On 02/01/17 06:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Since they're unlikely to do that however,
Then again, I see that einstein1410 made a couple of rather aggressive
posts 11 hours ago that haven't made it to my email, so maybe he did
manage to get himself ba
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Since they're unlikely to do that however,
Then again, I see that einstein1410 made a couple of rather aggressive
posts 11 hours ago that haven't made it to my email, so maybe he did
manage to get himself banned.
--
https://mail.python.org/mail
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2016-12-31, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 2016 3:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> That's true.
>>
>> Please include quoted context in your replies. I have no idea who or what
>> you're responding to.
>
> I'd just like to thank everybody for replying
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 10:41:22 -0800, einstein1410 wrote:
> What contribution I had made especially valuable?
Ask your mommy what sarcasm means.
--
GNU/Linux user #557453
The cow died so I don't need your bull!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
\> 3.6 added syntax for 'local flags'.
> '''
> (?imsx-imsx:...)
>
> (Zero or more letters from the set 'i', 'm', 's', 'x', optionally
> followed by '-' followed by one or more letters from the same set.) The
> letters set or removes the corres
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote, on Sunday, January 01, 2017 6:07 PM
>
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:50:25 -0800, "Deborah Swanson"
> declaimed the following:
>
> >Maybe it would help if I give a couple rows of (made up)
> data to show
> >what I mean (first row is field titles):
> >
> >..Description
The re module defines several flags that affect the compilation of a
pattern string. For instance, re.I == re.IGNORECASE results in
case-insensitive matching.
But what if you want part of a pattern to be case sensitive and part
not? For instance, the IDLE colorizer needs to match keywords an
On 01/01/2017 14:32, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 7:51:12 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
drift, but I'm about four sheets to th
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:35:46 -0800, "Deborah Swanson"
declaimed the following:
if len(l1[v]) == 0 and len(l2[v]) != 0:
l1[v] = l2[v]
elif len(l2[v]) == 0 and len(l1[v]) != 0:
l2[v] = l1[v]
elif l1[v] != l2[v]:
ret += ", " + labels[v] + " diff" if
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-list
> [mailto:python-list-bounces+python=deborahswanson.net@python.o
> rg] On Behalf Of Jussi Piitulainen
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 11:45 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Cleaning up conditionals
> Importance: High
>
>
> Debo
Chris Angelico wrote on Saturday, December 31, 2016 9:39 PM
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Deborah Swanson
> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand what you did here, at least not
> well enough
> > to try it.
> >
> > What conditional can I do between the 2 rows of listings (the list
> > na
Steve D'Aprano wrote
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:25 PM
>
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 02:58 pm, Deborah Swanson wrote:
>
> >> It's possible to select either l1 or l2 using an
> expression, and then
> >> subscript that with [v]. However, this does not usually make for
> >> readable code, so
On 2016-12-31, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2016 3:12 AM, wrote:
>
> That's true.
>
> Please include quoted context in your replies. I have no idea who or what
> you're responding to.
I'd just like to thank everybody for replying to einstein1410's posts
so that those of us who have plonked post
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 7:51:12 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> > Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
> > drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
> drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
> I make it more than a step or two in playing around with these things
> a
Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
I make it more than a step or two in playing around with these things
and trying to get my head around them before it would all descend into a
cacaphony
Steve D'Aprano writes:
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 02:58 pm, Deborah Swanson wrote:
>
>>> It's possible to select either l1 or l2 using an expression,
>>> and then subscript that with [v]. However, this does not
>>> usually make for readable code, so I don't recommend it.
>>>
>>> (l1 if whatever else l2
17 matches
Mail list logo
