On 13 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
> way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> something else to
On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much. Oh well,
>> guess coding is dead :(
>
> Pressing keys on a keyboard was never the hard part of
On 12 September 2013 13:00, Veritatem Ignotam
wrote:
> Is this thread going to evolve into your classic vim vs. emacs, sweet!
Who doesn't love those? ;-)
On 09/12/2013 11:47 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
>
> Joshua Landau writes:
>
>> If the time learning a set of tools is enough to make the choice
>>
On 2 September 2013 14:30, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Joe Junior wrote:
>> On 2 September 2013 14:00, Paul Rice wrote:
>>>
>>> I know that most of my time will be writing . I dont think i specified very
>>> well what im asking.
On 2 September 2013 14:00, Paul Rice wrote:
>
> I know that most of my time will be writing . I dont think i specified very
> well what im asking.
> What i mean by proper interface is a interface like for an app or something,
> let me give u an example;
> Say i have made a phonebook just for thi
On 29 August 2013 10:07, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Hmm. l don't know of any good articles off-hand. But what I'm talking
> about is simply developing the skill of reading exceptions, plus a few
> simple things like knowing where it's appropriate to catch-and-log;
> sometimes, what that means is actu
Well, the main reason for me asking this question here was because of
the Java/C#/Whatever developer in me craving for an Interface for the
container's items, and I noticed that I'm not alone in this. But I was
actually expecting the "We're all consenting adults, here", I guess I
just needed the co
While designing a simple library, I found myself asking a
philosophical question: to check or not to check the parameter's
interface?
I think that, considering it is Python, the usual answer would be
"no", but here is the situation that got me thinking:
class Flock:
def __init__(self):
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, BrJohan wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 16:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>> My classhierarchy is like a multilevel tree where each non-leaf node
>>> (class)
>>> is given knowledge about its nearest subclasses and their 'capacities'.
>>>
>>> So, my idea is to let the 'upper'