letitblog.com/code/python/greasemonkey.py.txt
Web interface:
http://www.letitblog.com/greasemonkey-compiler/
Feel free to e-mail comments, bug fixes, etc.
Adrian Holovaty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.holovaty.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
* pt-br (Brazilian)
* ru (Russian)
* sr (Serbian)
* zh-cn (Simplified Chinese)
* sk (Slovak)
See the full documentation here:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/i18n/
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
--
http://mail.python.o
http://www.djangoproject.com/
http://www.djangoproject.com/download/
Enjoy!
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
http://www.djangoproject.com/
http://www.djangoproject.com/download/
Enjoy!
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
itely advertise
this page more, as it's a bit hidden at the moment on the Django wiki.
There are three Django jobs on that page now, and I know of at least
two others. See
http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2005/nov/27/weekinreview/ .
Hope this helps!
Adrian
--
Adrian Holova
can use Ajax
with Django, just as you can use it with *any* Web framework. That's
because Ajax is a browser-side technology (JavaScript), not a
server-side technology (Python). Django is just as capable of producing
JavaScript as it is of producing (X)HTML or whatever else.
Hope that clears t
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Adrian, what you describe here is *exactly* what I call "no Ajax
> support": you have to handle the whole thing manually, the framework
> doesn't provide anything by itself. Would you say the CGI module offers
> support for templating, data persistance and Ajax as well ?-)
dmin interface -- for free.
* Full internationalization (i18n) support.
* A super-cool community!
* An RSS/Atom-producing framework.
* Tons of other niceties, such as generic views (which abstract common
Web-development patterns), based on several years' worth of solving
Real Problems in the Real Wo
go 1.0.
I would never use TurboGears or Ruby on Rails over Django for any
performance-intensive Web app. In my opinion, both frameworks make some
poor design decisions regarding the importance of performance.
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | chicagocrime.org | djangoproject.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ray wrote:
> Does the comparison between dynamic and static language carry over to
> comparison between Django and Turbogear too? Is this what is meant by
> "Turbogear is much more flexible than Django"?
Nah, the difference is more than Django is a complete product whereas
TurboGears is a collecti
dd some WSGI code to
the standard library -- for instance, code that runs a development
server for a WSGI-compliant framework, etc. Perhaps wsgiref:
http://svn.eby-sarna.com/wsgiref/
Just my two cents,
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | chicagocrime.org | djangoproject.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
be quite happy to set that up. Just
let me know!
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | chicagocrime.org | djangoproject.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
at yesterday's
Chicago Python Users Group meeting and was surprised to see that, even
in a group of only 30 people, 5 or 6 people used Outlook Web Access
through their company. I hope somebody finds this useful.
http://www.holovaty.com/code/weboutlook/
Please send comments and improvements
13 matches
Mail list logo
