giacomo boffi writes:
> 2. choose ONE flavour of python, either 2.7.x or 3.4.x
> - future is with 3.4,
> - most exaples you'll find were written (are still written...)
> for 2.7.x
If you're interested in statistics (as comparisons to R suggest), I'd
recommend anaconda. It comes w
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> ryguy7272 :
>
>> I'm looking to start a team of developers, quants, and financial
>> experts, to setup and manage an auto-trading-money-making-machine
>
> This has already been done: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampo
And mocked by MST3K ("sampo means flavor!"):
https
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> blindanagram wrote:
>
>> Seccondly (as others here have pointed out), the mathematical properties
>> of the greatest common divisor are well defined for both positive and
>> negative integers.
>
> You keep saying that, but it simply is not true. Different people use
> di
Skip Montanaro writes:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> I'm probably conflating the 1.5.2/2.0 and the 2.6 stuff. I do
>> remember delaying moving from 1.5.2 -> 2.0 until I really had to, but
>> I don't remember why.
>
> If you were a RedHat user during that timefram
Rustom Mody writes:
> Ive been asked to formulate a python course for financial services
> folk.
>
> If I actually knew about the subject, I'd have fatter pockets!
> Anyway heres some thoughts. What I am missing out?
Good luck! It's a pretty broad field, so everyone probably has
different needs
Chris Angelico writes:
> But you also don't know that he hasn't. NaN doesn't mean "unknown", it
> means "Not a Number". You need a more sophisticated system that allows
> for uncertainty in your data.
Regardless of whether this is the right design, it's still an example of
use.
As to the design
"Anders J. Munch" <2...@jmunch.dk> writes:
> So far I received exactly the answer I was expecting. 0 examples of
> NaN!=NaN being beneficial.
> I wasn't asking for help, I was making a point. Whether that will
> lead to improvement of Python, well, I'm not too optimistic, but I
> feel the point w
Ben Last writes:
> Good points. I wanted to find a syntax that allows comments as well as
> being fluent:
> RE()
> .any_number_of.digits # Recall that any_number_of includes zero
> .followed_by.an_optional.dot.then.at_least_one.digit # The dot is
> specifically optional
> # but we must have one
David T. Ashley writes:
> We develop embedded software for 32-bit micros using Windows as the
> development platform.
...
> I know that Tcl/Tk would do all of the above, but what about Python?
> Any other alternatives?
Given that list, I'd say just use Tcl and be done. You could force the
squar
Miki Tebeka writes:
>>> I'm trying to find a way to have json emit float('NaN') as 'N/A'.
>> No. There is no way to represent NaN in JSON. It's simply not part of the
>> specification.
> I know that. I'm trying to emit the *string* 'N/A' for every NaN.
Easiest way is probably to transform your
Chris Angelico writes:
> Why is left-to-right inherently more logical than
> multiplication-before-addition? Why is it more logical than
> right-to-left? And why is changing people's expectations more logical
> than fulfilling them? Python uses the + and - symbols to mean addition
> and subtracti
Thomas Jollans writes:
> On 20/07/11 04:12, sturlamolden wrote:
>> 3. Unpythonic memory management: Python references to deleted C++
>> objects (PyQt). Manual dialog destruction (wxPython). Parent-child
>> ownership might be smart in C++, but in Python we have a garbage
>> collector.
>
> I wonder
12 matches
Mail list logo
