On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:43:24 + (UTC), Philipp Pagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
How about csv in the standard library?
(Um: Believe it or not I'm _still_ using
python 1.5.7.
I have no idea if csv was part of
On 23 Feb 2007 11:51:57 GMT, nmp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:45:54 +, schreef nmp:
Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:11:26 -0600, schreef David C. Ullrich:
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
Hey, cool! I am just beginning with Python but I may already be able to
help you
On 23 Feb 2007 19:13:10 +0100, Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-02-23, David C Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
And/or does anyone see any problems with
the code below?
[...]
(Um: Believe it or not I'm _still_ using python 1.5.7. So
On 23 Feb 2007 07:31:35 -0800, John Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:11 pm, David C. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
I can make available the following which should be capable of running
on 1.5.2 -- unless they've suffered bitrot :-)
(a) a
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
And/or does anyone see any problems with
the code below?
What csvline does is straightforward: fields
is a list of strings. csvline(fields) returns
the strings concatenated into one string
separated by commas. Except that if a field
contains a comma or a
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:25:23 -0700, Erik Max Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Good example, because we know that EMF is not dumb. I've seen
the same algorithm many times - the best example is ...
Man, an error made _six years ago_ and people are still bringing it up
On Wed, 31 May 2006 23:05:14 +0200, Fredrik Lundh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Miller wrote:
DSU seems like a lot of trouble to go through in order to use an O(n
log n) sorting algorithm to do what can be done in O(N) with a few
lines of code. The core code of random.shuffle() shows how
On 30 May 2006 21:53:32 -0700, greenflame [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you all for all of your help. Also I got the shuffle function to
work. Do not worry I will be back soon with more shuffling! However, I
do not quite understand this DSU that you mention, although it looks
useful.
I didn't
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:17:11 +0200, Sybren Stuvel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C Ullrich enlightened us with:
I thought that the fact that you could use the same trick for
_shuffling_ a list was my idea, gonna make me rich and famous. I
guess I'm not the only one who thought of it. Anyway,
On 28 May 2006 01:07:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a TempFile class that stores the data in memory until
it gets larger than a specified threshold (as per PEP 42). Whilst
trying to implement it, I've come across some strange behaviour. Can
anyone explain this?
The test
On Fri, 05 May 2006 07:44:45 -0500, David C. Ullrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Just curious: How does pythonxx.dll determine things
like where to find the standard library? That's the
sort of thing I'd feared might cause confusion...
Ok, it was a stupid question, cuz right there in the
On Tue, 09 May 2006 05:35:47 -0500, David C. Ullrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:46:57 -0400, Ken Tilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
If you, um, look at the code you see that cells.a = 42 triggers
cells.__setattr__, which fires a's callback; the callback then
reaches
On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:46:57 -0400, Ken Tilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
On 08 May 2006 12:53:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas
F. Burdick) wrote:
Ken Tilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you do not want on-change handlers propagating data to other
slots, though
On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:36:00 -0400, Ken Tilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Your spreadsheet does not have slots ruled by functions, it has one slot
for a dictionary where you store names and values/formulas.
Go back to your example and arrange it so a and b are actual slots (data
members?
On Mon, 08 May 2006 08:05:38 -0500, David C. Ullrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
def acall(cell, value):
cell.owner.slots['b'].value = value + 1
Needing to say that sort of thing every time
you define a callback isn't very nice.
New and improved version:
PyCells.py
class Cell:
def
On 08 May 2006 12:53:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas
F. Burdick) wrote:
Ken Tilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you do not want on-change handlers propagating data to other
slots, though that is a sound albeit primitive way of improving
self-consistency of data in big apps. The
On Thu, 4 May 2006 13:19:46 -0400, Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[David C.Ullrich]
Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on one Windows
system? Windows 98, if it matters.
(I can
Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on one Windows
system? Windows 98, if it matters.
(I can handle the file associations with no problem.)
Thanks.
**
If anyone feels
On Thu, 4 May 2006 16:17:57 +0200, Fredrik Lundh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David C.Ullrich wrote:
Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on one Windows
system? Windows 98, if it matters.
(I
19 matches
Mail list logo
