On 12 Mar 2014 15:29:59 GMT, Alex van der Spek zd...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:00:09 -0500, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Alex van der Spek zd...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
=== 8 ===
Having been taught programming in Algol60 Python still defeats me at times!
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:52:24 +0200, Karl
8213543ggxnvjx...@kabelmail.de wrote:
Hello,
one beginner question:
aList = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
bList = [2*i for i in aList]
sum = 0
for j in bList:
sum = sum + bList[j]
print j
0
2
4
IndexError: 'list index out of range'
Why is j in the second
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:57:09 -0700 (PDT), Peter
peter.milli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 28, 12:31 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve-REMOVE-
t...@cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:34 -0700, Eduardo Ribeiro wrote:
But it doesn't work.
What do you mean doesn't work?
- It crashes the
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:45:44 -0400, Andreas Waldenburger
use...@geekmail.invalid wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:48:06 +0200 Marco Gallotta
ma...@gallotta.co.za wrote:
Since these are kids, we feel the nice changes in 3 such as removing
integer division will help in teaching. It will also remove
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:26:52 -0400, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
On 2:59 PM, Baba wrote:
Hi
In below code the outer loop test in step 4 will execute ( n + 1 )
times (note that an extra step is required to terminate the for loop,
hence n + 1 and not n executions), which will consume T4(
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:34:47 +0100, Andre Engels
andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mensanator mensana...@aol.com wrote:
Tongue in cheek solution:
import urllib2
url = 'http://primes.utm.edu/lists/small/1.txt'
primes = []
for line in
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:37:22 +0200, Christian Heimes
li...@cheimes.de wrote:
pdpi wrote:
On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator as well.
Hmm. I don't think 'nice' is
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 7:29 pm, Wayne Brehaut wbreh...@mcsnet.ca wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd also guess that 'xor' would be much less used than
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator as well.
Hmm. I don't think 'nice' is
On 15 Jul 2009 09:11:44 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:25:08 -0700, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice
to have an 'xor' operator as well.
I've often wished there was
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT), Saurabh
saurabh.gupt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to move my application on a MVC architecture and plan to
use Jinja for the same. Can anyone provide me with few quick links
that might help me to get started with Jinja?
Perhaps the most
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:20:49 -0800 (PST), aassime abdellatif
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'And they devised, and God
devised, and God devised, and God is the best of divisors.
Obvious, since God is One, and so He divides 1, and 0, and -1, and all
integers both positive and negative (Peace Be Upon
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:41:56 +0100, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
(snip spam)
Obvious, since God is One, and so He divides 1, and 0, and -1, and all
integers both positive and negative (Peace Be Upon Them).
wwwayne
wwwayne,
My isp did a good job
Hi braver,
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:17:14 -0800 (PST), braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to check, for a filehandle f, that EOF has been reached on
it. What's the way to do it? I don't want to try/except on EOF, I
want to check, after I read a line, that now we're in the EOF state.
It
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:06:15 -0800 (PST), braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 22, 3:41 am, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have PythonWin 2.5.1 (r251:54863, May 1 2007, 17:47:05) [MSC v.1310
32 bit (Intel)] on win32.for example, using Help, Index, eof gives:
8 ===
HTH
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:00:12 -0800, John DeRosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:23:56 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 00:10 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 6, 12:30 pm, Nicola Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've updated my
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:23:25 +0200, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going back to the original question, a related question: does anybody
know why there are so few books on data structures and algorithms that
use Python?
I remember that, at least ~ 12 years ago there were many (and
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:32:06 +0200, Fredrik Lundh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Going back to the original question, a related question: does anybody
know why there are so few books on data structures and algorithms that
use Python?
Probably because Python has better
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:44:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this group so I don't know if this question has been posted
before, but does anyone knows about linear/integer programming
routines in Python that are available on the web, more specifically of
the branch
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J. Clifford Dyer a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:11:07PM -, Grant Edwards wrote
regarding Re: Python Magazine: Issue 1 Free!:
On 2007-10-05, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just been told
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:52:13 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J. Clifford Dyer a écrit :
(snip)
Well, it's also unpythonic to start numbering a sequence at 1, but
it's
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:13:21 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Pa , 13:39, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
import string
Why import 'string' if you're not using it?
f=open('/test/test.asc','r')
o=open('/test/out.asc','w')
for line in f:
s=
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:56:18 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Christof Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To get rid of the if statements, replace __init__ function with:
def __init__(self, tc):
functionToCall = eval(self.testCase%s % tc)
Or functionToCall =
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:10:05 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
(snip)
after Bruno made the
claim: OO is about machines - at least as conceveid by Alan Key, who
invented the term and most of the concept.
Please reread more carefully the above. I do
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:55:35 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Carlen a écrit :
Hi:
From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it. I have also found some
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:51:31 +0200, Hendrik van Rooyen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:37:13 -0400, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wayne Brehaut wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:32:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:47:20 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Carlen a écrit :
Hi:
From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it. I have also
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:27:13 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 1:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:42?pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:32:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 2:52 pm, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:30:16 -0700, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 13, 1:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:37:13 -0400, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wayne Brehaut wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:32:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
But I digress (but only because provoked!)...
[for purposes of this argument, at least]
This statement is the informal equivalent
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:18:43 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Brehaut wrote:
(had to be a semicolon there)
Not had to be since a discerning reader will note that the two
values in the list:
id(x), id(y)
(19105872, 19091664)
Wll, as long
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:37:04 -0400, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Aahz wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Chris Carlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it.
For that matter, even using OOP a bit with C++ and Perl, I didn't get it
until I learned
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:18:05 +0530, Rustom Mody
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/07, Alex Martelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OOP can be abused (particularly with deep or intricate inheritance
structures). But the base concept is simple and clear: you can bundle
state and behavior into a
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:49:48 -0600, darren kirby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth the Wayne Brehaut:
(I started with Royal McBee LGP 30 machine language (hex input) in
1958, and their ACT IV assembler later! Then FORTRAN IV in 1965. By
1967 I too was using (Burroughs) Algol-60, and 10 years
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:42?pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:21 pm, Jim Langston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Python 2.5
on intel, the statement
2**2**2**2**2
evaluates to 2**2**2**2**2
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:49:06 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wildemar Wildenburger wrote:
x = [1, 2, 3]
y = [1, 2, 3]
id(x), id(y)
x == y
x is y
Ooops!
Make that:
x = [1, 2, 3]
y = [1, 2, 3]
id(x); id(y)
x == y
x is y
(had to be a semicolon there)
Not had to be
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:37:00 -0400, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Evan Klitzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On 7/11/07, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Just for curiosity: This helps to find the answer to the problem Which
is
| the largest
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:30:16 -0700, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 13, 1:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:42?pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:21
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Carlen a écrit :
Hi:
From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it. I have also found some
articles profoundly critical of OOP. I tend to relate to these articles.
=== 8 ===
Hence, being a hardware
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:51:52 -0400, Jeff McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The raw_input built-in returns a string. The '[0]' subscript returns
the first character in the user supplied response as strings support
indexing.
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341)] on darwin
Type help,
41 matches
Mail list logo
