I've having an annoying problem at the moment. I'm writing code for
the travelling salesmen problem and comparing different techniques.
But I've having a problem using timeit.
I have a file called testplatform.py that contains 4 class:
Test() - which is called first to create the cities/routes to
On Aug 22, 11:13 am, Bart van Deenen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I've stumbled onto a python behavior that I don't understand at all.
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
# function
def X(l=[]):
l.append(1)
print l
# first call of X
X()
[1]
#second call of X
On Aug 18, 5:57 pm, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm probably missing something obvious but I can't put my finger on
it:
(3 in [3]) == True
True
3 in ([3] == True)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: argument of type 'bool' is not
On Aug 11, 10:55 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 10:10 pm, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jlist wrote:
I think what makes more sense is to compare the code one most
typically writes. In my case, I always use range() and never use psyco.
But I guess for most of my work
On Aug 8, 9:08 am, alex23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 8, 2:49 pm, Dhananjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it that a question of time and effort,
or is there something that doesn't make it appropriate to python ?
I don't think I've ever seen anyone who has raised concerns about the
speed
Honestly, performance benchmarks seem to be the dick size comparison
of programming languages.
But in the honour of dick size:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=alllang=all
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=alllang=all
--
By that logic, C++ is not OO. By that logic, Ruby is not OO. By that
logic, I know of only one OO language: Java :)
The fact that a language doesn't force you to do object-oriented
programming doesn't mean that it's not object-oriented. In other
words, your words are nonsense.
No, what it
Please understand that I'm not arguing about this particular design
choice (and FWIW, I'd mostly agree on the point that having a != b
different from not (a == b) is actually a wart). I'm just correcting
your statement about the behaviour of __eq__ / __ne__ not being
documented, which is
On Jul 24, 3:53 pm, Brett Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After many years happily coding Perl, I'm looking to expand my
horizons. [no flames please, I'm pretty aware of Perl's strengths and
weaknesses and I'm just here to learn more, not to enter religious
debates].
I've gone through some
My words aren't as clear as they should be. I mean that Python lets
*you* do something without documenting, or rather stating to use a
better term, that your intention is the non-obvious one. I'm not
saying that Python itself lacks documentation for its own behaviour;
I'm saying it should
On Jul 22, 5:59 am, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-07-22, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You talk about writing it in assembly language for each MPU
chip. Actually it is even better than that. We now have
these modern inventions, called
On Jul 21, 10:17 am, 甜瓜 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I'm confused about the motivation of releasing python2.6 and python3.0
at the *same* time. IMO, 2.6 should be compatible with 2.5 while 3.0
is new style python. Currenly, most python projects works fine in 2.5.
When 3.0 becomes final
zip(*vec_list) will zip together all entries in vec_list
Do be aware that zip stops on the shortest iterable. So if vec[1] is
shorter than vec[0] and matches otherwise, your output line will be
truncated. Or if vec[1] is longer and vec[0] matches as far as it goes,
there will be no signal
just... great !-)
Thanks :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
My question is: did something about the way the special method names are
implemented change for new-style classes?
class old:
pass
class new(object):
pass
testone = old()
testone.__call__ = lambda : 33
testone()
33
testtwo = new()
testtwo.__call__ = lambda : 33
On Jul 9, 2:08 am, Ben Keshet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi fans,
I want to use a 'for' iteration to manipulate files in a set of folders,
something like:
folders= ['1A28','1A6W','56Y7']
for x in folders:
print x # print the current folder
f = open('my/path/way/x/my_file.txt',
def ine(you):
yourself = what?
go = list(something), list(anything)
be = something
please = be, yourself
yourself = great
for good in yourself:
if you is good:
good in you
please.add(more, good)
else:
def inition(lacks, clarity):
On Jul 7, 11:55 am, A.T.Hofkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-07-07, abhishek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey guys...me nu 2 python yo...help me...by da way...jus joined
inthanks
Ask a specific question and you may get an answer.
If you want an answer from me, it helps *a lot* if you
On Jul 7, 3:47 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
(snip)
However welcome to Python and this Google
Group.
OT
This is *not* a google group. This is the usenet newsgroup
comp.lang.python, made accessible TTW by google.
/OT
Touche ;)
--
I am really stuck presently, trying to install these on my Windows XP.
I have downloaded easy_install and it is now in Python25\Scripts but
none of the commands I have read in either program folder have worked
to install them.
I was hoping someone could give me a step by step guide to installing
In case anyone is interested...
# Retrieved from:
http://en.literateprograms.org/Fibonacci_numbers_(Python)?oldid=10746
# Recursion with memoization
memo = {0:0, 1:1}
def fib(n):
if not n in memo:
memo[n] = fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
return memo[n]
# Quick exact computation of large
On Jun 28, 8:41 pm, Thierry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ie:
@if os.exists(foo):
etc
etc
and
@for blah:
etc
etc
This sounds more like PHP code, where a @ prefixing a function means
that even if there are errors or warnings, you don't want to see them.
Could also by
I've written up a little piece of code that isn't that foolproof to
scan through a file (java presently) to find functions and then look
for them throughout the document and output the name of the function,
followed by how many times it appears and the lines it appears on.
What I was looking for
On Jun 26, 5:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cédric Lucantis:
PAT = re.compile('^[ ]*(public|protected|private)[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)
[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)[ ]+\((.*)\).*$')
...
It might be hard to read but will avoid a lot of obscure parsing code.
You can use the VERBOSE mode, to add
On Jun 25, 11:55 am, antar2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am a beginner in Python and am not able to use a list element for
regular expression, substitutions.
list1 = [ 'a', 'o' ]
list2 = ['star', 'day', 'work', 'hello']
Suppose that I want to substitute the vowels from list2 that
On Jun 25, 12:38 pm, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
worth dropping emacs +
On Jun 24, 8:20 am, Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Perl 6 ever does get on its feet and get released, how does it
compare to Python 3000? Is Perl 6 more like Java now with Parrot? I
just want to make sure that Python is staying competitive.
If this is the wrong mailing list, just let
On Jun 24, 5:38 am, Mark Tolonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, ... don't ask me why, but in fact v1,v2,v3 = str1.split()
does not seem to work. My original problem was I forgot about
the parenthesis as Tim point out. So I
On Jun 24, 10:36 am, Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I meant, in terms of dealing with accurate or non-accurate rumors
is with speed, yes. There are plenty of comparisons where Perl is
4-15x faster then Python for 'some' operations regarding regular
expressions, etc.
For me
On Jun 24, 10:38 am, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 9:03 am, eliben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be the quickest way to do this ? I think that for dec2bin
conversion, using hex() and then looping with a hex-bin lookup table
would be probably much faster than the
And:
# return as a string
def itob_string(integer, count = 8):
return .join(str((integer i) 1) for i in range(count - 1,
-1, -1))
# return as an iterator (i.e [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0])
def itob_list(integer, count = 8):
return [(integer i) 1 for i in range(count - 1, -1, -1)]
#
On Jun 23, 4:45 pm, Andreu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to split a sentence and assign each word to a variable.
In Ruby I can do it as:
v1,v2,v3,v4,v5 = str1.split
Which will be the Python equivalent ? Thanks.
Andrew.
Well a straight copy would be...
example = Hello, how are you
v1,
Yes I was wondering about that, but I wasn't clear about when 'body'
code (ie not contained within a def block) in the module might run
under Python. So it seemed to be safer to place the import statement
inside the 'constructor' to get the earliest warning of non-visibility
of pyserial. But
On Jun 18, 11:22 am, Robert Bossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wish to know how two dict objects are compared. By browsing the
archives I gathered that the number of items are first compared, but if
the two dict objects have the same number of items, then the comparison
algorithm was not
On Jun 18, 12:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 11:22 am, Robert Bossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wish to know how two dict objects are compared. By browsing the
archives I gathered that the number of items are first compared, but if
the two dict objects have the same
On Jun 18, 4:45 pm, Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2008-06-18T10:32:48Z, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# untested 2.5
for keys in dict_one.items():
if keys in dict_two:
if dict_one[keys] != dict_two[keys]:
# values are different
else:
# key is not present
if var not in (A, B, C):
do_something()
And this is why I love python.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 11, 8:11 am, Russ P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10, 11:58 am, Jonathan Gardner
Who cares what the type of an object is? Only the machine. Being able
to tell, in advance, what the type of a variable is is a premature
optimization. Tools like psyco prove that computers (really,
My question is: Why would anyone decide to obfuscate something as easy
to read as Python???
They didn't decide to obfuscate; they decided to follow a
strongly-expected convention for the name of that function by existing
users of the 'gettext' functionality, in contexts that predate the
Someone asked about Java;
class FieldTest {
public String publicString = Foobar;
private String privateString = Hello, World!;
}
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
public class Test4 {
public static void main(String args[]) {
final Field fields[] =
No need. The patch would be rejected. It would break existing code
that uses default.fromkeys() as designed and documented.
Perhaps that could be useful, so that future questions or posts on the
matter could instantly be directed to the rejected patch?
--
But the leading underscore doesn't tell you whether it is your own
private date, which you can use a you see fit, or those of someone
else, which you have to be very carefull with.
--
Antoon Pardon
Well how is that different from public accessor and mutators of
private variables?
--
a = 1, 2
b = 3, 4, 5
c = 6, 7, 8, 9
coord = list()
for i, j, k in zip(a, b, c):
coord.append((i, j, k))
print coord
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 28, 1:42 pm, Michael Fesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.oO(Ivan Illarionov)
No. Language does matter.
And the weather.
If you know how to program, you can write good code in any language if
you're familiar enough with it. Many people write good code in PHP, and
many write total crap
''.join(seen.add(c) or c for c in s if c not in seen)
From what I can understand...
.join will be a String of unique 'c' values.
'seen.add(c) or c' will always point to the second statement 'c'
because seen.add(c) returns None.
'if c not in seen' will ensure 'c' being added to both the .join
On May 21, 3:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 21, 1:47 pm, Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although that solution is pretty, it is not the canonical solution
because it doesn't cover the important case of if bodies needing to
access common variables in the
And wastes time. regular expressions can become expensive to match - doing
it twice might be hurtful.
Diez
match = (my_re1.match(line) or my_re2.match(line)) or
my_re3.match(line)
?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 21, 4:09 pm, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wastes time. regular expressions can become expensive to match -
doing it twice might be hurtful.
Diez
match = (my_re1.match(line) or my_re2.match(line)) or
my_re3.match(line)
How do you know
On May 21, 4:57 pm, inhahe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of the few things i miss from C is being able to use assignment in
expressions. that's the only thing, really.
also there's no switch/case, you have to use a dictionary of functions
instead, although i rarely need that, usually i just
On May 14, 8:37 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 10:20:41 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
Well, you should use xrange(10) instead of range(10).
CPython really is naive. That sort of thing should be a
compile-time optimization.
key = ''.join(sorted(word))
I tend to strip and lower the word as well, otherwise Hello and
hello do not compare...depends on what you want though!
Plus you might get a lot of word\n as keys...
My technique is the this way
def anagram_finder(words):
anagrams = {}
for word in words:
C#
using System;
namespace HelloWorld
{
Class HelloWorld
{
static void Main(String[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine(Hello World);
}
}
}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 7, 4:08 pm, brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to compare two dicts that should have identical info just in a
different data structure. The first dict's contents look like this. It
is authoritative... I know for sure it has the correct key value pairs:
{'001' : '01'}
The second
On May 7, 4:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi All,
I have no idea why I need to learn a new scripting language,
nothing much to the sytnax,
I need to understand what could be the prupose of another scripting
language
Cna you please help me with this,
Is there a
2.5 seems the defacto standard now for a new user, NB: probably not
the standard for the common business productions. However are you on
Windows or *nix? *nix may ship a certain version, so for ease of use
it would be best to use that.
Personally I use 2.5 because it is a complete version, and
On May 6, 12:22 pm, Boris Borcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan Booth wrote:
Torsten Bronger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest ugliness though is ,.join(). No idea why this should
be better than join(list, separator= ). Besides, ,.join(ux)
yields an unicode object. This is
I would imagine this is why I haven't found any schools teaching
Python in their basic programming classes too. On the dynamic typing,
isn't that the same sort of thing that lots of scripting languages
do? VBScript doesn't require you to define your variables, but I
don't really want to use
On May 6, 5:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - further to my earlier query regarding partial matches (which with
all your replies enabled me to advance my understanding, thanks), I
now need to reverse a dict.
I know how to reverse a list (with the reverse method - very handy),
but it
A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4
production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a guesstimate of what
percentage of this test code tests for things that you would get for
free in a statically typed language ? I'm just curious whether this
argument against
| # Double Quote Text
|# match a double quote
|(# - Two Possiblities:
|\\. # match two backslashes followed by anything
(include newline)
||# OR
|[^]
Civilisation 4 uses Python everywhere and is the main tool used by
Modders of the game.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
couldn't you just do.
#untested
new_round(n):
answer = round(n)
# is answer now odd
if answer % 2:
return answer - 1
else:
return answer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 11, 1:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
couldn't you just do.
#untested
new_round(n):
answer = round(n)
# is answer now odd
if answer % 2:
return answer - 1
else:
return answer
Whoops, this also affects odd numbers...
Will try and find a GOOD solution later...
Umm, Mesopotamia is an area geographically located between the Tigris
and Euphrates rivers, Bangalore isn't anywhere near that. And most of
that is presently under American control.
If you don't want to give out your code then try explaining it better.
What is the input, what is the output, how
In general you should only catch the exceptions you want to catch,
therefore avoiding the issue of catching unexpected ones, for
instances the programming unexpectandly closing.
Well, exception handling is expensive (when it catches one) so it
really is up to you. If you are using eval and know
def Calc():
global nbr
try:
print eval(nbr)
#a = Label(mygui, text=eval(nbr))
#a.place(relx=0.4, rely=0.1, anchor=CENTER)
except:
print Not computable
nbr =
def Erase():
global nbr
nbr =
Seems to me you could be better off
the erase() id alwys need if u wanna abort whilst u wrote something.
But if it is meant to only evaluate once you've pressed the enter key
(I take it?) you shouldn't need that. And if you are to abort while
evaluating it will not do that.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This for me is Python's chief selling point: dir()dir() and
help(). Python's two selling points are dir(), help(), and very
readable code. Python's *three* selling points are dir(),
help(), very readable code, and an almost fanatical devotion to
the BFDL. Amongst Python's selling
'I have designed a program with more than 500 if elif else'
This was your first mistake...
(ii) x3=x1.find(x2)
returns an integer corresponding to the start position in x1 where it
found x2, otherwise it will return -1.
(i) ...
what kind of vague numbers? It should just give you an integer
I have a car. I have turned the ignition key but it fails to start.
Please tell me what is wrong with it.
The engine is missing! Am I close?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Just a random check. Is __gsignals__ a builtin type? Else it would
probably be better not to include the postfix underscores. Though I
might be wrong here. Otherwise seems pretty good and well organised. I
hate it when people go comment mad, but you've kept them to the places
where an explanation
I was wondering if anyone knew of some online (free if possible)
advanced tutorials, especially ones that provides tasks and ideas for
small projects. The issue for myself is I want to improve my python
programming level, and my ability to program in general, but come up
blank thinking of a
On Apr 2, 3:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I found the following code on the net -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-python-cvs/200509.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
def count(self):
-db = sqlite.connect(self.filename,
isolation_level=ISOLATION_LEVEL)
-
def s(c):return[]if c==[]else s([_ for _ in c[1:]if _c[0]])+[c[0]]
+s([_ for _ in c[1:]if _=c[0]])
Anyone else got some wonders...?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
if __name__ == '__main__':
print Globals (For Loop):
try:
for i in globals():
print \t%s % i
except RuntimeError:
print Only some globals() printed\n
else:
print All globals() printed\n
print Globals (Generator):
try:
print
a = 1
b = 1
a is b
True
id(a)
10901000
id(b)
10901000
Isn't this because integers up to a certain range are held in a single
memory location, thus why they are the same?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 13, 8:36 am, Hendrik van Rooyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised that it took me so long to bloody my nose on this one.
It must be well known - and I would like to find out how well known.
So here is a CLOSED BOOK multiple choice question - no RTFM,
no playing at the
Still, I suppose this is a gotcha for a lot of people, just follow the
good advice Paul said;
By Python convention, methods that mutate the object return None, and
also stuff that returns None doesn't generate output at the
interactive prompt.
And you should survive most.
--
On Mar 12, 2:44 pm, Robert Bossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
Robert Bossy wrote:
k.i.n.g. wrote:
I think I am not clear with my question, I am sorry. Here goes the
exact requirement.
We use dd command in Linux to create a file with of required size. In
similar
The trick in the case of when you do not want to guess, or the choices
grow too much, is to ask the user to tell you in what format they want
it and format according to their wishes.
Neatly avoids too much guessing and isn't much extra to add.
--
What is it with people and double++ posting...
If you have a lot to say, say it together and take the time to slow
down, re-read it and not just fly it out, line by line, by line, by
line...
To answer only the following:
That's creepy for people that are new to programming and doesn't know
On Feb 21, 3:31 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:20 pm, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 10:26 am, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason wrote:
Hmm. I must be the only person who doesn't think the double
Can someone help me to get in the right track, and get a good move?
http://wiki.python.org/moin/BeginnersGuide
http://www.diveintopython.org/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 20, 9:12 am, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are people really writing pure HTML snippets in docstrings to document
each module/class/method? For anything other than a toy project?
One of the main reasons I'm considering moving to epydoc + reST is
precisely because it's
So people's problem with __word__ is that it is not very readable?
How so, it stands out on page, it clearly is different from other
objects and doesn't abuse other symbols that generally have a meaning
based on their use.
I haven't seen a single alternative that really stands out as much as
On Feb 18, 9:37 am, Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
samuraisam wrote:
Has anyone done any recent testing as to which current python
implementation is the quickest?
Search for a recent thread on CPython and IronPython.
Perhaps for Django development -
though the current one
Dear Ilias,
Post in a single reply.
Coko
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
$ python -m timeit -s 'l=[]' 'len(l)==1000'
100 loops, best of 3: 0.256 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'l=[]' 'len(l)==1000'
100 loops, best of 3: 0.27 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'l=[]' 's=len(l); s==1000'
100 loops, best of 3: 0.287 usec per loop
$ python -m
hmm... interesting
here is another way you can find prime
numbershttp://love-python.blogspot.com/2008/02/find-prime-number-upto-100-nu...
Sadly that is pretty slow though...
If you don't mind readability you can make the example I gave into
five lines.
def p(_):
if _3:return[2]if _==2
And the rest of us just use SI. (And if you bring up the
_kilogram-force_, I'll just cry.)
SI = Super Incredible?
Awesome name for Force/Mass / NewItemOfClothing2050!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The irony that, x = (,) produces an error.
Personally I would of thought it would be a better example of an empty
tuple than anything else, but it still isn't that readable.
The use of dict/list/tuple/set seems to stand out a lot better, makes
it readable! Else in a few years you'll have §x§ =
I was reading up on this site [http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/
2007/03/18/a-regular-expression-to-check-for-prime-numbers/] of an
interesting way to work out prime numbers using Regular Expression.
However my attempts to use this in Python keep returning none
(obviously no match), however I don't
On Feb 12, 7:16 am, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Max Francis wrote:
Jeff Schwab wrote:
Erik Max Francis wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-02-12, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough!
Dear me, what's Usenet coming to these days...
I know, really.
On Feb 8, 8:23 am, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 8:44 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know what others think about it, about this anti-feature.
What I can say is that other computer languages too think that boolean
On Feb 8, 1:30 am, jack trades [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hjorleifsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on windows you can put this in HKEY_Local_Machine\Software\Microsoft
\Windows\Current Version\Run and it will run at logon (or fast user
switch) for each
On Feb 5, 9:19 am, Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
( Surely if this question has been asked for a zillion of times... )
( and sorry for my english! )
I'm impressed with python. I'm very happy with the language and I
find Python+Pygame a very powerful and productive way of writing
On Jan 30, 9:50 am, Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 ene, 08:09, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
li = [1,2,3,4,5]
filter(lambda x: x != 3, li)
[1, 2, 4, 5]
I haven't measured it, but this should be the
Anyone else noticed that the OP has not actually replied to any of the
suggestions...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 28, 11:42 am, Russ P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 1:51 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ P. a écrit : A while back I came across a tentative proposal from way
back in 2000
for optional static typing in Python:
(snip)
In any case,
On Jan 24, 8:21 am, ryan k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 6:30 pm, John Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 9:50 am, ryan k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven D'Aprano, you are a prick.
And your reasons for coming to that stridently expressed conclusion
after reading a
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
