On 07/05/2015 04:29 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
of the world, but that the state of the world does
influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
»datetime.datetime.now
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> of the world, but that the state of the world does
> influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
> »datetime.dat
On 2015-07-05 21:36, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
of the world, but that the state of the world does
influence the value (behaviour) of a call
On 7/5/2015 4:29 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
And this is the intention of my post: Maybe there is such
a term, and I just missed to learn it so far? So,
do you know a term for the phenomenon that can be found
in Python but not in mathematics and consists in the state
of the world influe
On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
> But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> of the world, but that the state of the world does
> influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
> »datetime.datetime.now()
On 2015-07-05 15:36, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
> > But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> > the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> > of the world, but that the state of the world does
> > influence the value (behaviour
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.5 release
team, I'm relieved to announce the availability of Python 3.5.0b3.
Python 3.5 has now entered "feature freeze". By default new features
may no longer be added to Python 3.5.
This is a preview release, and its use is
Terry Reedy wrote:
> I suggest you post your minimal example there. User interest in an
> issue being fixed and willingness to test patches can help motivate.
I've done it. Thank you for help.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
memilanuk wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 07:58 AM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
> > PIYUSH KUMAR wrote:
> >> I have never used linux in my life.. only windows based computing.. So I
> >> have problems in installing third party libraries in python.
> >
> > It depends. One question is if there's already a re
On 07/04/2015 07:58 AM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
PIYUSH KUMAR wrote:
I have never used linux in my life.. only windows based computing.. So I
have problems in installing third party libraries in python.
It depends. One question is if there's already a ready-for-use
package for the third par
Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:52:55 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>>Despite the title, this is not one of the usual "Why can't Python do
>>maths?" "bug" reports.
>>
>>Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? If so, please reply with the version
>>of Python and your op
11 matches
Mail list logo
