I've started a meetup for Python in the Louisville, KY area. Come check
us out:
http://www.meetup.com/derbypy/
*Randy Syring*
Husband | Father | Redeemed Sinner
/For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world
and forfeit his soul? (Mark 8:36 ESV)/
--
On 8/11/2014 1:15 AM, 13813962782 wrote:
Java is belonging to Oracle, C++ is defined by ISO; Python is designed
by great Guido van Rossum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_van_Rossum;
Python is owned, as in copyright and trademark, by the Python Software
Foundation, a US non-profit
On Monday, August 11, 2014 11:16:25 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
A C programmer asked to swap variables x and y, typically writes something
like
t = x; x = y; y = t;
Fine, since C cant do better.
But then he assumes that that
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I don't think that using a good, but not cryptographically-strong, random
number
Specifically for Python 2.6 and 2.7, but answers for 3.x appreciated as
well.
Is print thread safe? That is, if I have two threads that each call
print, say:
print spam spam spam # thread 1
print eggs eggs eggs # thread 2
I don't care which line prints first, but I do care if the two lines
On 11/08/2014 06:06, Paul Wolf wrote:
I'm pleased to see that you have answers. In return would you please
read and action this https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython to
prevent us seeing double line spacing and single line paragraphs, thanks.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:22:45 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
You think that the '=' sign not standing for math equality is ok.
How come?
For the same reason that in the following:
[c.upper() for c in some_string if 'a' c 'x']
having the c symbol not stand for the speed of light is okay.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:15:19 +0800, 13813962782 wrote:
Just like MANY people, I was one of guys who do very like Python. But
there's one thing always puzzled me, could you kindly help give some
words about it:
Java is belonging to Oracle, C++ is defined by ISO Python is designed
by great
Thankfully, all actually user-friendly operating systems (MacOS,
TOS, RiscOS, probably AmigaOS, MacOS X) spare(d) their users the
bottomless cesspit of package management and/or installers.
Because on such operating systems, each and every application is
an entirely
Linux was made by geeks who didn't have a clue of ergonomics for
screenworkers and didn't care to get one.
I can only repeat what you said earlier:
You should get a clue in stead [sic] of just fantasizing up
assumptions based on ignorance.
I daresay that Linus Torvalds spends more
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:22:45 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
You think that the '=' sign not standing for math equality is ok.
How come?
For the same reason that in the following:
[c.upper() for c in some_string if 'a'
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:08:43 +0200, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
By the way, you keep replying to people, and quoting them, but deleting
their name. Please leave the attribution in place, so we know who you
are replying to.
That's what the References:-Header is there for.
Sincerely,
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com:
You think that the '=' sign not standing for math equality is ok.
How come?
Python is a formal language with a well-defined syntax and reasonably
well-understood semantics. That's all that matters. Any resemblance to
the much more ad-hoc syntax of classical
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:23:18 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
A C programmer asked to swap variables x and y, typically writes
something like
t = x; x = y; y = t;
Fine, since C cant do better.
But then he assumes that that much sequentialization is inherent to the
problem... Until he sees the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Python is a formal language with a well-defined syntax and reasonably
well-understood semantics. That's all that matters. Any resemblance to
the much more ad-hoc syntax of classical mathematics is almost
coincidental.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
And even when you can
parallelize a series of tasks, it's
... easy for one task to get aborted part way while the rest of the
tasks continue on, oblivious to the absence of the rest of that
sentence?
ChrisA
--
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I think this is why both declarative and functional programming idioms
will remain niche (although important niches). Most tasks are inherently
imperative to at least some degree, and often a *great* degree.
Maybe
On Python 3, print is thread safe.
But Python 2 has broken scenario:
print spam, spam, spam # thread 1
print eggs, eggs, eggs # thread 2
In this case, 2 lines are mixed.
In your case, spam spam spam and eggs eggs eggs are not mixed.
But newline is mixed like:
spam spam spameggs eggs eggs
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:37 PM, alister
alister.nospam.w...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:08:43 +0200, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
By the way, you keep replying to people, and quoting them, but deleting
their name. Please leave the attribution in place, so we know who you
are
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:29:12 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Monday, August 11, 2014 8:30:32 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You did the same thing in your own course, the only difference being
you accepted a different set of primitive functions. But ultimately you
have to introduce *some*
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Python is a formal language with a well-defined syntax and reasonably
well-understood semantics. That's all that matters. Any resemblance
to the much more ad-hoc syntax of classical
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
The main thing is that the definitions must be clear. I must be able to
look up the precise description quickly, and in fact, I always have the
Python Library Reference in a browser tab or two because I have to
review even
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info
wrote:
And even when you can
parallelize a series of tasks, it's
... easy for one task to get aborted part way while the rest of the
tasks continue on, oblivious to the absence of the rest of that
On Monday, August 11, 2014 3:58:59 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:29:12 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Monday, August 11, 2014 8:30:32 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You did the same thing in your own course, the only difference being
you accepted a different
On 2014-08-11 03:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Rustom Mody wrote:
Its when we have variables that are assigned in multiple places that
we start seeing mathematical abominations like
x = x+1
That's not a mathematical abomination. It's a perfectly reasonable
mathematical equation, one with no
In article b3c69a72-5f0c-4e2a-8ef0-91842e12c...@googlegroups.com,
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
A C programmer asked to swap variables x and y, typically writes something
like
t = x; x = y; y = t;
Fine, since C cant do better.
Sure C can do better.
x = x ^ y
y = y ^ x
x = x
Having it both ways aren't you?
On the one hand you say
On Monday, August 11, 2014 3:21:35 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Python is a formal language with a well-defined syntax and reasonably
well-understood semantics. That's all
On 2014-08-11 07:55, Roy Smith wrote:
A C programmer asked to swap variables x and y, typically writes
something like
t = x; x = y; y = t;
Fine, since C cant do better.
Sure C can do better.
x = x ^ y
y = y ^ x
x = x ^ y
Any self-respecting C hacker would write it this
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:56:59 +0100, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2014-08-11 03:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Rustom Mody wrote:
Its when we have variables that are assigned in multiple places that
we start seeing mathematical abominations like x = x+1
That's not a mathematical abomination. It's a
alister alister.nospam.w...@ntlworld.com:
It already is a different operator from equality which is ==
perhaps it would have been better if the behaviour of these two
operators were reversed (= for equality == for assignment) but i
suspect that Idea if even considered was quickly discarded
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
So evidently using notations in the ways they are conventionally used
is a good thing.
But then when it comes to Steven supporting the violation 500 years* of
math conventional usage of '=':
Yep. It's not a violation;
Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
Pish, such redundancy...everyone knows a C programmer would write
that as
x ^= y
y ^= x
x ^= y
Aren't you forgetting something?
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
Pish, such redundancy...everyone knows a C programmer would write
that as
x ^= y
y ^= x
x ^= y
Aren't you forgetting something?
I don't think he is. Those are augmented
On 11/08/2014 10:08, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
By the way, you keep replying to people, and quoting them, but
deleting their name. Please leave the attribution in place, so we
know who you are replying to.
That's what the References:-Header is there for.
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
The references
On 11/08/2014 10:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:15:19 +0800, 13813962782 wrote:
Just like MANY people, I was one of guys who do very like Python. But
there's one thing always puzzled me, could you kindly help give some
words about it:
Java is belonging to Oracle, C++ is
On 11/08/2014 13:30, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-08-11 07:55, Roy Smith wrote:
A C programmer asked to swap variables x and y, typically writes
something like
t = x; x = y; y = t;
Fine, since C cant do better.
Sure C can do better.
x = x ^ y
y = y ^ x
x = x ^ y
Any self-respecting C hacker
On 11/08/2014 13:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
But then when it comes to Steven supporting the violation 500 years* of
math conventional usage of '=':
I have no interest in the maths convention (see, you don't even know the
original, correct English, math indeed). Of far more importance in the
On 08/09/2014 09:07 PM, luofeiyu wrote:
in the http://homepages.ius.edu/rwisman/C490/html/PythonandBluetooth.htm
*Discovery*
That only works for phones if the phones are manually switched to
discoverable mode, which is off by default for security reasons. By
default they are not going to
On 11/08/2014 13:30, alister wrote:
It already is a different operator from equality which is ==
perhaps it would have been better if the behaviour of these two operators
were reversed (= for equality == for assignment) but i suspect that
Idea if even considered was quickly discarded as it
To me rather more interesting than discussing the relative merits of '='
compared to '==', '=' or ':='. See here
http://nuitka.net/posts/nuitka-release-054.html
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
INADA Naoki wrote:
On Python 3, print is thread safe.
But Python 2 has broken scenario:
Is this documented somewhere?
--
Steven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2014-08-06, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
Because on such operating systems, each and every application is an
entirely self-contained package that doesn't need any packages or
installers to use it.
For people who have never used such a system it's probably difficult
to see
On 2014-08-11, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
[somebody, but we don't know who, wrote]...
By the way, you keep replying to people, and quoting them, but
deleting their name. Please leave the attribution in place, so we
know who you are replying to.
That's what the
I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
find that Python isn't installed as part of a base system. It's
also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
install, but I'd still pretty surprised it's not there by default. I
guess I've spent too
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
find that Python isn't installed as part of a base system. It's
also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
install,
On 2014-08-11, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid
wrote:
I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
find that Python isn't installed as part of a base system. It's
also not included in the
(Cross-posted from
http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/2d9f7i/survey_of_python_object_systems/)
Hello, has anyone created a survey of Python Object Systems? The two I am aware
of are:
- elk https://github.com/frasertweedale/elk
- Traits http://code.enthought.com/projects/traits/
--
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, thequietcen...@gmail.com wrote:
has anyone created a survey of Python Object Systems?
For the uninitiated, can you back up a step and define what you mean
by an object system? The term seems kind of broad for Google (
number of hits for CLOS, etc), and Wikipedia
On Monday, August 11, 2014 4:37:29 PM UTC-4, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, thequietcen...@gmail.com wrote:
has anyone created a survey of Python Object Systems?
For the uninitiated, can you back up a step and define what you mean
by an object system?
I
Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, thequietcen...@gmail.com wrote:
has anyone created a survey of Python Object Systems?
For the uninitiated, can you back up a step and define what you mean
by an object system?
Elk and Traits implement a C++-style object model
On Monday, August 11, 2014 5:09:35 PM UTC-4, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Elk and Traits implement a C++-style object model on top of Python. The
systems enforce member access, type constraints etc and result in ugly
code that barely looks like Python.
I personally get tired of manually
In article lsb84u$21c$1...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
Apparently. Perhaps theres an enable LSB compliance option
somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
Also beware that, unlike most other distributions and contrary to
recommended
On 11/08/2014 22:26, thequietcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 11, 2014 5:09:35 PM UTC-4, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Elk and Traits implement a C++-style object model on top of Python. The
systems enforce member access, type constraints etc and result in ugly
code that barely looks like
thequietcen...@gmail.com:
I personally get tired of manually assigning attributes in a
__init__() method.
It's not all that bad. Just do it.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/08/2014 13:30, alister wrote:
It already is a different operator from equality which is ==
Mathematicians use '=' for name binding all the time, with and without
'let':
Let u = x + y, v = x - y. Then ... .
However, name binding itself is a mental operation, not a mathematical one.
On 2014-08-07, Jaydeep Patil patil.jay2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have one query. I have did some programming which copies and paste
data using system clipboard. I need to keep one GUI always on top
till my python code is running.
If you mean keep it on top while it is running, the answer is
On 2014-08-08, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Steven D'Aprano
Why should that disable access to everything else? Most full screen
games let you alt-tab away from them (preferably auto-pausing the
game). If a game goes system modal on me, I would not be
On 12Aug2014 02:07, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
wrote:
INADA Naoki wrote:
On Python 3, print is thread safe.
But Python 2 has broken scenario:
Is this documented somewhere?
In python/2.7.6/reference/simple_stmts.html#index-22, print is described in
terms of a
On 31/07/2014 10:11, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to convert ISO8601-compliant strings representing dates or
dates and times into datetime.datetime objects.
I tried using the strptime method, but the problem here is that I can
only specify one format argument, which can be used to parse
On 2014-08-10, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Christian Gollwitzer aurio...@gmx.de:
Am 10.08.14 11:39, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
Android phones don't mount as storage devices?
Oh well, that's Android crossed off my list.
Not any longer. They used to, but the support for mass storage
On 06/08/2014 20:05, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Joel Goldstick joel.goldst...@gmail.com wrote:
Among other features it lists this: Gaps in functionality: ISO-8601
parsing, timespans, humanization
What is humanization?
Skip
Presumably as in
On 14-08-11 04:26 PM, thequietcen...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Hello, has anyone created a survey of Python Object Systems? The two I am aware
of are:
- elk https://github.com/frasertweedale/elk
- Traits http://code.enthought.com/projects/traits/
Here's the ones from my talk at Pycon 2005
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com wrote:
Of course Python can be even more confusing so that for example
class NeverEqual(int):
... def __new__(cls,v):
... self = int.__new__(cls,v)
... return self
... def __eq__(self,other):
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article lsb84u$21c$1...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
Apparently. Perhaps theres an enable LSB compliance option
somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
Also beware that,
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 12Aug2014 02:07, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
wrote:
INADA Naoki wrote:
On Python 3, print is thread safe.
But Python 2 has broken scenario:
Is this documented somewhere?
In python/2.7.6/reference/simple_stmts.html#index-22, print is
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
from __future__ import print_function
_print = print
_rlock = threading.RLock()
def print(*args, **kwargs):
with _rlock:
_print(*args, **kwargs)
You're conflating print and stdout here.
Wolfgang Keller wrote:
By the way, you keep replying to people, and quoting them, but
deleting their name. Please leave the attribution in place, so we
know who you are replying to.
That's what the References:-Header is there for.
The References header is for the benefit of news and mail
On 2014-08-12 10:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
It is rude to deliberately refuse to give attributes
While I find this true for first-level attribution, I feel far less
obligation to attribute additional levels (and the verbosity they
entail). If the reader is really that interested in who said
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:27:25 -0500, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-08-12 10:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
It is rude to deliberately refuse to give attributes
While I find this true for first-level attribution, I feel far less
obligation to attribute additional levels (and the verbosity they
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I cannot disagree with that. I consider that the first-level attribution
MUST be given, second-level SHOULD be given, and third- and subsequent
levels MAY be given, where MUST/SHOULD/MAY have their conventional
On 2014-08-12 02:07, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
It is rude to deliberately refuse to give attributes
While I find this true for first-level attribution, I feel far
less obligation to attribute additional levels (and the verbosity
they entail).
I cannot disagree with that. I consider
On 2014-08-11, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article lsb84u$21c$1...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
Apparently. Perhaps theres an enable LSB compliance option
somewhere in the Arch
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:23:57 AM UTC+5:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
find that Python isn't installed as part of a base system. It's
also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
install, but I'd
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info:
Personally, I believe that print ought to do its own locking. And
print is a statement, although in this case there's no need to support
anything older than 2.6, so something like this ought to work:
from __future__ import print_function
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Soonish.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21514
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Well, I hoped to get first some comments on the code itself (and especially the
test).
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19494
___
Changes by Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de:
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22181
___
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
stage: needs patch - commit review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21514
___
Akira Li added the comment:
tl;dr: added patch that clarifies Python re behavior. Please, review.
---
The documented behavior is not clear: why (a|ab)* is not equivalent to
(a|ab)(a|ab) for aba if the docs say as many repetitions as are
possible?
And it is not obvious (it is not the only
Changes by Akira Li 4kir4...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file36340/re-docs-repetitions.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19055
___
Changes by Akira Li 4kir4...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36341/re-docs-repetitions.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19055
___
Akira Li added the comment:
sphinx generates warning for the current docs introduced by this issue:
WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
I've uploaded a documentation patch that fixes it.
--
nosy: +akira
Added file:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
This is a patch with tests working for the tip of cpython.
--
hgrepos: +267
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36343/fix-issue19494-py35.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19494
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36344/fix-issue19494-py27.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19494
___
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Mercurial seems to be incredibly slow to clone, for anybody who is willing to
deal with git, my real repo is http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/cpython.git/
(branches basicAuth19494 and basicAuth19494_py3k).
--
___
Python
New submission from Claudiu Popa:
Hi. When os.rename fails inside distutils.file_util.move_file, the exception is
unpacked using ``(num, msg) = e``. While this was valid in Python 2, in Python
3 it should be ``e.args``. The attached patched fixes this.
--
components: Distutils
files:
Claudiu Popa added the comment:
Mm, it seems there's another instance of unpacking later on, when os.unlink
fails. Here's the updated patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36346/issue22182.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Demian Brecht added the comment:
Uploaded new patch. Removed support for RFC1808-specific behaviour. Extracted
non-compliant tests into comment blocks indicating the behaviour is no longer
supported.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36347/issue22118_2.patch
Mike Lissner added the comment:
Just hopping in here to say that the work going down here is beautiful. I've
filed a lot of bugs. This one's not particularly difficult, but damn, I
appreciate the speed and quality going into fixing it.
Glad to see the Python language is a happy place with
New submission from Patrick Westerhoff:
I’ve noticed that the methods in `datetime.timezone` all require a datetime
object (or explicitely `None`) as its parameter or they will raise an exception.
The datetime object however is never required for the implementation of the
method, so it seems
R. David Murray added the comment:
A timezone is a particular implementation of the general tzinfo API, and in the
general case the datetime argument *is* required. This is already documented
(ie: that timezone is a concrete implementation of tzinfo, and that the tzinfo
API requires the
Demian Brecht added the comment:
Thanks Mike, it's always nice to get positive feedback :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22118
___
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment:
As David explained, utcoffset() method signature is dictated by the base class.
This is not a bug.
--
resolution: - not a bug
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker
R. David Murray added the comment:
This patch looks like a feature addition rather than the discussed optimization
of always sending auth on the first request. As such it could only go into 3.5.
I'm also adding Nick Coghlan to nosy, for his opinion on whether or not this
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Fixed. Thanks for the patch, Akira.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7fcfb634ccca
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5411
Saimadhav Heblikar added the comment:
This patch does two things
1. Refactor pyshell-breakpoint-refactor.diff to reflect changes in
pyshell-breakpoint-refactor.diff
As in pyshell-breakpoint-refactor.diff, the set/clear(_here) breakpoint methods
are refactored into logical methods.
2. If the
Saimadhav Heblikar added the comment:
While working on issue22083, I noticed a few redundant comments. This patch
removes them.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36349/remove-pyshell-comment.diff
___
Python tracker
Matej Cepl added the comment:
This patch looks like a feature addition rather than the discussed
optimization of always sending auth on the first request. As such it could
only go into 3.5.
??? I was trying hard not to break current API, so I have created a new handler
to be on the safe
R. David Murray added the comment:
But that introduces a new element of the API, which is an API change. I
thought the plan was to change the existing code to always send the auth when
it was available. Why would that change the API? (Maybe it does...I haven't
looked into this issue in any
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
