in
the bioinformatic parts, I already know some python. I'll show my boss
the link, thanks!
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
will look more closely at what other advice you write, I must confess
I didn't actually do that because, as I mentioned, I no longer had any
interest in accessing the module and I was busy (and still am) with
another problem. Thanks John!
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
with an underscore if I get
the import sorted?
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
thank
you for your information nontheless.
HTH,
John
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2010-01-06 19:33, Fencer wrote:
Hello, I just started using suds to use web services. First I tried suds
with a very simple web service I had written and was running myself.
That worked fine. Then I tried to use the web services provided by KEGG:
http://soap.genome.jp/KEGG.wsdl
But I get
On 2010-01-06 20:02, Fencer wrote:
On 2010-01-06 19:33, Fencer wrote:
Hello, I just started using suds to use web services. First I tried suds
with a very simple web service I had written and was running myself.
That worked fine. Then I tried to use the web services provided by KEGG:
http
is
testing an already existing service)?
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
in Thunderbird.
I altered my code slightly to account for this:
mail_server = smtplib.SMTP_SSL()
mail_server.connect('mysmtpserver.at.work', 465)
Everything I left untouched. However, it doesn't work:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Users\fencer\workspace\Send Email\src\send_email.py, line
16
7stud wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for your reply. After consulting the sysadmins here I was able to
get it to work.
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Piet van Oostrum wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for your detailed reply!
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
(the one I'm writing here) because it
prints too much information. Does that mean a join is out of the question?
Thanks for any replies!
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
:Polemics
only the first topic is printed. If topics only contain a single topic I
get this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Users\fencer\workspace\Find Expert\src\find_expert.py, line
57, in module
print experts[1]
File C:\Users\fencer\workspace\Find Expert\src
solved. I guess I can't use a join to print the known experts as I
described in my first post.
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
errors encountered by the interpreter (if that is the right way to put
it) in order to keep the console window open so one has a chance to see
the error message?
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
To be a trifle more explicit, turn:
...
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
into:
...
if __name__ == '__main__':
try:
main()
except Exception, why:
print 'Failed:', why
import
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the output {'a': set(['xyz']), 'c': set(['xyz', 'baz']),
'b': set(['xyz']), 'd': set(['baz'])}, so it seems to work but I have a
feeling this is a crappy solution that's underusing Python. Please
enlighten me of a better way!
- Fencer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
18 matches
Mail list logo