On 2024-04-05 22:32, shannon makasale via Python-list wrote:
Hi there,
My name is Shannon. I installed Python 3.12 on my laptop a couple months ago,
but realised my school requires me to use 3.11.1.
I uninstalled 3.12 and installed 3.11.1.
Unfortunately, I am unable to run python now. It keeps
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:40 PM shannon makasale via Python-list <
python-list@python.org> wrote:
> Hi there,
> My name is Shannon. I installed Python 3.12 on my laptop a couple months
> ago, but realised my school requires me to use 3.11.1.
>
> I uninstalled 3.12 and installed 3.11.1.
>
> Unfortun
On 4/5/2024 5:32 PM, shannon makasale via Python-list wrote:
Hi there,
My name is Shannon. I installed Python 3.12 on my laptop a couple months ago,
but realised my school requires me to use 3.11.1.
I uninstalled 3.12 and installed 3.11.1.
Unfortunately, I am unable to run python now. It keeps
Hi there,
My name is Shannon. I installed Python 3.12 on my laptop a couple months ago,
but realised my school requires me to use 3.11.1.
I uninstalled 3.12 and installed 3.11.1.
Unfortunately, I am unable to run python now. It keeps asking to be modified,
repaired or uninstalled.
Do you have
Stefan Ram wrote:
Mark Bourne wrote or quoted:
I don't think there's a tuple being created. If you mean:
( word for word in list_ if word[ 0 ]== 'e' )
...that's not creating a tuple. It's a generator expression, which
generates the next value each time it's called for. If you only ever
avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
That is an excellent point, Mark. Some of the proposed variants to the
requested problem, including mine, do indeed find all instances only to return
the first. This can use additional time and space but when done, some of the
overhead is also gone. What I mean is
