On Apr 21, 11:36 pm, Rui Maciel wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > It's only easy to install a package on Ubuntu if you know that you have
> > to, and can somehow work out the name of the package.
>
> No one actually has to install tkinter. That's the whole point of providing
> it as a separate
On Apr 19, 10:35 am, Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 2013.04.19 12:17, lcrocker wrote:> Am I mistaken in my belief that tkinter
> is a non-optional part of the
> > Python language? I installed the "python3" package on Ubuntu, and
> > tkinter is not included--it's a
Thanks, but I'm not having any trouble running tkinter, it works just
fine. I have an issue with the fact that it's optional. It reflects
badly on the language and community if we allow just anyone to call
something "Python" that doesn't meet some minimum standard of quality.
Java has its complianc
Am I mistaken in my belief that tkinter is a non-optional part of the
Python language? I installed the "python3" package on Ubuntu, and
tkinter is not included--it's an optional package "python3-tk" that
has to be installed separately. I reported this as a bug as was
summarily slapped down.
Can we
