lilydjwg added the comment:
My system has updated to Python 3.3.0 and this bugs me again :-(
I don't see the changes in Python 3.3.0. So when will this be merged into 3.3?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15222
Petri Lehtinen added the comment:
The fix was committed when 3.3.0 was in release candidate mode, and wasn't
considered important enough to be included in 3.3.0 anymore. It will be
included in 3.3.1, which is to be released next month.
--
___
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
The problem with using RLIMIT is that the testsuite could be executing
several tests in parallel using independent threads, for instance. You don't
want to influence unrelated tests.
That's why I suggested to run it in a subprocess: this is used
Janne Karila added the comment:
Otherwise I agree, but what if one of the callbacks is not called? The test
case would fail on assertEqual(2, len(call_args)) but you wouldn't know which
callback is the problem.
--
___
Python tracker
Winston451 added the comment:
I attached a patch that solve the problem
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27725/readline.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4202
Changes by Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27726/issue16324-1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16324
___
Changes by Winston451 montag...@laposte.net:
--
type: - behavior
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python
3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4202
Changes by Winston451 montag...@laposte.net:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27727/readline.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4202
___
Changes by Winston451 montag...@laposte.net:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file27725/readline.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4202
___
New submission from Emil Styrke:
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Python version: 2.7.3 x64
win_add2path.py in the scripts directory is supposed to add the Scripts
directory according to its source. However, it tries to add
$PYTHONPATH/Scripts, when in fact the Scripts directory is at
Hynek Schlawack added the comment:
True, it makes sense to push this assert to the end.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16307
___
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
