On Apr 29, 2:44 am, War Office <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of
> this building contradicts the laws of physics?
Why do you assume he's even capable of doing so? He's just a crackpot,
but he's in the unfortunate majority.
> Why do
On May 3, 4:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and
> > watching its' structure deform is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Ask yourself, how can all these people, supposed physicists, engineers,
> > software developers, people of supposed intelligence be incapable of
> > understanding that fire cannot make buildings free
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Ask yourself, how can all these people, supposed physicists, engineers,
software developers, people of supposed intelligence be incapable of
understanding that fire cannot make buildings free fall? How can they
not understand that a free falling WTC 7 means it was a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Below is a post repeated with interesting information. But the main
> purpose of this post is to find out how many sheeple still believe in
> the 911 fairy tale of 19 hijackers that was to be USED BY THE EVIL
> CRIMINALS TO "change the world forever" BUT IT WONT. Are we
malibu wrote:
> tadchem wrote:
> > "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" was a fraud
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
> > http://ddickerson.igc.org/protocols.html
> > http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mzionprotocol.html
> > http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoaxorum/h
