I am pleased to announce release 2014.3 of SfePy.
Description
---
SfePy (simple finite elements in Python) is a software for solving systems of
coupled partial differential equations by the finite element method or by the
isogeometric analysis (preliminary support). It is distributed
What is PyDev?
---
PyDev is an open-source Python IDE on top of Eclipse for Python, Jython and
IronPython development.
It comes with goodies such as code completion, syntax highlighting, syntax
analysis, code analysis, refactor, debug, interactive console, etc.
Details
Dear all,
The latest release of TextTest includes
- Support for parallel testing using EC2 cloud
- Packaging and release process should now be smoother
- Now integrates with Git as well and bzr and hg.
- Performance data in HTML reports overhauled
and many other things besides.
Regards,
Geoff
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:33:06 PM UTC+3, Rob Gaddi wrote:
While you're at it, think
long and hard about that definition of fuzziness. If you can make it
closer to the concept of histogram
https://www.python.org/ seems to be down when I last checked on 06:45 UTC on
26th Sep 2014.
Anybody else experiencing this problem?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
2014-09-26 8:46 GMT+02:00 Gmane shivaji...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid:
https://www.python.org/
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/python.org
--
Miguel García Lafuente - Rock Neurotiko
Do it, the devil is in the details.
The quieter you are, the more you are able to hear.
Happy Coding.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Gmane
shivaji...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid wrote:
https://www.python.org/ seems to be down when I last checked on 06:45 UTC on
26th Sep 2014.
Anybody else experiencing this problem?
Working for me. Are you getting DNS failure, HTTP failure, SSL
certificate
Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Gmane
shivaji_tn at yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid wrote:
https://www.python.org/ seems to be down when I last checked on 06:45 UTC on
26th Sep 2014.
Anybody else experiencing this problem?
Working for me. Are you
2014-09-26 9:05 GMT+02:00 Gmane shivaji...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid:
Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com writes:
I am getting the following error in my Firefox browser (OpenSuse OS):
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection to www.python.org. The OCSP response
is not
I am working on a personal project that helps minecraft clients connect to
minecraft servers using tor hidden services. I am handling the client
connection in a separate thread, but when I try to join the threads they
hang. The problem is in the file called hiddencraft.py, in the function
main at
Working for me, In beijing is OK.
At 2014-09-26 14:46:15, Gmane shivaji...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid wrote:
https://www.python.org/ seems to be down when I last checked on 06:45 UTC on
26th Sep 2014.
Anybody else experiencing this problem?
--
Hi,
Thanks - that was the problemincorrect system date/time. The system
date time and hardware date time were off. Adjusted the system time to use
one of the online time servers and then used hwclock --systohc (as a root
user) to set the hardware clock.
But it is weird that the data from a
2014-09-26 9:25 GMT+02:00 Gmane shivaji...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid:
Hi,
Thanks - that was the problemincorrect system date/time. The system
date time and hardware date time were off. Adjusted the system time to use
one of the online time servers and then used hwclock --systohc (as a
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Rock Neurotiko
miguelglafue...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't fails the render of the data, fails the verification of the SSL
certificate, all certificates have an start and end date, if you are not in
that range, your browser don't verify it (that's to prevent
Hi,
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from
running Python code to learn whether it is implemented in Python or C
before calling into it ?
Thanks,
Wolfgang
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Wolfgang Maier schrieb am 26.09.2014 um 09:47:
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from
running Python code to learn whether it is implemented in Python or C
before calling into it ?
Not really. Both can have very different types and very different
interfaces. There
Greetings,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:57:15 PM UTC+3, Ian wrote:
Then your result depends on the order of your input, which is usually
not a good thing.
As stated in previous reply - I'm OK with that.
Why would you need to determine the *number* of bins in advance? You
just need to
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Wolfgang Maier
wolfgang.ma...@biologie.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
Hi,
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from running
Python code to learn whether it is implemented in Python or C before calling
into it ?
I'm not sure you can say for
- Original Message -
From: Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
Cc: Python python-list@python.org
Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2014 1:55:51 AM
Subject: Re: Flask and Python 3
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Juan Christian
juan0christ...@gmail.com wrote:
when I say video tutorial, it's
On Friday, September 26, 2014 3:26:34 PM UTC+5:30, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Though I'm never using videos to learn, they probably can benefit some people.
Ask you this question : is there a major difference between videos and
presentations, if not how can we justify the money spent on
On 9/25/14 2:26 PM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Juan Christian
juan0christ...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing is, it’s text. I suppose I could use some text-to-speech
software to provide you with a video tutorial version of that.
No, you can't, if you think a
Chris Angelico schrieb am 26.09.2014 um 10:42:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from running
Python code to learn whether it is implemented in Python or C before calling
into it ?
I'm not sure you can say
Hi Folks,
I need to develop a CLI (PyCli or similar)on Linux.
To be more specific to develop Quagga(open source routing software) like
commands using python instead of C.
Need some good reference material for the same.
P.S google didn't help
Thank You!
Vij
--
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Christian Calderon
calderon.christian...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on a personal project that helps minecraft clients connect to
minecraft servers using tor hidden services. I am handling the client
connection in a separate thread, but when I try to join
On 09/26/2014 06:54 AM, vijna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need to develop a CLI (PyCli or similar)on Linux.
To be more specific to develop Quagga(open source routing software) like
commands using python instead of C.
Need some good reference material for the same.
P.S google didn't
On 09/26/2014 06:54 AM, vijna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need to develop a CLI (PyCli or similar)on Linux.
To be more specific to develop Quagga(open source routing software) like
commands using python instead of C.
Need some good reference material for the same.
P.S google didn't
- Original Message -
From: vijna...@gmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2014 2:54:48 PM
Subject: PyCli : Need some reference to good books or tutorials on pycli
Hi Folks,
I need to develop a CLI (PyCli or similar)on Linux.
To be more specific to
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Chris Angelico schrieb am 26.09.2014 um 10:42:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from running
Python code to learn whether it is
On 09/23/2014 09:32 AM, Rob Gaddi wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Miki Tebeka wrote:
Before I start writing my own. Is there something like collections.Counter (fore
frequencies) that does fuzzy matching?
Meaning x is considered equal to y if abs(x - y) epsilon. (x, y and my
Hi,
I did this myself for the eric IDE. Depending upon your needs it is really
simple.
Just check the eric5.py main script. (http://eric-ide.python-projects.org)
Detlev
On Thursday 25 September 2014, 04:15:53 Timothy W. Grove wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good automatic crash reporting
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014, at 00:57, Miki Tebeka wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:37:10 PM UTC+3, Peter Otten wrote:
x eq y
y eq z
not (x eq z)
where eq is the test given above -- should x, y, and z land in the same bin?
Yeah, I know the counting depends on the order of items. But
On 9/26/2014 7:41 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Can't we just stick to trying to help people with Python, and let them
make other decisions for themselves?
I agree. The OP should watch the video on debugging, and the off-topic
discussion of video versus text should end.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:33:06 PM UTC+3, Rob Gaddi wrote:
While you're at it, think
long and hard about that definition of fuzziness. If you can make it
closer to the concept of histogram bins
On 9/26/2014 12:10 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
is there any reliable and inexpensive way to inspect a callable from running
Python code to learn whether it is implemented
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014, at 14:30, Rob Gaddi wrote:
The histogram bin solution that everyone keeps trying to steer you
towards is almost certainly what you really want. Epsilon is your
resolution. You cannot resolve any information below your resolution
limit. Yes, 1.49 and 1.51 wind up in
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:10:43 -0400
random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014, at 14:30, Rob Gaddi wrote:
The histogram bin solution that everyone keeps trying to steer you
towards is almost certainly what you really want. Epsilon is your
resolution. You cannot resolve any
I thought that Windows users who don't follow Python-dev might be
interested in this announcement
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136499.html,
the rest of you can look away now :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can
I am taking An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python at
coursera.org. From their announcments page:
Week one of the video contest is open
For those of you that are interested in helping your peers, the
student video tutorial competition is an excellent opportunity. The
week one
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:55:54 -0400, Seymore4Head
Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid wrote:
I am taking An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python at
coursera.org. From their announcments page:
Week one of the video contest is open
For those of you that are interested in helping your peers,
I'm at a bit of a loss trying to figure out where this mysterious
core module is. FWIW, this is a hosted server where python is
2.4, but 2.6 is available if named. Full steps were as follows:
1) Pull down get-pip.py as directed
wget https://raw.github.com/pypa/pip/master/contrib/get-pip.py
2)
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk Wrote in message:
I thought that Windows users who don't follow Python-dev might be
interested in this announcement
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136499.html,
the rest of you can look away now :)
--
My fellow
On 09/26/2014 06:30 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
Not Found
Worked fine for me.
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Still practicing. Since this is listed as a Pseudocode, I assume this
is a good way to explain something. That means I can also assume my
logic is fading with age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year#Algorithm
Me trying to look at the algorithm, it would lead me to try something
like:
if
On Friday 26 September 2014 23:49:43 Seymore4Head did opine
And Gene did reply:
Still practicing. Since this is listed as a Pseudocode, I assume this
is a good way to explain something. That means I can also assume my
logic is fading with age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year#Algorithm
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Not Found
The requested URL /pipermail/python-dev/2014-Sep
tember/136499.html, was not found on this server.
Someone forgot to be careful of posting URLs with punctuation near them...
Trim off the comma and it'll work:
Senthil Kumaran added the comment:
Sorry that I did not get involved earlier.
It is difficult to prove any problem with the current behavior and it is
rightly closed. The issue which was originally raised seems to me a cosmetic
one, which won't get exhibited as well.
Here is simple test
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here are most popular idioms which deserve special assertion methods:
assertHasAttr(obj, name) == assertTrue(hasattr(obj, name))
assertIsSubclass(type, expected) == assertTrue(issubclass(type, expected))
assertTypeIs(obj, expected) == assertIs(type(obj),
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Rather like this:
for n in os.listdir(dirpath):
p = os.path.join(dirpath, n)
if os.path.isdir(p):
shutil.rmtree(p)
else:
os.unlink(p)
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
Changes by paul j3 ajipa...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36728/sample3.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22401
___
___
Changes by paul j3 ajipa...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file36656/sample3.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22401
___
New submission from Stefan Behnel:
The attached patch adds fast paths for PyLong division by 1 and -1, as well as
dividing 0 by something. This was found helpful for fractions normalisation, as
the GCD that is divided by can often be |1|, but firing up the whole division
machinery for this
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I tried it, but it seems better to open a new ticket for this as there are
behavioural changes. See #22501.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22464
Claudiu Popa added the comment:
The patch looks good. Could you add a test?
--
nosy: +Claudiu.Popa
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22143
___
Changes by Claudiu Popa pcmantic...@gmail.com:
--
stage: patch review - test needed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16512
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Please do not use is for number comparison. This can be broken unexpectedly
in future or on alternative implementation.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22464
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Perhaps it would be worth to special case multiplying on 0, 1 and -1 and adding
0, 1 and -1 too.
--
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Any optimization requires a benchmark. What is the speedup?
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I proposed an optimization for x 0 (as part of a larger patch to optimize
2 ** x) but the issue was rejected:
http://bugs.python.org/issue21420#msg217802
Mark Dickson wrote (msg217863):
There are many, many tiny optimisations we *could* be making in
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Attaching a similar patch for long_mul().
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36730/mul_by_1_fast_path.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Any optimization requires a benchmark. What is the speedup?
I gave numbers in ticket #22464.
Since many Fraction input values can already be normalised for some reason, the
following change shaves off almost 30% of the calls to
PyNumber_InPlaceFloorDivide()
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
@Serhiy: moving the fast path into l_divmod() has the disadvantage of making it
even more complex because we'd then also want to determine the modulus, but
only if requested, and it can be 1, 0 or -1, depending on the second value.
Sounds like a lot more if's.
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Combined patch for both mul and div that fixes the return value of
long_true_div(), as found by Serhiy, and removes the useless change in
long_divrem(), as found by Antoine. Thanks!
All test_long.py tests pass now.
--
Added file:
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
@Serhiy: please ignore my comment in msg227599. I'll submit a patch that moves
the specialisation to l_divmod().
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Thanks for the reviews, here's a new patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36732/mul_div_by_1_fast_path_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
Lorenz Quack added the comment:
Oops!
tests sound like a good Idea.
I realized my fix doesn't work.
I had not noticed this before because in my application I had already
implemented a workaround :/
The problem with catching the trailing parenthesis is that the group then does
not match the
Changes by Stefan Behnel sco...@users.sourceforge.net:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file36732/mul_div_by_1_fast_path_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
___
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Sorry, last patch version contained a use before type check bug.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36733/mul_div_by_1_fast_path_3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Here is an incremental patch that adds fast paths for adding and subtracting 0.
Question: the module calls long_long() in some places (e.g. long_abs()) and
thus forces the return type to be exactly a PyLong and not a subtype. My
changes use a plain
Chris E added the comment:
Whilst in most cases this would be correct, in this case it looks like the
original contributor took a subset of what the original author wrote and put it
into the python libraries.
Until relatively recently the ElementTree.py file included a stanza that
attempted
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Le 26/09/2014 12:57, Stefan Behnel a écrit :
Question: the module calls long_long() in some places (e.g.
long_abs()) and thus forces the return type to be exactly a PyLong and
not a subtype. My changes use a plain incref+return input value in
some places.
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I think PEP 442 makes this request obsolete: you can simply implement
tp_finalize() and incref the object naturally from there. Kristjan, what do you
think?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13611
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Stefan Behnel sco...@users.sourceforge.net:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36736/mul_div_by_1_fast_path_3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
___
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Ok, updating both patches.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36735/add_sub_0_fast_path_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +rbcollins
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22197
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 84313c61e60d by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4':
Issue #17462: Add a paragraph about advantages of argparse over optparse.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/84313c61e60d
New changeset 45e1c0029aff by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #17462:
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I reran the fractions benchmark over the final result and the overall gain
turned out to be, well, small. It's a clearly reproducible 2-3% faster. That's
not bad for the macro impact of a micro-optimisation, but it's not a clear
argument for throwing more code
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 4eb847e7ddde by Berker Peksag in branch '2.7':
Issue #17462: Add a paragraph about advantages of argparse over optparse.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4eb847e7ddde
--
___
Python tracker
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, Anastasia.
--
assignee: eric.araujo - berker.peksag
keywords: +easy
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19610
___
___
Stefan Krah added the comment:
I'm seeing the same, it could be an Ubuntu issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1348275
--
nosy: +skrah
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22327
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Here's an updated patch.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
stage: - patch review
type: behavior - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36737/issue16324_v2.diff
___
Python tracker
Stefan Krah added the comment:
Ok, here's my take on the situation:
1) As far as Python is concerned, shape[0] == 1 was already special-cased, so
people could not rely on canonical Fortran or C strides anyway.
2) Accessing an element via strides should be done using PyBuffer_GetPointer(),
R. David Murray added the comment:
The updated patch looks good to me. Go ahead and commit it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16324
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
rm -rf /dir
Isn't it shutil.rmtree()? Am I missing something?
rm -f /dir/*
So it should skip dotted files, or remove them?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19642
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Thanks, Serhiy. However, something is wrong with the implementation. The
benchmark runs into an infinite loop (it seems). And so do the previous
patches. Does it work for you?
--
___
Python tracker
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I compiled it with 30 bit digits, in case that's relevant. (It might be.)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22486
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
There is the verbose attribute of the test.support module.
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22197
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
It works to me (compiled with 15-bit digits). Cold you please add debugging
prints (before and after the call of math.gcd()) and find which operation is
looping (math.gcd() itself, and for what arguments, or some Python code)?
--
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
That only works for the CPython test suite (and it's not a public API).
FWIW I'm +1 on the idea, but I would have to see how it will get implemented in
a patch.
--
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22197
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Usages of test.support.verbose should be replaced by self.verbosity.
As for output buffering, may be replace sys.stdout by file-like object which
flushes its buffered content to original stdout on failure and discard it on
success. Or add the self.log
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
As for output buffering, may be replace sys.stdout by file-like object
which flushes its buffered content to original stdout on failure and
discard it on success.
This is what the --buffer option is already supposed to do (I only found out
about it thanks to
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Oh, such small gain and only on one specific benchmark not included still in
standard benchmark suite, looks discourage. May be other benchmarks have gain
from these changes?
--
___
Python tracker
STINNER Victor added the comment:
2-3% faster
3% is not enough to justify the change.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22501
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Indeed, I'm sorry for suggesting two features in one issue :-)
Feature #1 is self.verbosity (as a read-only variable) on test cases. Sounds
like a no-brainer, IMHO :-)
Feature #2 is selective enabling of the buffering feature in test cases. This
rather
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
This is what hangs for me:
math.gcd(1216342683557601535506311712, 436522681849110124616458784)
a and b keep switching between both values, but otherwise, the loop just
keeps running.
The old fractions.gcd() gives 32 for them.
--
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I can confirm that it works with 15 bit digits.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22486
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 7230978647a8 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default':
os: Include posix functions in os.__all__. Closes issue #18554.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7230978647a8
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
Thanks for the patch.
I've committed this to 3.5 only, as there is a slight chance that it breaks
backwards compatibility for some scripts.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
