Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages

2008-12-10 Thread Chris Rathman
On Dec 10, 6:51 pm, Xah Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've now gather code solutions in ruby, python, C, Java, here: > > now lacking is perl, elisp, which i can do well in a condensed way. > It'd be interesting also to have javascript... and perhaps erlang, > OCaml/F#, Haskell too. Pay me $6

Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages

2008-12-03 Thread Chris Rathman
Xah Lee wrote: > Come flying $5 to my paypal account, and i'll give you real code, > amongest the programing tech geekers here for all to see. That's the problem with Mathematica - it's so expensive that you even have to pay for simple benchmark programs. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: proliferation of computer languages

2008-07-21 Thread Chris Rathman
I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay. But I did want to point out that Oz should not be considered part of the ML family. Aside from not being statically typed - a very central tenet to ML, Oz is much more part of the Logic family of languages (Mercury, Prolog, etc...). On Ju

Re: Xah's Edu Corner: Criticism vs Constructive Criticism

2006-04-29 Thread Chris Rathman
Good thing there's absolutely nothing happening in the world of functional programming... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list