On Jun 9, 7:57 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Jun 9, 8:57 am, kretel wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > I am trying to implement the following functionality:
> > 1. log messages to the flash drive
> > 2. if the flash drive is not available, switch handler to the
> > BufferringHandler and log into buffer,
> > Anyway there's a TimedRotatingFileHandler handler in the logging package:
> > you can derive from it and change the emit/doRollover pair to hold the
> > records
> > until a device is not ready.
>
> Hm, that might be the way to go. Will have a try.
I had another look at the logging package.
Th
On Jun 9, 6:10 pm, "A. Cavallo" wrote:
> Hi,
> the problem screams for a separate thread.
I was thinking about that, as mentioned in the first post. Although, I
was wonder if there is another way to tackle the problem.
> Anyway there's a TimedRotatingFileHandler handler in the logging package:
On 12 Feb, 14:06, J Kenneth King wrote:
> I tend to work a lot with Trac for project management and have always
> found the browser interface to be a productivity killer. I always
> wanted a simple command-line interface to Trac, but having never found
> one I found a little free time and got off
On Feb 12, 12:54 am, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Richard,
>
> An excellent tool. Great job!!!
>
> Thank you for sharing this with the Python community.
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
Many thanks Richard and Josh.
I've just started my adventure with Python, and this document will
help me a lot.
Cheers,
K
Hi,
I am wrting a network packet processor. The processor listens on a
specific port for incomming UDP or TCP packets. When the packet
arrives it has to parse it, store in DB and if this succeed it has to
acknowledge the packet to the client. Now the problem is that I want
to have a control over p
On Feb 5, 11:51 pm, Lionel wrote:
> On Feb 5, 3:35 pm, Lionel wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 2:56 pm, Lionel wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 5, 2:48 pm, MRAB wrote:
>
> > > > Lionel wrote:
>
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I have data stored in binary files. Some of these files are
> > > > > huge...upwards of
On Nov 21, 6:55 pm, Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 11:05 am, Krzysztof Retel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 21, 4:48 pm, Peter Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:14:19 -0800
On Nov 21, 4:48 pm, Peter Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:14:19 -0800 (PST), Krzysztof Retel wrote:
> > I am not sure what do you mean by CPU-bound? How can I find out if I
> > run it on CPU-bound?
>
> CPU-bound is the state in which pe
On Nov 21, 5:49 am, Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 9:03 am, Krzysztof Retel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi guys,
>
> > I am struggling writing fast UDP server. It has to handle around 1
> > UDP packets per s
On Nov 21, 3:52 am, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Start the server before the client.
>
> If you want to try this program out on POSIX, make sure you change the
> time.clock() calls to time.time() calls instead, otherwise the results
> aren't very meaningful.
>
> I gave this a
On Nov 20, 4:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Nov, 16:03, Krzysztof Retel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi guys,
>
> > I am struggling writing fast UDP server. It has to handle around 1
> > UDP packets per second. I started building tha
On Nov 20, 3:34 pm, Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Krzysztof Retel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But the server only handles 700 -- 870 packets, when it is non-
> > blocking, and only 670 – 700 received with blocking sockets.
>
> What are your other t
Hi guys,
I am struggling writing fast UDP server. It has to handle around 1
UDP packets per second. I started building that with non blocking
socket and threads. Unfortunately my approach does not work at all.
I wrote a simple case test: client and server. The client sends 2200
packets within
14 matches
Mail list logo
