On 2016-10-02, nicolasessisbre...@gmail.com :
> **How does this compare to Python+Numpy?
> **How much faster is Fython, and what are the restrictions on the
> **Python code?
>
> Python+Numpy allows easy processing of vector, but there is a limit to
> how much user-defined logic can be used with N
On 2016-10-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:41 PM, wrote:
>> Fython permits to write numerical code with the same syntax then Python.
>> Under the hood, the code is transpiled to Fortran and run at top speed.
>
> How does this compare to Python+Numpy? How much faster is Fyth
Ned Deily writes:
> In article
> ,
> Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Raoul Gough
>> wrote:
[snip]
>> > So did something go wrong with the installer, or is it all
>> > supposed to work somehow differently?
>>
>>
Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin
-type f) .
So did something go wrong with the installer, or is it all supposed to
work somehow differently?
--
Raoul Gough.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
very nice bill. thanks all.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I like Ploticus. It's a bit kludgy for integration, you need to send
the data to a file and have ploticus read it, but this can be easily
done using memory mapped files. It's a very fast package and it
produces very nice plots. SVG plots too. We use an svg viewer and then
reload the svg tree to rer
I can't figure this one out. Trying to be unnecessarily functional I
suspect.
I have the following lists.
vals = [1.000,2.344,4.2342]
tab = [((0,1),(0,3),(0,4)),
((2,2),(3,0),(3,9)),
((3,4),(6,3),(7,1))]
I'm trying to create a one liner using map/reduce/lambda/zip(* etc to
do repla
