On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> I'm not sure about X-No-Html. A quick Google search for that header returned
> nothing useful.
Yeah. At best it seems redundant - "Hey look, there's no HTML in this
message!" - but I suspect it's mainly bragging "I can add headers to
my po
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Even if it respects that, there's no way that Mailman can know to
> respect his ridiculous copyright restriction.
>
Well, sure. But Mailman is probably not alone in this regard. In case it
wasn't clear from Tony the Tiger's post (everything
On 07/09/2015 08:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I thought so at first add well. It looks like the Mailman system handles the
>> X-No-Archive and/or Archive headers. I couldn't find his name in this
>> month's archive.
>
> Even if it respects that, there's no way that Mailman can know to
> respect
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
>> Also, he should not post here, because all articles posted here are
>> automatically put on a mailing list and that list's web-accessible
>> archive.
>
> I thought so at first add well. It looks like the Mailman system handles the
> X-No-Ar
> Also, he should not post here, because all articles posted here are
> automatically put on a mailing list and that list's web-accessible
> archive.
I thought so at first add well. It looks like the Mailman system handles
the X-No-Archive and/or Archive headers. I couldn't find his name in this
m
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, at 15:36, Tony the Tiger wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:29:11 +, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
> > X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2015 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
> > Distribution through any means other than regular usenet channels is
> > forbidden. It is forbidden to publish thi
On 07/05/2015 01:29 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
The function »datetime.datetime.now().time()« does not yield
a value that is determined by the expression »time()«;
instead its value can /differ/ between two calls even when the
call »time()« does not differ. In mathematics, however, a
ca
On 2015-07-06 00:44, Robert Kern wrote:
>> I believe the term is "idempotent"
>
> No, "idempotent" means that if it changes the state, then applying
> it twice or more has the same effect as applying it once.
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
-tkc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
In a message of 05 Jul 2015 20:29:11 +, Stefan Ram writes:
> But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> of the world, but that the state of the world does
> influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
> »date
> And this is the intention of my post: Maybe there is such
> a term, and I just missed to learn it so far? So,
> do you know a term for the phenomenon that can be found
> in Python but not in mathematics and consists in the state
> of the world influencing the value of an expressions?
In the
On 07/05/2015 04:29 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
of the world, but that the state of the world does
influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
»datetime.datetime.now
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> of the world, but that the state of the world does
> influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
> »datetime.dat
On 2015-07-05 21:36, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
of the world, but that the state of the world does
influence the value (behaviour) of a call
On 7/5/2015 4:29 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
And this is the intention of my post: Maybe there is such
a term, and I just missed to learn it so far? So,
do you know a term for the phenomenon that can be found
in Python but not in mathematics and consists in the state
of the world influe
On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
> But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> of the world, but that the state of the world does
> influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as
> »datetime.datetime.now()
On 2015-07-05 15:36, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote:
> > But why do we not have a common and well-known term for
> > the counterpart, that something does not modify the state
> > of the world, but that the state of the world does
> > influence the value (behaviour
16 matches
Mail list logo
