Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is nicer about each?
Yes.
And No.
Or maybe ?
This isn't Haskell.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is nicer about each?
Yes.
And No.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and the stable release and much will change stuff is pure FUD, of
course. what competing project will I find if I google your name?)
Found something? Maybe this could help me to choose a web
framework.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:11 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Django isn't ready.
That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
The 1.0 release will be in September.
So what? It's
Dave U. Random [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Django isn't ready.
That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
The 1.0 release will be in September.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
abeen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would want to know which could be the best programming language for
developing web spider.
Since you ask in comp.lang.python: I'd suggest APL
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Stefan Scholl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
to work with XML, then generate well-formed XML in the correct
encoding. There's no reason you
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
But the style of the answers makes me wonder if I should report
the bug in xml.sax (or its documentation) or just ignore it.
Note that PyXML is no longer actively maintained, so it's unlikely that
Too bad it can still be found
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/07, Stefan Scholl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just checked on a system without PyXML: xml/sax/__init__.py
defines parseString() and uses cStringIO (when available).
Python 2.5.1
Yes, thats the fixed bug. After all this you still do not seem
Michael L Torrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Don't let the subject line fool you. I'm OK with cStringIO. The
thread is now about xml.sax's parseString().
Giving you the benefit of the doubt here, despite the fact that Stefan
Behnel has state this over and over again
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte
encoded string. Read the XML spec.
Pointers, please.
There you have it:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#charencoding
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:47:48 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
to work with XML, then generate well-formed XML in the correct
encoding
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte
encoded string. Read the XML spec.
Pointers, please.
Last time I read that part of the spec was when a customer's
consulting company switched to ISO-8859-15 without saying
something
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing
the fact, that I can't use Unicode with parseString().
This parseString() uses cStringIO.
Well, Python unicode is not a valid *byte* encoding for XML.
lxml.etree
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing
(PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one:
$ python2.5
Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35:53)
[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1
After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing
(PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one:
$ python2.5
Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35:53)
[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing
the fact, that I can't use Unicode
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
to work with XML, then generate well-formed XML in the correct
encoding. There's no reason you should have an XML document (as
opposed to values extracted from that document) in unicode
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing
the fact, that I can't use Unicode with parseString().
This parseString() uses cStringIO.
Well, Python
In comp.lang.lisp sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an
efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with
You are not allowed to publish .NET benchmarks. :-)
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web
Nicholas Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that in this context it is used for removing a specific key
from the current dictionary object. But why call it pop and not
something more intuitive like remove or delete?
I wasn't a python programmer back than, but I'd guess it's
Boris Ozegovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm, can somebody tell me which language is this one:
pNo polls are available./p
English?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
JustStand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In many ways, it was the launch of Windows 95 and Office 95 eleven
years ago that signaled the start of this transformation. ...
Right. 11 years ago I switched from Amiga to Linux.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
In comp.lang.lisp Jon Ribbens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/index.html
Careful there with the sweeping generalizations and quick judgments
about languages :)
I just read PHP as a language is rather dry and
25 matches
Mail list logo
