On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 11:06:30 PM UTC, P. timoriensis wrote:
> >> stop prohibition of comp.lang.python !
> >>
> >> it is childish to do this prohibition business !
> >>
> >> don't you have spam filters ?
> >
> > The prohibition part of the subject line is added by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> >
> Niles, if you want to claim wxjmfauth is right, you'll have to present
> some actual evidence. He's claimed for years that Python's Unicode
> support is buggy (as he does here), without ever demonstrating a bug.
> We've long ago tired of trying to reason with him.
>
> The tradeoffs of memory u
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:44 AM, wrote:
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 2:54:26 PM UTC, S. I. wrote:
>> https://practical-scheme.net/wiliki/wiliki.cgi?python
>>
>> no register, no nothing ! just edit.
>>
>> ✨🍰✨ python - a piece of cake ✨🍰✨
>>
>> just edit or enter acode.py entry with
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:11 AM, wrote:
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 9:35:06 PM UTC, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Chris Green wrote:
>> > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well... "break" does bypass the rest of the block, but it still
>> >> exits
>> >> v
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 2:54:26 PM UTC, S. I. wrote:
> https://practical-scheme.net/wiliki/wiliki.cgi?python
>
> no register, no nothing ! just edit.
>
> ✨🍰✨ python - a piece of cake ✨🍰✨
>
> just edit or enter acode.py entry with
>
> {{{
>
> print(" oh yes, 2018 ")
>
>
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 3:00:19 PM UTC, S. I. wrote:
> stop prohibition of comp.lang.python !
>
> it is childish to do this prohibition business !
>
> don't you have spam filters ?
The prohibition part of the subject line is added by Lawrence D'Oliveiro when
he posts on google groups as h
>> Well, a little implicitly. Pointing out Erlang superiority in a pythonic
>> newsgroup is, of course, heresy.
>
> Python is fourth in the latest TIOBE index, Erlang doesn't even make the top
> 20, so in what way is it superior?
>
> Python doesn't need Pinky and the Brain in its quest to take
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 9:28:01 PM UTC, Wu Xi wrote:
> > Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents oppression of people who want to
> > use the list, funded by PSF, for its purpose, discussion of Python.
>
> why are PSF funds privileged over anybody else's fund, which has zero
> privilege
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 10:21:15 PM UTC, P. timoriensis wrote:
> >>> Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents oppression of people who want
> >>> to use the list, funded by PSF, for its purpose, discussion of Python.
> >>
> >> why are PSF funds privileged over anybody else's fund, which ha
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 9:35:06 PM UTC, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> >>
> >> Well... "break" does bypass the rest of the block, but it still
> >> exits
> >> via the end of the block. I have a tendency to try
One can purchase the following Python books and videos published by Packt for
$15 at https://www.humblebundle.com/books/python-by-packt-book-bundle for about
the next two weeks.
Python Data Analysis Cookbook
Mastering Python, Second Edition
Learning Robotics using Python
Python Programming with
On 2018-01-01 21:27:00 +, Wu Xi wrote:
> > Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents oppression of people who
> > want to use the list, funded by PSF, for its purpose, discussion of
> > Python.
>
> why are PSF funds privileged over anybody else's fund, which has zero
> privilege?
Because the
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Wu Xi wrote:
>
>> Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents oppression of people who want to
>> use the list, funded by PSF, for its purpose, discussion of Python.
>
> why are PSF funds privileged over anybody else's fund, which has zero
> privilege?
If you want
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>>
>> Well... "break" does bypass the rest of the block, but it still exits
>> via the end of the block. I have a tendency to try for one "return" per
>> procedure (so I'm more likely to have an "if ...: break"
> Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents oppression of people who want to
> use the list, funded by PSF, for its purpose, discussion of Python.
why are PSF funds privileged over anybody else's fund, which has zero privilege?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/1/2018 1:28 PM, Wu Xi wrote:
on
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2018-January/subject.html#start
which feeds intocomp.lang.python,
a lot of messages are missing. Appearantly there is some oppression scheme
going on.
Blocking of spamming and trolling prevents o
On 1/1/18 1:49 PM, Niles Rogoff wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:42:58 -0800, breamoreboy wrote:
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 10:14:59 AM UTC, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
Le lundi 1 janvier 2018 08:35:53 UTC+1, Lawrence D’Oliveiro a écrit :
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 7:52:48 AM UTC+13, Paul Rub
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> Well... "break" does bypass the rest of the block, but it still exits
> via the end of the block. I have a tendency to try for one "return" per
> procedure (so I'm more likely to have an "if ...: break" then "if ...:
> return").
I have always tried to enforc
Sorry, delete string "n't". I mean that you would strcuture your code
with that architecture.
Hate that.
marxos
On 1/1/18, John Q Hacker wrote:
>>> I don’t use gotos in C code. Why should it be “harder” in a higher-level
>>> language?
>>
>> Good for you.
>>
>> Looking at 14 million lines of Li
>> I don’t use gotos in C code. Why should it be “harder” in a higher-level
>> language?
>
> Good for you.
>
> Looking at 14 million lines of Linux kernel sources, which are in C,
> over 100,000 of them use 'goto'. About one every 120 lines.
Most use of goto's implies a lack of understanding of th
So far I found the SWIG method quite good. But I really think that I
will try patching CFFI to use libclang natively.
Etienne
Le 2017-12-29 à 20:00, Etienne Robillard a écrit :
Hi all,
I would like to extend uWSGI by creating a CPython extension module
for the libuwsgi.so shared library inc
(Posting On Python-List Prohibited)
why ?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 12:53:03 PM UTC, Wu Xi wrote:
> breamoreboy:
> > On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:19:13 PM UTC, Wu Xi wrote:
> >> breamoreboy:
> >>> An interesting write up on something that is incorporated into Python 3.7
> >>> https://engineering.instagram.com/copy-on-write-friend
On 01/01/2018 15:06, From wrote:
(Posting On Python-List Prohibited)
why ?
Huh?
I'm posting to the usenet group comp.lang.python (an off-topic reply to
an off-topic remark, but it happens).
I've no idea what the prohibited part is about, if that's what you're
pos
On 2018-01-01 06:10, Terry Reedy wrote:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/neps/dropping-python2.7-proposal.rst
Numpy people currently plan to stop adding features to their 2.7 branch
after Dec 31, 2018 and stop adding bug fixes to the last version
supporting 2.7 a year later, Dec 31
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:42:58 -0800, breamoreboy wrote:
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 10:14:59 AM UTC, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Le lundi 1 janvier 2018 08:35:53 UTC+1, Lawrence D’Oliveiro a écrit :
>> > On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 7:52:48 AM UTC+13, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> > > I wonder if thing
>> (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)
>> why ?
> I'm posting to the usenet group comp.lang.python (an off-topic reply to an
> off-topic remark, but it happens).
> I've no idea what the prohibited part is about, if that's what you're posting
> about. But there have been dozens o
On 01/01/2018 14:54, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2017-12-30 11:07:56 -0500, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Yes. I don't know any language which enforces "pure" structured
programming. They all have some constructs (goto, break, return,
exceptions, ...) to leave a block early. I don't think that invali
On 2017-12-30 11:07:56 -0500, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:46:14 +0100, "Peter J. Holzer"
> declaimed the following:
>
> >I don't think this is correct. Structured programming is much older:
> >ALGOL 60 was already a block structured language and Dijkstra wrote
> >"goto consi
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer:
> it seems that the original poster's mail went missing
>
> leugenpresse means lying press btw
>
> weird
>
> i doubt the author wanted to prank us by announcing i did this and that.
>
> Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer,
> Mauritius
> abdurrahmaanjanhangeer.wordpress.com
>
> O
the short versions are not equivalent, proggy won't work with them
> def neighbours(point):
> x,y = point
>
> yield x + 1 , y
> yield x - 1 , y
> yield x , y + 1
> yield x , y - 1 #this is proof that life can emerge
> inside of computers and cellular automat
Anaconda is v3.6
very 2017'ish by now...
;-)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12/31/17 8:15 PM, Wu Xi wrote:
def neighbours(point):
x,y = point
yield x + 1 , y
yield x - 1 , y
yield x , y + 1
yield x , y - 1 #this is proof that life can emerge
inside of computers and cellular automatons,
yield x + 1 , y + 1
from tkinter import * ; from tkinter import messagebox
import asyncio , random
async def one_url(url):
""" This is a multi threaded tkinter demo where tasks run in the background
and aim to not freeze the tk GUI, py v3.7"""
sec = random.randint(1, 8)
await asyncio.sleep(sec )
breamore...@gmail.com:
> On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:19:13 PM UTC, Wu Xi wrote:
>> breamoreboy:
>>> An interesting write up on something that is incorporated into Python 3.7
>>> https://engineering.instagram.com/copy-on-write-friendly-python-garbage-collection-ad6ed5233ddf
>>
>> Appearantly,
On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:56:16 PM UTC, bartc wrote:
> On 31/12/2017 17:01, breamoreboy wrote:
>
> >Further I've never once in 17 years of using Python been tearing my hair out
> >over the lack of goto
>
> Neither have I over all the advanced features of Python I never use, and
> for do
On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:19:13 PM UTC, Wu Xi wrote:
> breamoreboy:
> > An interesting write up on something that is incorporated into Python 3.7
> > https://engineering.instagram.com/copy-on-write-friendly-python-garbage-collection-ad6ed5233ddf
>
> Appearantly, Erlang is the way to go, w
On 01/01/2018 00:40, MRAB wrote:
On 2017-12-31 23:21, bartc wrote:
[Block delimiting]
proc fn2(int a)=
...
end
(or possibly "inline f123=").
[snip]
OT: if "case ... esac" and "if ... fi", why not "proc ... corp"? :-)
(I don't think Algol-68 used corp otherwise it might have been copied
FYI: https://bugs.python.org/issue31558
INADA Naoki
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 12:39 AM, wrote:
> An interesting write up on something that is incorporated into Python 3.7
> https://engineering.instagram.com/copy-on-write-friendly-python-garbage-collection-ad6ed5233ddf
>
> --
> Kindest regards.
39 matches
Mail list logo
