Hi,
How can I implement something like C++'s conditional compile.
if VERBOSE_MODE: print debug information
else: do nothing
But I don't want this condition to be checked during runtime as it
will slow down the code.
Thanks in advance.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks to Michael and Nick, I can now cross-compile my Pyrex extensions
for bog-standard Python 2.5. As I stumbled around in the dark trying to
bump into a solution, I was bolstered by the belief that at least two
other people had found the light at the end of the tunnel.
I had been using a cruft
I have a lousy little Python extension, generated with the generous help
of Pyrex. In Linux, things are simple. I compile the extension, link it
against some C stuff, and *poof*! everything works.
My employer wants me to create a Windows version of my extension that
works with the vanilla Python
> > 2nd question:
> [snip]
> > if x>10 and y>10 and z>10 and summ(tritup(x,y,z)): print "OK"
>
> Others have already suggested you use the built-in sum() function.
>
> I'll suggest you don't need it at all, because it is redundant.
>
> If the sum is zero, either all three values are zero or at leas
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:15:23 -0700, Alex Martelli wrote:
> As suggested to me by David Rushby 10 hours ago,
>
> ... < huge URL snipped > ...
Alas, somehow this URL was split in two, and all the kings horses and all
the kings men can't seem to put it back together again (at least in my
browser).
You said:
> Sorry to post here about this again, but the hint forums are dead, and
> the hints that are already there are absolutely no help (mostly it's
> just people saying they are stuck, then responding to themselves saying
> the figured it out! not to mention that most of the hints require
> g
As long as you are optimizing, addition is slightly faster than
multiplication:
$ python2.4 -mtimeit 'h=1;h*=2'
100 loops, best of 3: 0.286 usec per loop
$ python2.4 -mtimeit 'h=1;h=h+h'
100 loops, best of 3: 0.23 usec per loop
Of course, that's only a 20% decrease, so it might not be wo
1. Try os.popen:
>>> import os
>>> os.popen('echo Hello World').read()
'Hello World\n'
2. Try a test environment built for testing shell commands, such as
DejaGnu:
http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Skipper wrote:
> I can not believe that there isn't a GUI programing tool that will
> allow me to build GUI apps - just like I use Dreamweaver to build a
> web page ... a WYSIWYG builder that does a few simplet things and
> calls other programs ...
>
> Oh well no silver bullet!
If you are int
ould be trivial modify the
Python code to do the same thing. Hope this is some help,
JW
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Every time, or just this run?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
It seems the concensus is that empty enums should be allowed for
consistancy, and to support the loop that doesn't. I thought I'd find
some data points in other languages as a guide:
* C - builtin, empty enumerations not allowed
* C++ - builtin, empty enumerations allowed. C++ doesn't have
itera
kslash:
print "\\library.zip"
If you don't use the double backslash, you'll eventually have a
problem, especially in Windows, which unfortunately uses the backslash
as a directory seperator. You might also want to look at os.sep and
the os.path.* functions, if you are interested in making your code work
on different platforms.
JW
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Here's my two cents -
I started with the official tutorial. It seemed up to date to me.
Things that changed from 2.4 to 2.5 changed in the tutorial as well. I
still refer to it every few days, because it had been a useful
reference for the basic data types. I like that it seemlessly links
into
I think of it this way: you randomly pick a entry out of a dictionary,
then roll a 100-side die to see if the pick is "good enough". Repeat
until you find one, or give up.
import random
def rand_weighted_pick(weighted_picks):
for i in range(100):
name, prob = random.choice(weighted_p
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:51:03 +, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> I, Jim Wilson, schreef:
>>
>> I'm assured that in print ads the only "content" anyone reads is in
>> picture captions, and you damn well better make sure your message is
>> conveyed there. Any other "content" only wastes space. I see no
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:33:06 -0800, Tim N. van der Leeuw wrote:
> What I especially dislike about the new website are the flashy pictures
> on the front-page with no content and no purpose -- purely boasting but
> nothing to back up your claims.
>
> (I wouldn't mind some sleek pictures there if t
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:19:37 +, Tim Parkin wrote:
> http://pyyaml.org/downloads/masterhtml/
>
> Feedback appreciated ... Many thanks
Again, with FF 1.0.7 (on FC4 Linux BTW), the left column no longer
violates the right. However, "View>Page Style>large text" makes the
button annotation small
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:00:05 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
> http://tim.thechases.com/pythonbeta/pythonbeta.html
>
Very strange. With FF 1.0.7, I can just get the buttons to violate the
next column if I "View>Page Style>Large Text", but I wouldn't have noticed
it unless Tim had pointed it out. Tim's
19 matches
Mail list logo
